Cited by 46Climate Change Communication and PerceptionEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityPlace Attachment and Urban Studies

The impact of place and legacy framing on climate action: A lifespan approach

Open access
Wickersham, Robert H., Zaval, Lisa, Pachana, Nancy A., Smyer, Michael A.·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Despite several decades of research on more effectively communicating climate change to the general public, there is only limited knowledge about how older adults engage with an issue that will shape and define future generations. We focus on two key factors that may motivate younger and older adults to engage in climate change action, legacy concern and place attachment, and assess whether older adults differ in any appreciable way from the general population in this domain. We randomly exposed participants of different ages to either a Legacy, Place, or control writing induction task before they completed various self-report measures. Both induction conditions were associated with significantly greater pro-environmental behavioral intentions and donations for all age groups when compared to the control condition. Legacy motivation and biophilia were used as manipulation checks and found to partially mediate these effects. Findings suggest that legacy and place message framing may be useful in prompting adults of all ages to take action to help combat climate change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0228963

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Place-and legacy-based interventions have been explored as effective motivational strategies.

    “Place-and legacy-based interventions have also been explored as effective motivational strategies [44,48,50,53,54].”
  • Wickersham et al.'s study found that place-and legacy-based interventions had a positive influence on the pro-environmental attitudes and behaviours of 1,005 American participants (with 45% identifying as environmentalists).

    “Wickersham et al.'s study found these interventions had a positive influence on the pro-environmental attitudes and behaviours of 1,005 American participants (with 45% identifying as environmentalists) [54].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Milfont TL, Sibley CG. Exploring the concept of environmental generativity. Int J Hisp Psychol [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 4(1): 21– 30. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/384fd868d08c1a72835b873bb8bc2590/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2034866

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wickersham, R. H., Zaval, L., Pachana, N. A., & Smyer, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Bucknell University (US)
Corresponding author
Wickersham, Robert H.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-02-25
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
e0228963
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008366729
Cited by
46
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bucknell University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Keywords
climate change communication, place attachment, pro-environmental behavior, climate action, older adults, lifespan differences, biophilia, message framing
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Politics, United States, Intention, Young Adult, Climatic Processes, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review