The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy
Abstract
It is widely recognised that public acceptability often poses a barrier towards renewable energy development. This article reviews existing research on public perceptions of wind energy, where opposition is typically characterized by the NIMBY (not in my back yard) concept. The objectives of the article are to provide a critical assessment of past research and an integrated, multidimensional framework to guide future work. Six distinct strands of research are identified, summarized and critiqued: public support for switching from conventional energy sources to wind energy; aspects of turbines associated with negative perceptions; the impact of physical proximity to turbines; acceptance over time of wind farms; NIMBYism as an explanation for negative perceptions; and, finally, the impact of local involvement on perceptions. Research across these strands is characterized by opinion poll studies of general beliefs and case studies of perceptions of specific developments. In both cases, research is fragmented and has failed to adequately explain, rather than merely describe, perceptual processes. The article argues for more theoretically informed empirical research, grounded in social science concepts and methods. A multidimensional framework is proposed that goes beyond the NIMBY label and integrates previous findings with social and environmental psychological theory. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
Cited by
Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640560701402075 · Cited by 448
Cowell, R., Bristow, G., & Munday, M. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.521047 · Cited by 417
Leaves based triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) and TENG tree for wind energy harvesting
Feng, Y., Zhang, L., Zheng, Y., Wang, D., Zhou, F., & Liu, W. (2019) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.075 · Cited by 322
Health effects and wind turbines: A review of the literature
Knopper, L. D., & Ollson, C. A. (2011) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-10-78 · Cited by 210
The Politics of Landscape Value: A Case Study of Wind Farm Conflict in Rural Catalonia
Zografos, C., & Martínez-Alier, J. (2009) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a41208 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Devine‐Wright, P.
- Venue
- Wind Energy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-139
- ISSN
- 1095-4244 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1824
- OpenAlex
- W2151387608
- Cited by
- 1,309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.