The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wind turbine condition monitoring: technical and commercial challenges
Open accessAbstract
Deployment of larger scale wind turbine systems, particularly offshore, requires more organized operation and maintenance strategies to ensure systems are safe, profitable and cost‐effective. Among existing maintenance strategies, reliability centred maintenance is regarded as best for offshore wind turbines, delivering corrective and proactive (i.e. preventive and predictive) maintenance techniques enabling wind turbines to achieve high availability and low cost of energy. Reliability centred maintenance analysis may demonstrate that an accurate and reliable condition monitoring system is one method to increase availability and decrease the cost of energy from wind. In recent years, efforts have been made to develop efficient and cost‐effective condition monitoring techniques for wind turbines. A number of commercial wind turbine monitoring systems are available in the market, most based on existing techniques from other rotating machine industries. Other wind turbine condition monitoring reviews have been published but have not addressed the technical and commercial challenges, in particular, reliability and value for money. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap and present the wind industry with a detailed analysis of the current practical challenges with existing wind turbine condition monitoring technology. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Condition Monitoring for Device Reliability in Power Electronic Converters: A Review
Yang, S., Xiang, D., Bryant, A., Mawby, P., Ran, L., & Tavner, P. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2010.2049377 · Cited by 1,278
Self-citationReview of condition monitoring of rotating electrical machines
Tavner, P. J. (2008) · IET Electric Power Applications · doi:10.1049/iet-epa:20070280 · Cited by 531
Self-citation
Cited by
A review of wind turbine bearing condition monitoring: State of the art and challenges
de Azevedo, H. D. M., Araújo, A. M., & Bouchonneau, N. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.032 · Cited by 382
Monitoring wind turbine gearboxes
Feng, Y., Qiu, Y., Crabtree, C. J., Long, H., & Tavner, P. J. (2013) · Wind Energy · doi:10.1002/we.1521 · Cited by 253
Self-citationIgba, J., Alemzadeh, K., Durugbo, C., & Eiriksson, E. T. (2016) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.006 · Cited by 177
Afridi, Y. S., Ahmad, K., & Hassan, L. (2022) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.7100 · Cited by 140
Vieira, M., Henriques, E., Snyder, B., & Reis, L. (2022) · Structural Safety · doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102154 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, W., Tavner, P. J., Crabtree, C. J., Feng, Y., & Qiu, Y.
- Venue
- Wind Energy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 673-693
- ISSN
- 1095-4244 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1824
- OpenAlex
- W2097138094
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
