Cited by 33Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesStructural Integrity and Reliability AnalysisWind Energy Research and Development

Insights on the impact of structural health monitoring systems on the operation and maintenance of offshore wind support structures

Open access
Vieira, M., Henriques, E., Snyder, B., Reis, L.·2022·Structural Safety

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102154

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vieira, M., Henriques, E., Snyder, B., & Reis, L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Politécnica de Setúbal (PT)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Vieira, M.
Venue
Structural Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
94
Pages
102154
ISSN
0167-4730 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3210680986
Cited by
33
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structural Safety (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PD/BD/114146/2016, UIDB/50022/2020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Wind Energy Research and Development
Keywords
structural health monitoring, monopile foundations, operation and maintenance costs, stochastic modeling, Monte Carlo simulation, failure modes, sensitivity analysis, cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review