The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
Abstract
This article discusses the history and highlights of the Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics (JCGS) as the journal approaches its 25th anniversary. A unique venture between three organizations—the American Statistical Association (ASA), the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS), and the Interface Foundation of North America (IFNA)—JCGS has come to occupy an important niche in the statistical literature and establish itself as a forward‐thinking, high‐quality journal in its area. In addition to its contributions to the statistical literature, JCGS has often served as the test‐bed for new ideas and methods of publishing and delivery, each of which has presented challenges. But with every obstacle, the three partner organizations have risen to the occasion, supported the journal, and ensured that JCGS not only succeeds but thrives. We will take the reader through an undoubtedly incomplete, but hopefully informative history of JCGS from planning stages to inception and growth, with highlights and innovations presented along the way. The Supporting Information presents further details and data that could not fit within the space restrictions of the focus article itself. WIREs Comput Stat 2014, 6:233–239. doi: 10.1002/wics.1307 This article is categorized under: Applications of Computational Statistics > Organizations and Publications
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation
Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.1.5 · Cited by 4,926
Lambert, P. C., Sutton, A. J., Burton, P. R., Abrams, K. R., & Jones, D. R. (2005) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2112 · Cited by 511
Sharing and Specificity of Co-expression Networks across 35 Human Tissues
Pierson, E., the GTEx Consortium, Koller, D., Battle, A., & Mostafavi, S. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004220 · Cited by 177
Explainable artificial intelligence in Alzheimer’s disease classification: a systematic review
Viswan, V., Shaffi, N., Mahmud, M., Subramanian, K., & Hajamohideen, F. (2024) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-023-10192-x · Cited by 195
Distinguishing between selective sweeps from standing variation and from a de novo mutation
Peter, B. M., Huerta-Sanchez, E., & Nielsen, R. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003011 · Cited by 193
Welton, N. J., & Ades, A. E. (2005) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x05282637 · Cited by 174
Popov, A., Abdullah, Z., Wickenhauser, C., Saric, T., Driesen, J., Hanisch, F.-G., Domann, E., Raven, E. L., Dehus, O., Hermann, C., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci28996 · Cited by 133
Hominid Brain Evolution: Testing Climatic, Ecological, and Social Competition Models
Bailey, D. H., & Geary, D. C. (2009) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-008-9054-0 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Levine, R. A., Sampson, E., & Lee, T. C. M.
- Venue
- WIREs Computational Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 233-239
- ISSN
- 1939-0068 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5108
- OpenAlex
- W4254259096
- Cited by
- 1,424
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 289.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.