Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing nanotoxicity in cells in vitro

Open access
Hillegass, Jedd M., Shukla, Arti, Lathrop, Sherrill A., MacPherson, Maximilian B., Fukagawa, Naomi K., Mossman, Brooke T.·2010·WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology

Abstract

Nanomaterials are commonly defined as particles or fibers of less than 1 µm in diameter. For these reasons, they may be respirable in humans and have the potential, based upon their geometry, composition, size, and transport or durability in the body, to cause adverse effects on human health, especially if they are inhaled at high concentrations. Rodent inhalation models to predict the toxicity and pathogenicity of nanomaterials are prohibitive in terms of time and expense. For these reasons, a panel of in vitro assays is described below. These include cell culture assays for cytotoxicity (altered metabolism, decreased growth, lytic or apoptotic cell death), proliferation, genotoxicity, and altered gene expression. The choice of cell type for these assays may be dictated by the procedure or endpoint selected. Most of these assays have been standardized in our laboratory using pathogenic minerals (asbestos and silica) and non‐pathogenic particles (fine titanium dioxide or glass beads) as negative controls. The results of these in vitro assays should predict whether testing of selected nanomaterials should be pursued in animal inhalation models that simulate physiologic exposure to inhaled nanomaterials. Conversely, intrathoracic or intrapleural injection of nanomaterials into rodents can be misleading because they bypass normal clearance mechanisms, and non‐pathogenic fibers and particles can test positively in these assays. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2010 2 219–231 This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wnan.54

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Hillegass, J. M., Shukla, A., Lathrop, S. A., MacPherson, M. B., Fukagawa, N. K., & Mossman, B. T.
Venue
WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-05
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
219-231
ISSN
  • 1939-0041 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5116
OpenAlex
W2117952964
Cited by
202
References
3
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing nanotoxicity in cells in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wnan.54
The paper
Hillegass, J. M., Shukla, A., Lathrop, S. A., MacPherson, M. B., Fukagawa, N. K., & Mossman, B. T. (2010). Assessing nanotoxicity in cells in vitro. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.54

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.