Cited by 24Schizophrenia research and treatmentTreatment of Major DepressionBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Antipsychotic drugs: challenges and future directions

Open access
Howes, Oliver H., Kaar, Stephen J.·2018·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Some sixty years on from the first use of chlorpromazine to treat schizophrenia, it is worth reflecting on where we have come from. Back in the 1950s, it was not known that dopamine was a neurotransmitter, how antipsychotics worked, what symptoms they worked on, or indeed if they worked at all1. Now we know that dopamine is a neurotransmitter, antipsychotics are all dopamine receptor blockers and, as Correll et al2 nicely review, large randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trials have unequivocally demonstrated that they work both to treat acute psychotic episodes and to reduce relapse rates over the short to medium term. Recent meta-analytic data generated from over sixty years of placebo-controlled trials estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) between antipsychotics and placebo to be 0.38, with a greater effect seen on positive symptoms (SMD=0.45) than negative symptoms (SMD=0.35), quality of life (SMD=0.35) or depression (SMD=0.27)3. Such effect sizes are comparable to or larger than those found for treatments used for many common physical health conditions, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for reducing cardiac events and mortality due to hypertension (SMD=0.16) and statins for reducing the risk of cardiac disease and stroke (SMD=0.15)4. Clearly, we have come a long way from the 1950s, but, despite these robust data on antipsychotics, many fundamental gaps in knowledge remain. One glaring gap highlighted in this Forum is that as of yet we are unable to say conclusively what the optimum length of treatment with antipsychotic medication should be, once a patient has recovered from an acute episode. In current practice, many patients are treated with antipsychotic medication long-term if not lifelong, in an attempt to prevent the frequency and severity of relapses that can be so disruptive to a person's life. Where patients are symptom free but experiencing side effects, such as weight gain, that may shorten life as well as affect its quality, the risk-benefit balance for relapse prevention is finely poised. Yet, as Correll et al highlight, there is little evidence from randomized, double blind controlled studies to support prophylactic treatment beyond two-three years. Whilst some naturalistic studies do provide support for treatment beyond this term, the inherent limitations of these designs mean that the question remains unresolved, and guidelines cannot be conclusive. This is a challenge to the field which needs to be met. We will need longer and, crucially, larger randomized controlled studies. This will not be easy, but other fields have risen to the challenge. For instance, in the case of the examples discussed above, statins and ACE inhibitors, there are now a number of randomized placebo-controlled trials with several thousand patients. These studies are roughly two orders of magnitude larger and five to ten times longer than the typical long-term randomized controlled study in schizophrenia. These large sample sizes give the power to have extended follow-up and account for treatment changes and drop-out. It is likely that we will need new ways of working, including international academic consortia as well as partnership with the pharmaceutical industry and governments, to achieve such large-scale studies. Correll et al also highlight heterogeneity in schizophrenia, something that is increasingly becoming apparent in the neurobiology underlying the disorder as well as its clinical manifestations, course and treatment response5. Treatment resistance is probably the most clinically important manifestation of heterogeneity in patients with schizophrenia, and remains a major issue that continues to provoke debate over its pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical management6. About a third of patients are thought to have treatment resistant illnesses, and around 15% show treatment resistance from illness onset7. Moreover, we have no way to identify the individuals whose illness will benefit from antipsychotic treatment. Thus, large numbers of patients currently receive antipsychotic treatment although their illness is unlikely to respond to dopamine antagonists. The solutions to this will likely be found in part through identifying biomarkers that allow disease stratification, for example by the likelihood of response to dopamine receptor antagonists and, in the future, novel non-dopamine receptor blocking medication. As both trial data and clinical experience show, current antipsychotic treatment works most effectively in reducing the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, whereas the negative and cognitive symptoms often remain problematic. Cognitive symptoms in particular are associated with poor functional outcomes in schizophrenia8, yet our current treatments do nothing for them. In fact, there is evidence to suggest that dopamine antagonists may cause secondary negative and cognitive symptoms in people with schizophrenia9. Put simply, taking an antipsychotic may

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20522

Cites

12 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Leucht S, Tardy M, Komossa K et al. Lancet 2012;379:2063-71.
  2. Wunderink L, Nieboer RM, Wiersma D et al. JAMA Psychiatry 2013;70:913-20.
  3. Chouinard G, Jones BD. Am J Psychiatry 1980; 137:16-21.
  4. Goff DC, Falkai P, Fleischhacker WW et al. Am J Psychiatry 2017;174:840-9.
  5. Murray RM, Quattrone D, Natesan S et al. Br J Psychiatry 2016;209:361-5.
  6. Correll CU, Rubio JM, Kane JM. World Psychiatry 2018;17:149-60.
  7. DeLisi LE, Fleischhacker WW. Curr Opin Psychi- atry 2016;29:187-9.
  8. Howes O, McCutcheon R, Stone J. J Psycho- pharmacol 2015;29:97-115.
  9. Correll CU, Rubio JM, Kane JM. World Psychia- try 2018;17:149-60.
  10. Leucht S, Leucht C, Huhn M et al. Am J Psychi- atry 2017;174:927-42.
  11. Leucht S, Hierl S, Kissling W et al. Br J Psychia- try 2012;200:97-106.
  12. Brugger SP, Howes OD. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74:1104-11.
  13. Howes OD, McCutcheon R, Agid O et al. Am J Psychiatry 2016;174:216-29.
  14. Lally J, Ajnakina O, Di Forti M et al. Psychol Med 2016;46:3231-40.
  15. Kirschner M, Aleman A, Kaiser S. Schizophr Res 2017;186:29-38.
  16. Demjaha A, Murray RM, McGuire PK et al. Am J Psychiatry 2012;169:1203-10.
  17. Pocklington AJ, Rees E, Walters JT et al. Neuron 2015;86:1203-14.
  18. Howes OD, Murray RM. Lancet 2014;383:1677- 87. DOI:10.1002/wps.20522 World Psychiatry 17:2 -June 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howes, O. H., & Kaar, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London London UK
  • King's College London (GB)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-24
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
170-171
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2806756628
Cited by
24
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Imperial College London
  • King's College London
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
antipsychotic drugs, schizophrenia, relapse prevention, long-term antipsychotic treatment, treatment duration, dopamine antagonists, antipsychotic adverse effects, weight gain, benefits and risks, naturalistic study, treatment guidelines, quality of life, depression in schizophrenia, chlorpromazine, positive and negative symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review