CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 88Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMental Health Research Topics

Brain networks and cognitive impairment in psychiatric disorders

Menon, Vinod·2020·World Psychiatry
DOI 10.1002/wps.20799
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cognitive impairments are a prominent feature of all psychiatric disorders. The goal of mapping each disorder to individual brain areas has now been largely abandoned, and supplanted by systems neuroscience approaches which focus on distributed circuits and large-scale brain organization1. Although the nature of cognitive impairments varies across disorders, a common underlying feature is the inability to adaptively regulate or control behavior in relation to changing goals and saliency of external stimuli and internal mental events. Dysregulation of the brain's cognitive control systems thus lies at the crux of most behavioral impairments. Cognitive control is a dynamic process, which relies on flexible goal-relevant modulation of brain networks, and investigations of dynamic network interactions are advancing fundamental knowledge of the neurobiological basis of psychiatric disorders2. The human brain is intrinsically organized into networks, each consisting of a distinct set of cortical and subcortical areas linked by temporally synchronous neural activity1. The intrinsic connectivity of brain networks displays close correspondence with task-related co-activation of brain regions, and this correspondence has allowed intrinsic and task-related connectivity to be demarcated and studied under a common systems neuroscience framework3. Brain networks not only provide a unifying framework for characterizing functional organization of the neurotypical brain, but also for probing the neurobiological basis of psychiatric disorders. In particular, aberrations in large-scale brain networks that implement cognitive control have now been shown to transdiagnostically underpin virtually all psychiatric disorders. Cognitive control processes are implemented by distinct large-scale brain networks, each with unique spatial and temporal properties. Three brain networks have received considerable attention in the context of impairments of cognitive control in psychiatric disorders: the salience network (SN), anchored in the anterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, with prominent subcortical nodes in affect and reward processing regions; the fronto-parietal (FPN) “central-executive” network, anchored in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex; and the default mode network (DMN), anchored in the medial posterior cingulate cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, medial temporal lobe, and angular gyrus4, 5. The SN network is crucial for “salience mapping”, i.e., detecting salient external stimuli and internal mental events and facilitating engagement or disengagement of brain systems relevant for goal-relevant behaviors. The FPN is involved in active maintenance and manipulation of information in working memory. The DMN is typically suppressed during focused attention to external stimuli, and is involved in self-referential and autobiographical processes. These networks are fundamental to human cognition and are critical for regulating adaptive goal-directed behaviors6, 7. A synthesis of findings over the past decade has led us to propose a triple network model of psychopathology, which posits that aberrant functional organization of the SN, FPN and DMN and their dynamic interactions underlie a wide range of psychiatric disorders2. Dysfunction in one or more of these networks has been reported in many psychiatric disorders, including autism, anxiety and mood disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and substance abuse. The model specifically hypothesizes a central role for the SN in aberrant salience assignment and mapping of external and internal events, leading to altered dynamic temporal interactions with the FPN and DMN. Misattribution of salience and the resulting dysregulation in engagement of appropriate task-relevant brain networks is thus predicted to be a proximal factor underlying cognitive impairments, and evidence in support of this model has been accumulating over the past decade in multiple psychiatric disorders. Critically, integrative between-network communication is crucial for efficient cognitive control and adaptive behaviors6-8. Models incorporating cross-network dynamics have identified robust neurobiological features capturing cognitive phenotypic characteristics in psychiatric disorders. These models better reflect aberrations in the waxing and waning of network-wide co-activation patterns arising from externally and internally driven mental events. The temporal evolution of the ensuing dynamical states captures clinical symptomatology and cognitive impairments better than static network features. In a recent study, we examined whether aberrant functional organization of the SN, FPN and DMN contributes to psychosis in schizophrenia9. We found that dynamic SN-centered cross-network interactions were significantly reduced, less persistent, and more variable in patients with schizophrenia compared to neurotypical controls. Moreover, dynamic time-varying mea-sures of cross

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20799

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Menon, V.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Menon, Vinod
ORCID
Menon, Vinod
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-15
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
309-310
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
DOI
10.1002/wps.20799
OpenAlex
W3087287407
Cited by
88
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
cognitive impairment, mental illness, large-scale brain networks, cognitive control, salience network, frontoparietal network, default mode network, intrinsic functional connectivity, transdiagnostic mechanisms, working memory, goal-directed behavior, anterior insula, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, self-referential processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review