Cited by 91Digital Mental Health InterventionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Generative artificial intelligence in mental health care: potential benefits and current challenges

Open access
Torous, John, Blease, Charlotte·2024·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence in mental health care: potential benefits and current challengesThe potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care is being intensively discussed, given the easy accessibility of programs such as ChatGPT.While it is usually acknowledged that this technology will never replace clinicians, we should be aware of imminent changes around AI supporting: a) routine office work such as billing, b) clinical documentation, c) medical education, and d) routine monitoring of symptoms.These changes will likely happen rapidly.In summer 2023, the largest electronic medical records provider in the US, Epic Systems, announced that it is partnering with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT technology 1 .The profound impact that these changes will have on the context and delivery of mental health care warrants attention, but often overlooked is the more fundamental question of changes to the nature of mental health care in terms of improving prevention, diagnosis and treatments.Research on non-clinical samples suggests that AI may augment text-based support programs, but assessments have focused on perceived empathy rather than clinical outcomes.While the former is an important development, it is only the first step towards progressing from feasibility to acceptability and from efficacy to effectiveness.A century of accessible self-help books, more than 60 years of mental health chatbots (Eliza was created in 1959), nearly 30 years of home Internet with access to free online cognitive behavioral therapy and chatrooms, over a decade of smartphone-based mental health apps and text message support programs, and the recent expansion of video-based telehealth, together highlight that access to resources is not a panacea for prevention.The true target for AI preventive programs should not be replicating previous work but rather developing new models able to provide personalized, environmentally and culturally responsive, and scalable support that works effectively for users across all countries and regions.Computer-based diagnosis programs have existed for decades and have not transformed care.Many studies to date suggest that new AI models can diagnose mental health conditions in the context of standardized exam questions or simple case examples 2 .This is important research, and there is evidence of improvement with new models, but the approach belies the clinical reality of how diagnosis is made or utilized in clinical care.The future of diagnosis in the 21st century can be more inclusive, draw from diverse sources of information, and be outcomes-driven.The true target for AI programs will be to integrate information from clinical exam, patient self-report, digital phenotyping, genetics, neuroimaging, and clinical judgement into novel diagnostic categories that may better reflect the underlying nature of mental illness and offer practical value in guiding effective treatments and cures.Currently, there is a lack of evidence about how AI programs can guide mental health treatment.Impressive studies show that AI can help select psychiatric medications 3 , but these studies often rely on complete and labelled data sets, which is not the clinical

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.21148

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [3]3. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A et al. PLoS Digit Health 2023;2:e0000198.
  2. [4]4. Sheu YH, Magdamo C, Miller M et al. NPJ Digit Med 2023;6:73.
  3. [5]5. Chen S, Kann BH, Foote MB et al. JAMA Oncol 2023; doi:10.1001/jamao ncol. 2023.2954. · DOI
  4. [6]6. Torous J, Myrick K, Aguilera A. World Psychiatry 2023;22:1-2.
  5. [7]7. Mittermaier M, Raza MM, Kvedar JC. NPJ Digit Med 2023;6:113.
  6. [8]8. King M. Lancet Psychiatry 2022;9:e48.
  7. [10]10. Sharp G, Torous J, West ML. J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e50696. DOI:10.1002/wps.21148

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Torous, J., & Blease, C.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01-12
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
1-2
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W4390793099
Cited by
90
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
generative AI, mental health services, ChatGPT, mental health chatbots, AI-assisted diagnosis, digital phenotyping, personalized treatment, mental health prevention, clinical documentation, telemedicine, clinical implementation of AI, human-AI collaboration, clinician role, mental health apps, digital mental health interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review