The benefits and future potential of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) on mental health: a Delphi study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose This study explores expert consensus on the benefits and future potential of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in mental health care, using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to interpret these perceptions.Methods A two-round Delphi study using a mixed-methods design was conducted with 15 purposively selected experts in psychiatry, clinical psychology, counselling, and digital mental health. Round 1 gathered open-ended responses that were thematically analysed to identify benefit and future-potential dimensions. In Round 2, experts ranked these dimensions, and consensus was assessed using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance.Results Twenty-eight themes were identified across eight benefit dimensions, and 29 themes across eight future-potential dimensions. Statistically significant consensus was achieved for both benefits (W = 0.145, p = 0.034) and future potential (W = 0.152, p = 0.025). Accessibility and availability ranked as the most important current benefit, while AI as a collaborative and informative tool was prioritised for future application.Discussion Experts perceived GAI as a transformative adjunct to mental health practice, particularly in expanding access, supporting personalised care, and augmenting professional capacity. Adoption is contingent on usability, transparency, trust, and robust ethical governance to ensure equitable and human-centred integration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLM-CBs' constant availability, non-judgmental attitudes, knowledge of psychotherapeutic concepts, and perceived empathy make them appear attractive as mental health support tools, especially in societies with logistical and resource-based limitations in mental health treatment.
“LLM-CBs’ constant availability, non-judgmental attitudes, knowledge of psychotherapeutic concepts, and perceived empathy make them appear as attractive mental health support tools149,150, especially in societies marked by logistical and resource-based limitations in mental health treatment151.”
From A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as [151]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map
Niederberger, M., & Spranger, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 · Cited by 1,072 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Fifteen experts with professional backgrounds in both technology and mental health participated, contributing diverse and specialised insights into the role of GAI in mental health practice (Niederberger & Spranger, 2020).”
Treatment and prevention of mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries
Patel, V., Araya, R., Chatterjee, S., Chisholm, D., Cohen, A., De Silva, M., Hosman, C., McGuire, H., Rojas, G., & van Ommeren, M. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61240-9 · Cited by 930 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…rather than as replacements, especially for individuals with severe or complex mental health conditions and for those living in areas with limited access to qualified professionals (Blease & Torous, 2023; Essien & Asamoah, 2020; Miner et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2007; Torous & Blease, 2024).”
Beiderbeck, D., Frevel, N., von der Gracht, H. A., Schmidt, S. L., & Schweitzer, V. M. (2021) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2021.101401 · Cited by 642 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fifteen mental health professionals were selected through purposive sampling to ensure a well-informed and contextually relevant expert panel (Beiderbeck et al., 2021).”
Friedman, C., Rubin, J., Brown, J., Buntin, M., Corn, M., Etheredge, L., Gunter, C., Musen, M., Platt, R., Stead, W., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002977 · Cited by 509 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These insights align with frameworks in learning health systems and precision public health that leverage data-driven approaches to improve intervention design (Elyoseph et al., 2023; Friedman et al., 2015; Xian, 2024).”
Abd-Alrazaq, A. A., Rababeh, A., Alajlani, M., Bewick, B. M., & Househ, M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16021 · Cited by 503 · cited 3× · see citing works
“A key advantage of naturalistic chatbots is their accessibility (Abd-Alrazaq et al., 2020).”
Sharma, A., Lin, I. W., Miner, A. S., Atkins, D. C., & Althoff, T. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00593-2 · Cited by 500 · cited 6× · see citing works
“For example, AI-powered chatbots and conversational agents can deliver evidence-based relaxation techniques and therapeutic dialogues that help users manage anxiety and depression (Abd-Alrazaq et al., 2020; Sharma et al., 2023).”
InfluentialCheong, B. C. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273 · Cited by 445 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent studies emphasise that transparency, fairness, and accountability are essential for trustworthy AI systems that protect patient autonomy and privacy while maintaining clinician–patient trust (Cheong, 2024; Ott & Dabrock, 2022).”
Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data
Lochmiller, C. (2021) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008 · Cited by 420 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Data were organised and coded manually using Microsoft Excel as a practical tool for sorting, labelling, and grouping responses (Lochmiller, 2021).”
ChatGPT outperforms humans in emotional awareness evaluations
Elyoseph, Z., Hadar-Shoval, D., Asraf, K., & Lvovsky, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199058 · Cited by 324 · cited 7× · see citing works
“By using natural language processing and machine learning, these tools can improve emotional regulation and user engagement in mental health self-care (Elyoseph et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023).”
InfluentialSendak, M. P., Ratliff, W., Sarro, D., Alderton, E., Futoma, J., Gao, M., Nichols, M., Revoir, M., Yashar, F., Miller, C., et al. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/15182 · Cited by 287 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These findings align with research indicating that AI can improve diagnostic accuracy and streamline administrative processes, enabling clinicians to devote more attention to direct patient care (Rollwage et al., 2024; Sendak et al., 2020).”
Exploring User Adoption of ChatGPT: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective
Ma, J., Wang, P., Li, B., Wang, T., Pang, X. S., & Wang, D. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2314358 · Cited by 278 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent research consistently confirms that PU remains one of the strongest predictors of technology adoption across diverse domains (Ma et al., 2025).”
Yu, P., Xu, H., Hu, X., & Deng, C. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11202776 · Cited by 267 · cited 2× · see citing works
“As emphasised in previous studies, ethically governed personalisation can strengthen therapeutic alliance without compromising user autonomy (Blease & Torous, 2023; Yu et al., 2023).”
Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review
Spranger, J., Homberg, A., Sonnberger, M., & Niederberger, M. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.025 · Cited by 262 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It was anticipated that the attendance of experts would provide valuable professional expertise and insights, significantly advancing this study (Spranger et al., 2022).”
Artificial intelligence and chatbots in psychiatry
Pham, K. T., Nabizadeh, A., & Selek, S. (2022) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-022-09973-8 · Cited by 241 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This vision aligns with broader healthcare innovations that employ machine learning to refine prediction accuracy and personalise care pathways (Al-Worafi et al., 2023; Pham et al., 2022).”
Saeidnia, H. R., Fotami, S. G. H., Lund, B. D., & Ghiasi, N. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13070381 · Cited by 202 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In mental health care, where confidentiality and empathy are vital, building transparent and ethically governed AI systems is a prerequisite for clinical acceptance and long-term integration into professional practice (Saeidnia et al., 2024; Svensson et al., 2025).”
Artificial Intelligence Augmented Qualitative Analysis: The Way of the Future?
Hitch, D. (2023) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/10497323231217392 · Cited by 201 · cited 4× · see citing works
“However, researchers have also raised concerns about potential limitations, including algorithmic bias, the risk of overreliance on AI-generated empathy, and the lack of human accountability in automated interactions (Blease & Torous, 2023; Hitch, 2023).”
InfluentialThe now and future of ChatGPT and GPT in psychiatry
Cheng, S., Chang, C., Chang, W., Wang, H., Liang, C., Kishimoto, T., Chang, J. P., Kuo, J. S., & Su, K. (2023) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13588 · Cited by 197 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Scholars have called for clear guidelines to ensure that AI enhances rather than replaces human expertise and clinical judgement (Cheng et al., 2023; Doraiswamy et al., 2020).”
AI Chatbots in Digital Mental Health
Balcombe, L. (2023) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics10040082 · Cited by 170 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Previous research has similarly underscored that conversational AI can deliver empa-thetic, language-based interactions that facilitate early symptom identification and emotional regulation (Balcombe, 2023; Ettman & Galea, 2023).”
InfluentialAl-Abdullatif, A. M. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14111209 · Cited by 169 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Studies have shown that usability and accessibility significantly influence user trust and intention to use a system (Al-Abdullatif, 2024).”
Third-party evaluators perceive AI as more compassionate than expert humans
Ovsyannikova, D., de Mello, V. O., & Inzlicht, M. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00182-6 · Cited by 143 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Attitude toward use reflects an individual’s overall positive or negative feeling toward using a technology and is a direct predictor of behavioural intention (Ovsyannikova et al., 2025).”
Lessons Learned from a Two-Round Delphi-based Scenario Study
Schmalz, U., Spinler, S., & Ringbeck, J. (2020) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2020.101179 · Cited by 138 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The interpretation of the findings relies heavily on the expertise and judgement of the participating professionals (Schmalz et al., 2021).”
Humphrey-Murto, S., Wood, T. J., Gonsalves, C., Mascioli, K., & Varpio, L. (2020) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002887 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Deveci, M., Özcan, E., John, R. I., Covrig, C., & Pamucar, D. S. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110916 · Cited by 132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This analytical process enabled categorising expert inputs into coherent thematic dimensions, which subsequently informed the structure of the second-round questionnaire (Deveci et al., 2020).”
Artificial intelligence in the era of ChatGPT - Opportunities and challenges in mental health care
Singh, O. P. (2023) · Indian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_112_23 · Cited by 131 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For instance, OpenAI introduced the Chat Generative Pre-training Transformer (ChatGPT) on November 30, 2022, as a highly capable conversational system developed in San Francisco (Singh, 2023).”
ChatGPT and mental healthcare: balancing benefits with risks of harms
Blease, C., & Torous, J. (2023) · BMJ Mental Health · doi:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300884 · Cited by 122 · cited 10× · see citing works
“This perception underscores the importance of trust, a critical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model in mental health contexts (Blease & Torous, 2023).”
InfluentialKauttonen, J., Rousi, R. A., & Alamäki, A. V. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/65567 · Cited by 120 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Empirical studies in healthcare and AI adoption consistently find that trust mediates between user intention and acceptance, while perceived risk negatively influences acceptance (Goh et al., 2024; Kauttonen et al., 2025).”
Boel, A., Navarro-Compán, V., Landewé, R., & van der Heijde, D. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.034 · Cited by 118 · cited 2× · see citing works
“They were required to assign distinct rankings without duplication to ensure clarity and to facilitate statistical analysis (Boel et al., 2021).”
Naidu, K., & Sevnarayan, K. (2023) · Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies · doi:10.30935/ojcmt/13291 · Cited by 112 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Trained on extensive textual data, GAI can produce written responses that resemble human language and thought patterns (Naidu & Sevnarayan, 2023).”
AI-Based and Digital Mental Health Apps: Balancing Need and Risk
Hamdoun, S., Monteleone, R., Bookman, T., & Michael, K. (2023) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2023.3241309 · Cited by 104 · cited 2× · see citing works
“By supporting administrative functions and providing structured assistance based on evidence-informed therapeutic principles, GAI can reduce workload pressures and enhance efficiency (Hamdoun et al., 2023).”
Could artificial intelligence write mental health nursing care plans?
Woodnutt, S., Allen, C., Snowden, J., Flynn, M., Hall, S., Libberton, P., & Purvis, F. (2023) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.12965 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the field of healthcare, AI has been widely applied to support evaluation activities, such as algorithmic data processing, and to drive innovations in robotics, smart devices, and automated medication delivery systems (Al-Worafi et al., 2023; Woodnutt et al., 2024).”
Shen, J., DiPaola, D., Ali, S., Sap, M., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/62679 · Cited by 92 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Users who perceive AI systems as empathetic, reliable, and beneficial are significantly more willing to continue using them (Shen et al., 2024).”
Wah, J. N. K. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1530799 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Studies show that intuitive and emotionally attuned conversational AI systems, such as hybrid chatbots, enhance engagement, reduce communication anxiety, and foster a sense of therapeutic presence (Wah, 2025).”
Generative artificial intelligence in mental health care: potential benefits and current challenges
Torous, J., & Blease, C. (2024) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21148 · Cited by 90 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Strengthening transparency, accountability, and cultural sensitivity can reinforce trust, shape positive professional attitudes, and ultimately support the responsible global adoption of GAI systems (Blease & Torous, 2023; Doraiswamy et al., 2020; Torous & Blease, 2024).”
InfluentialAl‐Worafi, Y. M., Hermansyah, A., Tan, C. S., Choo, C., Bouyahya, A., Paneerselvam, G. S., Liew, K. B., Goh, K. W., & Ming, L. C. (2023) · Progress In Microbes & Molecular Biology · doi:10.36877/pmmb.a0000337 · Cited by 85 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This vision aligns with broader healthcare innovations that employ machine learning to refine prediction accuracy and personalise care pathways (Al-Worafi et al., 2023; Pham et al., 2022).”
Balaskas, S., Tsiantos, V., Chatzifotiou, S., & Rigou, M. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16020082 · Cited by 81 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Users are more likely to adopt digital systems when they believe that ethical standards, data privacy, and accountability are well established (Balaskas et al., 2025; Choudhury et al., 2025).”
Babu, A., & Joseph, A. P. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378904 · Cited by 77 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Ease of interaction has also been shown to reduce anxiety around technology use and encourage sustained engagement, especially when conversational agents maintain human-like empathy and clarity (Babu & Joseph, 2024).”
Howcroft, A., Bennett‐Weston, A., Khan, A. H., Griffiths, J., Gay, S. P., & Howick, J. (2025) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldaf017 · Cited by 76 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Such adaptability aligns with earlier findings that natural-language models, such as ChatGPT, can generate empathetic and contextually sensitive responses that enhance engagement and emotional support (Elyoseph et al., 2023; Howcroft et al., 2025).”
InfluentialSafety of Large Language Models in Addressing Depression
Heston, T. F. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.50729 · Cited by 61 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In mental health contexts, simple, clear, and responsive conversational systems help create a sense of comfort and psychological safety for both clinicians and patients (Heston, 2023).”
The Delphi technique: a tutorial
Naisola-Ruiter, V. (2022) · Research in Hospitality Management · doi:10.1080/22243534.2022.2080942 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This study employed thematic analysis to systematically and credibly capture and interpret expert perspectives (Naisola-Ruiter, 2022).”
Rollwage, M., Juechems, K., Habicht, J., Carrington, B., Hauser, T. U., & Harper, R. J. (2024) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001110 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The Potential Influence of AI on Population Mental Health
Ettman, C. K., & Galea, S. (2023) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/49936 · Cited by 48 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Previous research has similarly underscored that conversational AI can deliver empa-thetic, language-based interactions that facilitate early symptom identification and emotional regulation (Balcombe, 2023; Ettman & Galea, 2023).”
InfluentialInducing Positive Perspectives with Text Reframing
Ziems, C., Li, M., Zhang, A. L., & Yang, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.257 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Tee, M., Rasli, A., Toh, J. S., Abas, I. H., Fei, Z., & Liew, C. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013974 · Cited by 43 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A two-round Delphi technique was employed to facilitate iterative data collection and analysis (Tee et al., 2022).”
ChatCounselor: A Large Language Models for Mental Health SupportPreprint
Liu, J. M., Li, D., Cao, H., Ren, T., Liao, Z., & Wu, J. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.15461 · Cited by 43 · cited 6× · see citing works
“By using natural language processing and machine learning, these tools can improve emotional regulation and user engagement in mental health self-care (Elyoseph et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023).”
InfluentialDevelopment of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study
Parker, G., Kastner, M., Born, K. B., & Berta, W. B. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06501-5 · Cited by 38 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The ranking procedure required experts to assign unique numerical values to each item, ensuring clarity, eliminating duplicate rankings, and enhancing statistical validity (Parker et al., 2021).”
Ratta, R., Sodhi, J., & Saxana, U. (2025) · Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.34190/ejkm.23.1.3499 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Over the years, TAM has been expanded to include additional dimensions such as trust, risk perception, and ethical awareness, particularly in fields involving sensitive human interaction such as healthcare (Ko & Leem, 2021; Ratta et al., 2025).”
Reviewing the Common Barriers to the Mental Healthcare Delivery in Africa
Essien, B., & Asamoah, M. K. (2020) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-020-01059-8 · Cited by 35 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…rather than as replacements, especially for individuals with severe or complex mental health conditions and for those living in areas with limited access to qualified professionals (Blease & Torous, 2023; Essien & Asamoah, 2020; Miner et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2007; Torous & Blease, 2024).”
Choudhury, A., Shahsavar, Y., & Shamszare, H. (2025) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/72867 · Cited by 35 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Users are more likely to adopt digital systems when they believe that ethical standards, data privacy, and accountability are well established (Balaskas et al., 2025; Choudhury et al., 2025).”
InfluentialIs ChatGPT ready to change mental healthcare? Challenges and considerations: a reality-check
Pandya, A., Lodha, P., & Ganatra, A. P. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2023.1289255 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“GAI, with its ability to conduct lifelike conversations, introduces a new form of self-guided online intervention for individuals experiencing symptoms of depression and anxiety (Pandya et al., 2023).”
Tate, S., Fouladvand, S., Chen, J. H., & Chen, C. A. (2023) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16341 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These findings align with earlier work, which has shown that AI-assisted responses can enhance both accuracy and empathy in patient interactions (Tate et al., 2023).”
Can ChatGPT pass a nursing exam?
Allen, C., & Woodnutt, S. (2023) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104522 · Cited by 27 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Future policies should therefore prioritise equitable usability, reliability, and ethical compliance to fulfil the democratising promise of GAI (Allen & Woodnutt, 2023).”
InfluentialKharko, A., McMillan, B., Hagström, J., Muli, I., Davidge, G., Hägglund, M., & Blease, C. (2024) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076241291384 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, occasional lapses in medical precision were noted (Kharko et al., 2024).”
Srivastava, R., & Srivastava, S. (2023) · Indian Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.25259/ijpc_155_2023 · Cited by 26 · cited 1× · see citing works
“GAI applications have been developed to provide counselling and emotional support, assist in early detection of symptoms, and promote psychoe-ducation (Liu et al., 2023; Srivastava & Srivastava, 2023).”
Goh, W. W. B., Chia, K. Y. A., Cheung, M. F. K., Kee, K. M., Lwin, M. O., Schulz, P. J., Chen, M., Wu, K., Ng, S. S. M., Lui, R. N.-S., et al. (2023) · JMIR AI · doi:10.2196/50525 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Empirical studies in healthcare and AI adoption consistently find that trust mediates between user intention and acceptance, while perceived risk negatively influences acceptance (Goh et al., 2024; Kauttonen et al., 2025).”
Building consensus in defining and conceptualizing acceptability of healthcare: A Delphi study
Bucyibaruta, J. B., Peu, M. D., Bamford, L., van der Wath, A., Dyer, T. A., Murphy, A. L., Gatabazi, P., Anokwuru, R., Muhire, I., Coetzee, C. A., et al. (2022) · Public Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/phn.13153 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Békés, V., Bőthe, B., & Doorn, K. A. (2025) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.70085 · Cited by 16 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Evidence suggests that when clinicians and patients perceive AI systems as helpful in improving therapeutic efficiency and the quality of emotional care, their intention to adopt and continue using these tools increases significantly (Békés et al., 2025).”
Ott, T., & Dabrock, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.902960 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent studies emphasise that transparency, fairness, and accountability are essential for trustworthy AI systems that protect patient autonomy and privacy while maintaining clinician–patient trust (Cheong, 2024; Ott & Dabrock, 2022).”
Svensson, E. M., Osika, W., & Carlbring, P. (2025) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2025.100844 · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In mental health care, where confidentiality and empathy are vital, building transparent and ethically governed AI systems is a prerequisite for clinical acceptance and long-term integration into professional practice (Saeidnia et al., 2024; Svensson et al., 2025).”
Fostering adolescent engagement in generative AI art therapy: a dual SEM-ANN analysis of emotional
Peng, X., Qian, Y. H., & Bao, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1628471 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the context of mental health, positive emotional experiences when interacting with AI-assisted tools can strengthen engagement and trust (Peng et al., 2025).”
Is ChatGPT worth using in first aid for mental health issues?
Aditama, M. H. R., Mangantes, M. L., & Tiwa, T. M. (2023) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdad095 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Within the field of mental health, GAI applications such as ChatGPT are receiving increasing attention for their ability to provide personalised support, facilitate therapeutic interactions, and assist in mental health assessments (Aditama et al., 2023).”
Unveiling the Future: How Can GAI Transform Mental Health Care?
Xian, X. (2024) · The Journal of Medicine Humanity and Media · doi:10.62787/mhm.v2i1.49 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These insights align with frameworks in learning health systems and precision public health that leverage data-driven approaches to improve intervention design (Elyoseph et al., 2023; Friedman et al., 2015; Xian, 2024).”
Microsoft AI Expert: APA, MH Professionals Must Help Guide Future of AI and Mental Health
Moran, M. (2024) · Psychiatric News · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2024.05.5.10 · Cited by 1 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Studies have argued that mental health professionals must actively shape how AI is integrated into psychiatric care to ensure that its deployment aligns with ethical, clinical, and empathic standards (Moran, 2024).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205(219), 5.
- Doraiswamy, P. M., Blease, C., & Bodner, K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Insights from a global physician survey. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 46. 10.1038/s41746-020-0222-7 31980092 · DOI
- Ko, Y. H., & Leem, C. S. (2021). The influence of AI technology acceptance and ethical awareness towards intention to use. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(3), 217– 225.
- Miner, A. S., Milstein, A., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Talking to machines about personal mental health problems. JAMA: The journal of the American Medical Association, 324(5), 435– 436. 10.1001/jama.2020.10639 28973225 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots
Diel, A., Torous, J., Cuijpers, P., Kleesiek, J., Nensa, F., Weber, N., Faust, F., Lalgi, T. J., Mellis, F. S., Teufel, M., et al. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-03054-x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Diel, A., Weber, N., Beckord, J., Lalgi, T. J., Jansen, C., Skoda, E., Dörrie, N., Musche, V., Robitzsch, A., Teufel, M., et al. (2026) · JMIR AI · doi:10.2196/104297
Tettey, J., Abdulazeez, H. A., Yusuff, T. A., Olabanji, O., & Akor, J. T. (2026) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.63946/jebm/18769
Wider, W., Suo, Z., Li, H., Harichandra, T., Liu, C., & Wu, H. (2026) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.71455
Self-citationXiao, W., Zhang, H., Chen, X., Cai, J., 駱旭琛, & Deng, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1956736
“In addition, limited attention has been given to caregiver-centered questions, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, cognitive impairment, self-neglect, and the distinction between depressive symptoms and acute medical deterioration (32).”
- Authors
- Oo, C. T. L., Wider, W., Pang, N. T. P., Koh, E. B. Y., Vasanthi, R. K., Thet, K. Z. Z., Ramalho, R., Özdemir, B. N., & Mahboob, K.
- Affiliations
- INTI International University (MY)
- Universiti of Malaysia Sabah (MY)
- Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Emergency Medicine Department, Atatürk State Hospital
- Ayub Medical College (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Wider, Walton
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2026-01-27
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2621802-2621802
- ISSN
- 1748-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-2631
- PMC
- PMC12849804
- OpenAlex
- W7125814150
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 29.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- generative AI, mental health services, expert consensus, technology acceptance model, digital mental health, access to mental health care, individualized care, professional capacity, trust in AI, ethical AI governance, human-centered AI
- MeSH terms
- Generative Artificial Intelligence, Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Delphi Technique, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Psychiatry, Psychology, Clinical, Surveys and Questionnaires, Consensus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review