The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global metabolite analysis of yeast: evaluation of sample preparation methods
Abstract
Sample preparation is considered one of the limiting steps in microbial metabolome analysis. Eukaryotes and prokaryotes behave very differently during the several steps of classical sample preparation methods for analysis of metabolites. Even within the eukaryote kingdom there is a vast diversity of cell structures that make it imprudent to blindly adopt protocols that were designed for a specific group of microorganisms. We have therefore reviewed and evaluated the whole sample preparation procedures for analysis of yeast metabolites. Our focus has been on the current needs in metabolome analysis, which is the analysis of a large number of metabolites with very diverse chemical and physical properties. This work reports the leakage of intracellular metabolites observed during quenching yeast cells with cold methanol solution, the efficacy of six different methods for the extraction of intracellular metabolites, and the losses noticed during sample concentration by lyophilization and solvent evaporation. A more reliable procedure is suggested for quenching yeast cells with cold methanol solution, followed by extraction of intracellular metabolites by pure methanol. The method can be combined with reduced pressure solvent evaporation and therefore represents an attractive sample preparation procedure for high‐throughput metabolome analysis of yeasts. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metabolomics and systems biology: making sense of the soup
KELL, D. (2004) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2004.04.012 · Cited by 529
Cited by
Beckonert, O., Keun, H. C., Ebbels, T. M. D., Bundy, J., Holmes, E., Lindon, J. C., & Nicholson, J. K. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.376 · Cited by 2,109
The growing role of precision and personalized medicine for cancer treatment
Krzyszczyk, P., Acevedo, A., Davidoff, E. J., Timmins, L. M., Marrero-Berrios, I., Patel, M., White, C., Lowe, C., Sherba, J. J., Hartmanshenn, C., et al. (2018) · TECHNOLOGY · doi:10.1142/s2339547818300020 · Cited by 698
Integrated omics: tools, advances and future approaches
Misra, B. B., Langefeld, C., Olivier, M., & Cox, L. A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/jme-18-0055 · Cited by 686
Bajad, S. U., Lu, W., Kimball, E. H., Yuan, J., Peterson, C., & Rabinowitz, J. D. (2006) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.019 · Cited by 592
Dynamics of the Cellular Metabolome during Human Cytomegalovirus Infection
Munger, J., Bajad, S. U., Coller, H. A., Shenk, T., & Rabinowitz, J. D. (2006) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0020132 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Villas‐Bôas, S. G., Højer‐Pedersen, J., Åkesson, M., Smedsgaard, J., & Nielsen, J.
- Venue
- Yeast
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-21
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1155-1169
- ISSN
- 0749-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0061
- OpenAlex
- W2028400128
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global metabolite analysis of yeast: evaluation of sample preparation methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/yea.1308
- The paper
- Villas‐Bôas, S. G., Højer‐Pedersen, J., Åkesson, M., Smedsgaard, J., & Nielsen, J. (2005). Global metabolite analysis of yeast: evaluation of sample preparation methods. Yeast. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
