Cited by 100Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Environmental influences on the activity of captive apes

Wilson, Susan F.·1982·Zoo Biology

Abstract

Forty‐one zoological gardens in seven European countries were visited to investigate activity level in captive environments for great apes. Forty‐three groups of gorillas and 68 groups of orangutans were observed. The seven factors quantified for each of the environments were size of the enclosure, usable surface area, frequency of feeding, number of animals, and number of objects (stationary, temporary, and movable). Activity level of each group was measured by instantaneous scan sampling for one hour on two consecutive days. For both species, the factors most highly related to activity level were number of animals, and stationary, temporary, and movable objects. The usefulness of these variables for predicting group activity level was different for the two species, however. Factors important for gorillas were stationary and temporary objects, while stationary and movable objects were significant for orangutans. These findings suggest that objects within environments may be more important for captive apes than the size or construction of the enclosure. Also, the types of objects that need to be included in environments may be related to the natural behavior of the individual species.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.1430010304

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1093/icb/14.1.221 · DOI
  2. Erwin J., 1979, Captivity and Behavior, 139
  3. Erwin J., 1979, Captivity and Behavior, 1
  4. Fox M. W., 1971, Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine, 47
  5. 10.1126/science.148.3670.666-a · DOI
  6. Hediger H., 1950, Wild Animals in Captivity
  7. Jones C., 1971, Rio Mundi, West Africa
  8. 10.1016/S0003-3472(74)80054-0 · DOI
  9. Maple T., 1979, Captivity and Behavior, 239
  10. Markowit H., 1979, Captivity and Behavior, 217
  11. 10.1007/BF02383137 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/h0030355 · DOI
  13. Morris D., 1964, The response of animals to a restricted environment, Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 13, 99
  14. Nie N. H., 1975, Statistical Package For the Social Sciences
  15. Sackett G. P., 1968, Abnormal Behavior in Animals, 293
  16. Schaller G. B., 1963, The Mountain Gorilla
  17. 10.1159/000155482 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Susan F.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-01
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
201-209
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W2050481813
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
captive apes, great apes, gorillas, orangutans, activity level, environmental enrichment, group size, feeding frequency, zoo animal welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review