The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental influences on the activity of captive apes
Abstract
Forty‐one zoological gardens in seven European countries were visited to investigate activity level in captive environments for great apes. Forty‐three groups of gorillas and 68 groups of orangutans were observed. The seven factors quantified for each of the environments were size of the enclosure, usable surface area, frequency of feeding, number of animals, and number of objects (stationary, temporary, and movable). Activity level of each group was measured by instantaneous scan sampling for one hour on two consecutive days. For both species, the factors most highly related to activity level were number of animals, and stationary, temporary, and movable objects. The usefulness of these variables for predicting group activity level was different for the two species, however. Factors important for gorillas were stationary and temporary objects, while stationary and movable objects were significant for orangutans. These findings suggest that objects within environments may be more important for captive apes than the size or construction of the enclosure. Also, the types of objects that need to be included in environments may be related to the natural behavior of the individual species.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of objects such as furnishings in the enclosure increases activity levels in captive orang utans.
“as does the presence of objects such as furnishings in the enclosure (Perkins 1992;Wilson 1982;Stevenson 1983)”
From Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orang-utans (2002) · cites this paper as Wilson 1982
The presence of fresh browse increased overall activity and foraging for small food items beneath the browse material.
“The presence of fresh browse increased overall activity and foraging for small food items beneath the browse material”
From Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orang-utans (2002) · cites this paper as Wilson 1982
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1093/icb/14.1.221 · DOI
- Erwin J., 1979, Captivity and Behavior, 139
- Erwin J., 1979, Captivity and Behavior, 1
- Fox M. W., 1971, Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine, 47
- 10.1126/science.148.3670.666-a · DOI
- Hediger H., 1950, Wild Animals in Captivity
- Jones C., 1971, Rio Mundi, West Africa
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(74)80054-0 · DOI
- Maple T., 1979, Captivity and Behavior, 239
- Markowit H., 1979, Captivity and Behavior, 217
- 10.1007/BF02383137 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0030355 · DOI
- Morris D., 1964, The response of animals to a restricted environment, Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 13, 99
- Nie N. H., 1975, Statistical Package For the Social Sciences
- Sackett G. P., 1968, Abnormal Behavior in Animals, 293
- Schaller G. B., 1963, The Mountain Gorilla
- 10.1159/000155482 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sources of stress in captivity
Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032 · Cited by 1,085
How does the zoo environment affect the behaviour of captive primates?
Hosey, G. R. (2005) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.015 · Cited by 362
A preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo
Hosey, G. (2008) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.013 · Cited by 197
Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orang-utans
Birke, L. (2002) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600028141 · Cited by 151
Post-occupancy evaluation in the zoo
Maple, T. L., & Finlay, T. W. (1987) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/0168-1591(87)90250-4 · Cited by 58
Crast, J., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Jonesteller, T. (2015) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22430 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Susan F.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201-209
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2050481813
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Keywords
- captive apes, great apes, gorillas, orangutans, activity level, environmental enrichment, group size, feeding frequency, zoo animal welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review