The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimate of chitin in raw whole insects
Abstract
Insects contain significant amounts of fiber as measured by crude fiber, acid detergent fiber (ADF) or neutral detergent fiber (NDF). It has always been assumed that the fiber in insects represents chitin based on the structural similarity between cellulose and chitin and the fact that the ADF fraction from insects contains nitrogen. In this study, a number of insect species that are raised commercially as food for insectivores were analyzed for moisture, crude protein (nitrogen × 6.25), fat, ash, NDF, ADF, and amino acids. Additionally, the ADF fraction was analyzed for nitrogen and amino acids to determine if proteins might be present in the ADF fraction. The ADF fraction contained a significant amount of amino acids accounting for 9.3–32.7% of the ADF (by weight). The presence of amino acids in the ADF fraction means that using ADF to estimate insect chitin results in an overestimation of insect chitin content. Using ADF adjusted for its amino acid content, the estimated chitin content of these insect species ranged from 2.7–49.8 mg/kg (as is) and 11.6–137.2 mg/kg (dry matter basis). Additionally, these data suggest that for the species measured here the amount of chitin nitrogen is quite small (as a % of total nitrogen) and that crude protein (nitrogen × 6.25) provides a reasonable estimate of the true protein for most species of insects. Zoo Biol 0:1–11, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tomberlin, J. K., Sheppard, D. C., & Joyce, J. A. (2002) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0379:slhtob]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 363
Cited by
Spranghers, T., Ottoboni, M., Klootwijk, C., Ovyn, A., Deboosere, S., De Meulenaer, B., Michiels, J., Eeckhout, M., De Clercq, P., & De Smet, S. (2017) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8081 · Cited by 970
Meneguz, M., Schiavone, A., Gai, F., Dama, A., Lussiana, C., Renna, M., & Gasco, L. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9127 · Cited by 532
Surendra, K. C., Tomberlin, J. K., van Huis, A., Cammack, J. A., Heckmann, L.-H. L., & Khanal, S. K. (2020) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.050 · Cited by 456
Edible insects: an alternative of nutritional, functional and bioactive compounds.
Jantzen da Silva Lucas, A., Menegon de Oliveira, L., da Rocha, M., & Prentice, C. (2020) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126022 · Cited by 412
Edible insects as future food: chances and challenges
Lange, K. W., & Nakamura, Y. (2021) · Journal of Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jfutfo.2021.10.001 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Finke, M. D.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-115
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2171188607
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimate of chitin in raw whole insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/zoo.20123
- The paper
- Finke, M. D. (2007). Estimate of chitin in raw whole insects. Zoo Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.