Cited by 970Insect Utilization and EffectsAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthInsect Pest Control Strategies

Nutritional composition of black soldier fly ( Hermetia illucens ) prepupae reared on different organic waste substrates

Open access
Spranghers, Thomas, Ottoboni, Matteo, Klootwijk, Cindy, Ovyn, Anneke, Deboosere, Stefaan, De Meulenaer, Bruno, Michiels, Joris, Eeckhout, Mia +2 more·2017·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Black soldier fly larvae are converters of organic waste into edible biomass, of which the composition may depend on the substrate. In this study, larvae were grown on four substrates: chicken feed, vegetable waste, biogas digestate, and restaurant waste. Samples of prepupae and substrates were freeze‐dried and proximate, amino acid, fatty acid and mineral analyses were performed. RESULTS: Protein content of prepupae varied between 399 and 431 g kg −1 dry matter ( DM ) among treatments. Differences in amino acid profile of prepupae were small. On the other hand, the ether extract ( EE ) and ash contents differed substantially. Prepupae reared on digestate were low in EE and high in ash (218 and 197 g kg −1 DM , respectively) compared to those reared on vegetable waste (371 and 96 g kg −1 DM , respectively), chicken feed (336 and 100 g kg −1 DM , respectively) and restaurant waste (386 and 27 g kg −1 DM , respectively). Prepupal fatty acid profiles were characterised by high levels of C12 :0 in all treatments. CONCLUSION: Since protein content and quality were high and comparable for prepupae reared on different substrates, black soldier fly could be an interesting protein source for animal feeds. However, differences in EE and ash content as a function of substrate should be considered. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.8081

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spranghers, T., Ottoboni, M., Klootwijk, C., Ovyn, A., Deboosere, S., De Meulenaer, B., Michiels, J., Eeckhout, M., De Clercq, P., & De Smet, S.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Trevi NV Dulle‐Grietlaan 17/1 B‐9050 Gentbrugge Belgium
  • Department of Food Safety and Food Quality Ghent University Coupure links 653 B‐9000 Gent Belgium
  • Department of Crop Protection Ghent University Coupure links 653 B‐9000 Gent Belgium
  • Department of Animal Production Ghent University Coupure links 653 B‐9000 Gent Belgium
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-14
Volume
97
Issue
8
Pages
2594-2600
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W2530368439
Cited by
970
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 14
FWCI
46.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
“Special Research Fund” (BOF) of Ghent University (05V00413)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
Hermetia illucens, prepupae, nutritional composition, organic waste substrates, biogas digestate, vegetable waste, restaurant waste, chicken feed, protein content, amino acid composition, fatty acid composition, crude fat, ash content, alternative protein sources, insect feed
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Chickens, Manure, Pupa, Simuliidae, Waste Products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review