Cited by 51Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

Do naturalistic enclosures provide suitable environments for zoo animals?

Fàbregas, María C., Guillén‐Salazar, Federico, Garcés‐Narro, Carlos·2012·Zoo Biology

Abstract

Zoo visitors perceive naturalistic enclosures (i.e. those attempting to replicate identifiable parts of the landscape of the species' habitat) as those that best satisfy the biological needs of the animals, and ensure therefore their welfare. However, the provision of a suitable environment with the resources that will allow the animals to satisfy their main biological needs in naturalistic enclosures has never been systematically explored; instead, it has been assumed. In this study we provide evidence that supports the general idea that naturalistic designs provide suitable environments for the animals. For that purpose, we analyzed 1,381 naturalistic and non-naturalistic enclosures in 63 Spanish zoological parks. In order to assess the suitability of the environment provided within each enclosure, a number of aspects related to the animals' main biological requirements were analyzed. We found a relationship between naturalistic designs and the suitability of the environment for the species housed. Most naturalistic enclosures (77.8%) provided suitable environments for their inhabitants. Non-naturalistic ones also had suitable environments, but in a lower percentage (39.7%). These results should be taken into account during zoo inspection and accreditation appointments, where enclosure suitability must be assessed in an accurate and fast manner. In this regard, a naturalistic design can be used as an adjunct indicator of enclosure suitability, but not exclusively, as not ev…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.20404

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fàbregas, M. C., Guillén‐Salazar, F., & Garcés‐Narro, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU (ES)
  • P.A.S.A.C.T.A., Veterinary Faculty Cardenal Herrera University Moncada (Valencia) Spain
Corresponding author
Fàbregas, María C.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-17
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
362-373
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W1943195642
Cited by
51
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
zoo animal welfare
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Environment, Controlled, Housing, Animal, Spain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review