Cited by 48Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Effects of guest feeding programs on captive giraffe behavior: Guest Feeding Impacts on Giraffe Behavior

Orban, David A., Siegford, Janice M., Snider, Richard J.·2016·Zoo Biology

Abstract

Zoological institutions develop human-animal interaction opportunities for visitors to advance missions of conservation, education, and recreation; however, the animal welfare implications largely have yet to be evaluated. This behavioral study was the first to quantify impacts of guest feeding programs on captive giraffe behavior and welfare, by documenting giraffe time budgets that included both normal and stereotypic behaviors. Thirty giraffes from nine zoos (six zoos with varying guest feeding programs and three without) were observed using both instantaneous scan sampling and continuous behavioral sampling techniques. All data were collected during summer 2012 and analyzed using linear mixed models. The degree of individual giraffe participation in guest feeding programs was positively associated with increased time spent idle and marginally associated with reduced time spent ruminating. Time spent participating in guest feeding programs had no effect on performance of stereotypic behaviors. When time spent eating routine diets was combined with time spent participating in guest feeding programs, individuals that spent more time engaged in total feeding behaviors tended to perform less oral stereotypic behavior such as object-licking and tongue-rolling. By extending foraging time and complexity, guest feeding programs have the potential to act as environmental enrichment and alleviate unfulfilled foraging motivations that may underlie oral stereotypic behaviors observed…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.21275

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study on giraffes found that time spent engaged in visitor feeding programs had no effect on the performance of stereotypic behaviour.

    “A study on giraffes found that time spent engaged in visitor feeding programs had no effect on the performance of stereotypic behaviour [150].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orban, D. A., Siegford, J. M., & Snider, R. J.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Orban, David A.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-22
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
157-166
ISSN
0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2284563787
Cited by
48
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Michigan State University Department of Zoology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
zoo animal welfare, stereotypy, time budget, environmental enrichment, human-animal interaction, foraging behavior, ruminating, idleness, zoo management
MeSH terms
Giraffes, Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Stereotyped Behavior, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review