Cited by 358Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesLipid metabolism and biosynthesis

Quantitative Analysis and Molecular Species Fingerprinting of Triacylglyceride Molecular Species Directly from Lipid Extracts of Biological Samples by Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Han, Xianlin, Gross, Richard W.·2001·Analytical Biochemistry

Abstract

Herein we describe a rapid, simple, and reliable method for the quantitative analysis and molecular species fingerprinting of triacylglycerides (TAG) directly from chloroform extracts of biological samples. Previous attempts at direct TAG quantitation by positive-ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI/MS) were confounded by the presence of overlapping peaks from choline glycerophospholipids requiring chromatographic separation of lipid extracts prior to ESI/MS analyses. By exploiting the rapid loss of phosphocholine from choline glycerophospholipids, in conjunction with neutral-loss scanning for individual fatty acids, overlapping peaks in the ESI mass spectrum were deconvoluted generating a detailed molecular species fingerprint of individual TAG molecular species directly from chloroform extracts of biological samples. This method readily detects as little as 0.1 pmol of each TAG molecular species from chloroform extracts and is linear over a 1000-fold dynamic range. The sensitivity of individual TAG molecular species to ESI/MS/MS analyses correlated with the unsaturation index and inversely correlated with total aliphatic chain length of TAG. An algorithm was developed which identifies sensitivity factors, thereby allowing the rapid quantitation and molecular species fingerprinting of TAG molecular species directly from chloroform extracts of biological samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/abio.2001.5178

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, X., & Gross, R. W.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Xianlin
Venue
Analytical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
295
Issue
1
Pages
88-100
ISSN
0003-2697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984044242
Cited by
358
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 32
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa011094-02)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (JDFI 996003)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA11094)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL057278, R02 HL 41250)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
triglycerides, choline glycerophospholipids, neutral loss scanning, fatty acid identification, sensitivity coefficients, unsaturation index, aliphatic chain length, lipidomics
MeSH terms
Animals, Lipids, Male, Myocardium, Triglycerides, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review