The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of grunts in reconciling opponents and facilitating interactions among adult female baboons
Open accessAbstract
Female baboons,Papio cynocephalus ursinus, often grunt when approaching lower-ranking females. These grunts appear to have a mollifying effect on subordinates. Observations of 19 adult females conducted over an 11-month period in the Okavango Delta, Botswana, revealed that high-ranking females were less likely to supplant more subordinate females, and more likely to engage in friendly interactions with them, when they grunted to their lower-ranking partners than when they remained silent. Grunts also functioned to reconcile opponents following fights. In a series of playback experiments, subjects were played the potentially threatening scream of a higher-ranking female that had recently attacked them. Subjects responded less strongly to these screams when the dominant opponent had apparently reconciled after the fight by grunting to them than when the opponent had not interacted with them again. Subjects' responses after a vocal ‘reconciliation’ were similar to their responses following a control period when the two females had not interacted at all. Even in the absence of more overt friendly behaviour, therefore, baboon grunts act to restore the relationship of opponents to baseline tolerance levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys
De Waal, F. B. M., & Yoshihara, D. (1983) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853983x00237 · Cited by 433
Cited by
Fischer, J., Kitchen, D. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2004) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0739-4 · Cited by 300
Self-citationA practical guide to the study of social relationships
Silk, J., Cheney, D., & Seyfarth, R. (2013) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.21367 · Cited by 252
Self-citationVariation in personality and fitness in wild female baboons
Seyfarth, R. M., Silk, J. B., & Cheney, D. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1210780109 · Cited by 123
Self-citationThe origin of meaning in animal signals
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2017) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.05.020 · Cited by 116
Self-citationAfrican elephant vocal communication I: antiphonal calling behaviour among affiliated females
Soltis, J., Leong, K., & Savage, A. (2005) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.11.015 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- CHENEY, D. L., SEYFARTH, R. M., & SILK, J. B.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 249-257
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987819885
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of grunts in reconciling opponents and facilitating interactions among adult female baboons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/anbe.1995.0237
- The paper
- CHENEY, D. L., SEYFARTH, R. M., & SILK, J. B. (1995). The role of grunts in reconciling opponents and facilitating interactions among adult female baboons. Animal Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1995.0237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.