Cited by 123Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Variation in personality and fitness in wild female baboons

Open access
Seyfarth, Robert M., Silk, Joan B., Cheney, Dorothy L.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Studies of personality in nonhuman primates have usually relied on assessments by humans and seldom considered the function of the resulting “trait” classifications. In contrast, we applied exploratory principal component analysis to seven behaviors among 45 wild female baboons over 7 y to determine whether the personality dimensions that emerged were associated with measures of reproductive success. We identified three relatively stable personality dimensions, each characterized by a distinct suite of behaviors that were not redundant with dominance rank or the availability of kin. Females scoring high on the “Nice” dimension were friendly to all females and often grunted to lower-ranking females to signal benign intent. “Aloof” females were aggressive, less friendly, and grunted primarily to higher-ranking females. “Loner” females were often alone, relatively unfriendly, and also grunted most often to higher-ranking females. Aloof and Loner females were rarely approached by others. Personality dimensions were correlated in different ways with three measures previously shown to be associated with fitness: stress levels and two behavioral indices reflecting the closeness of dyadic bonds formed by individuals. Females who scored high on Nice had high composite sociality indices (CSI) and stable partner preferences, whereas females who scored high on Aloof had lower CSI scores but significantly more stable partner preferences. Loner females had significantly lower CSI scores, less stable partner preferences, and significantly higher glucocorticoid levels. It remains to be determined which of the Nice or Aloof personality dimensions is more adaptive, or whether variation is maintained by contrasting effects on fitness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1210780109

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Freeman HD, Gosling SD (2010) Personality in nonhuman primates: A review and evaluation of past research. Am J Primatol 72:653-671.
  2. Uher J (2011) Personality and Temperament in Nonhuman Primates, eds Weiss A, King J, Murray L (Springer, New York), pp 41-76.
  3. Dingemanse NJ, Wolf M (2010) Recent models for adaptive personality differences: A review. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:3947-3958.
  4. Cheney D, Seyfarth R (2007) Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social Mind (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago).
  5. Crawley M (2005) Statistics: An Introduction Using R (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seyfarth, R. M., Silk, J. B., & Cheney, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology and
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-10
Volume
109
Issue
42
Pages
16980-16985
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1979577615
Cited by
123
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16
FWCI
17.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Leakey Foundation
  • National Geographic Society
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
personality, baboons, female reproductive success, social behavior, dominance rank, kinship, mate preferences, social bonds, stress, glucocorticoids, non-human primates, sociality
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Botswana, Feces, Female, Individuality, Papio, Personality, Physical Fitness, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Social Behavior, Observation, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review