The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diana monkey long-distance calls: messages for conspecifics and predators
Open accessAbstract
Primate long-distance calls have typically been interpreted as communication signals between conspecific groups (the ‘resource defence hypothesis’), but their potential role as anti-predator alarm calls has received comparably little attention. Male diana monkeys,Cercopithecus diana dianain the Taı̈ forest of Côte d’Ivoire often utter long-distance calls, either spontaneously or in reaction to a variety of stimuli, including predators and non-predators. The present study focuses only on predation contexts and provides evidence for communication to both predators and conspecifics. Males called only in response to predators whose hunting success depends on unprepared prey, that is, leopards and crowned hawk eagles, but not in response to pursuit hunters, such as chimpanzees and humans, which can pursue the caller in the canopy. Calling was regularly combined with approaching the predator. Both observations suggest that male long-distance calls are used to signal detection to the predator (‘perception advertisement hypothesis’). Analysis of male long-distance calls given to leopards and eagles showed that they differed according to a number of acoustic parameters. The two call variants were played to different diana monkey groups; conspecifics responded to them as though the original predator were present. We conclude that, in addition to their function in perception advertisement, diana monkey long-distance calls function as within-group semantic signals that denote different types of predators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Klump, G. M., & Shalter, M. D. (1984) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1984.tb01365.x · Cited by 378
The role of female diana monkeys, Cercopithecus diana, in territorial defence
Hill, C. M. (1994) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1056 · Cited by 30
Cited by
Manser, M. B. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1773 · Cited by 448
The microbiota-gut-brain axis: neurobehavioral correlates, health and sociality
Montiel-Castro, A. J., González-Cervantes, R. M., Bravo-Ruiseco, G., & Pacheco-López, G. (2013) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2013.00070 · Cited by 413
Rat 22kHz ultrasonic vocalizations as alarm cries
Litvin, Y., Blanchard, D. C., & Blanchard, R. J. (2007) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.038 · Cited by 242
Red colobus and Diana monkeys provide mutual protection against predators
BSHARY, R., & NOË, R. (1997) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0553 · Cited by 152
Self-citationThe origin of meaning in animal signals
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2017) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.05.020 · Cited by 116
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ZUBERBÜHLER, K., NOË, R., & SEYFARTH, R. M.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 589-604
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111264665
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diana monkey long-distance calls: messages for conspecifics and predators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/anbe.1996.0334
- The paper
- ZUBERBÜHLER, K., NOË, R., & SEYFARTH, R. M. (1997). Diana monkey long-distance calls: messages for conspecifics and predators. Animal Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.