The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Brazilian Cerrado Vegetation and Threats to its Biodiversity
Open accessAbstract
The Brazilian cerrado (savanna) biome covers 2 million km 2 representing 23% of the area of the country. It is an ancient biome with rich biodiversity, estimated at 160000 species of plants, fungi and animals. There are about 800 species of trees and large shrubs in the savanna vegetation and several times that number of ground species (herbs and subshrubs). When the flora of gallery forests, mesophytic forests and other habitats occurring in the biome are included, the total number of vascular plant species is estimated to reach about 10000. During the last 25 years modern agriculture has been developed in the cerrado to produce soya, maize, rice, etc and enormous numbers of cattle are raised in planted pastures. Charcoal production for the Brazilian steel industry also causes great destruction of the cerrado. By 1994 an estimated 695000 km 2 of cerrado (representing 35% of its area) had been converted to ‘anthropic landscape’. This compares to the destruction of about 400000 km 2 of Brazilian Amazonian forest representing 12 or 13% of the area of this biome. Conservation initiatives are now desperately needed. Only 1.5% of the cerrado biome is preserved as Federal Reserves and this area needs to be at least tripled. Surveys of the vascular flora aimed at discovering biogeographic patterns are now in progress with the objective of choosing representative areas and biodiversity ‘hot spots’ for conservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
Bond, W. J., Woodward, F. I., & Midgley, G. F. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x · Cited by 1,942
Simon, M. F., Grether, R., de Queiroz, L. P., Skema, C., Pennington, R. T., & Hughes, C. E. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903410106 · Cited by 1,056
Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil
Fearnside, P. M. (2001) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892901000030 · Cited by 702
Drought–mortality relationships for tropical forests
Phillips, O. L., van der Heijden, G., Lewis, S. L., López‐González, G., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Lloyd, J., Malhi, Y., Monteagudo, A., Almeida, S., Dávila, E. A., et al. (2010) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03359.x · Cited by 616
Atividade antioxidante de frutas do cerrado
Roesler, R., Malta, L. G., Carrasco, L. C., Holanda, R. B., Sousa, C. A. S., & Pastore, G. M. (2007) · Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos · doi:10.1590/s0101-20612007000100010 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- RATTER, J.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 223-230
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980621655
- Cited by
- 1,388
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Brazilian Cerrado Vegetation and Threats to its Biodiversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/anbo.1997.0469
- The paper
- RATTER, J. (1997). The Brazilian Cerrado Vegetation and Threats to its Biodiversity. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1997.0469
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.