The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumers» Cognitions With Regard to Genetically Modified Foods. Results of a Qualitative Study in Four Countries
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this research was to gain insight into consumers>> attitudes towards genetic modification in food production. With means-end chain theory as the theoretical basis, laddering interviews were conducted with 400 consumers in Denmark, Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy. Perceived risks and benefits of genetic modification in foods were investigated using beer and yoghurt as examples. German and Danish responses revealed more complex cognitive structures than did the results from the United Kingdom and Italy. In all four countries, however, applying genetic modification was associated with unnaturalness and low trustworthiness of the resulting products, independently of whether the genetically modified material was traceable in the product. Moral considerations were voiced as well, as were a number of other consequences that were perceived to conflict with both individual and social values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene technology, food production, and public opinion: a UK study
Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., & Frewer, L. J. (1994) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/bf01534445 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C. (2009) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x · Cited by 641
Costa-Font, M., Gil, J. M., & Traill, W. B. (2008) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002 · Cited by 543
If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers
Slade, P. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030 · Cited by 469
The Meaning of “Natural”: Process More Important Than Content
Rozin, P. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01589.x · Cited by 428
Bearth, A., Cousin, M.-E., & Siegrist, M. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.05.008 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- BREDAHL, L.
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 343-360
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984798838
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumers» Cognitions With Regard to Genetically Modified Foods. Results of a Qualitative Study in Four Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/appe.1999.0267
- The paper
- BREDAHL, L. (1999). Consumers» Cognitions With Regard to Genetically Modified Foods. Results of a Qualitative Study in Four Countries. Appetite. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
