The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food Values
Abstract
Because of the potential malleability of stated and revealed preferences for new food technologies and attributes, this research sought to determine consumers' food value systems by utilizing recent advances in best‐worst scaling. Based on previous literature related to human values and food preferences, a list of eleven food values was compiled. Results reveal that on average the values of safety, nutrition, taste, and price were among the most important to consumers, whereas the values of fairness, tradition, and origin were among the least important; however, there was significant heterogeneity in the relative importance placed on food values. Results indicate that food values are significantly related to consumers' stated and revealed preferences for organic food.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
A law of comparative judgment.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0070288 · Cited by 5,210
The Economic Approach to Human Behavior
Becker, G. S. (1976) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226217062.001.0001 · Cited by 5,027
Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross‐National Consumer Research
Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209528 · Cited by 4,750
Mixed MNL models for discrete response
McFadden, D., & Train, K. (2000) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::aid-jae570>3.0.co;2-1 · Cited by 4,322
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753930 · Cited by 3,890
(2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803475 · Cited by 2,987
A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes
Gutman, J. (1982) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/3203341 · Cited by 2,625
Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation.
Reynolds, T. J., & Gutman, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.4324/9781410600844-9 · Cited by 1,766
Padel, S., & Foster, C. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510611002 · Cited by 1,214
Cited by
de Araújo, P. D., Araújo, W. M. C., Patarata, L., & Fraqueza, M. J. (2022) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108952 · Cited by 186
Consumer preferences for upcycled ingredients: A case study with biscuits
Grasso, S., & Asioli, D. (2020) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103951 · Cited by 140
Mueller Loose, S., & Remaud, H. (2013) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070701311289920 · Cited by 129
Asioli, D., & Grasso, S. (2021) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104194 · Cited by 86
Nystrand, B. T., & Olsen, S. O. (2021) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2021.104736 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 184-196
- ISSN
- 0002-9092 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8276
- OpenAlex
- W4233684297
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food Values. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x
- The paper
- Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C. (2009). Food Values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
