Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR CORPORATE RISK DISCLOSURE EMERGING FROM THE AGENDA FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM

SOLOMON, JILL F., SOLOMON, ARIS, NORTON, SIMON D., JOSEPH, NATHAN L.·2000·The British Accounting Review
DOI 10.1006/bare.2000.0145
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/bare.2000.0145

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 1998, Accountancy, 12
  2. 1998, Accountancy, 20
  3. Arthur Andersen, 1996, ‘What’s the story? A survey of narrative reporting in annual reports’, Arthur Andersen
  4. 1997, Association of British Insurers
  5. Barker, 1998, ‘The market for information—evidence form finance directors, analysts and fund managers’, Accounting and Business Research, 29, 3, 10.1080/00014788.1998.9729563 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bartlett, 1997, ‘The corporate report and the private shareholder: Lee and Tweedie twenty years on’, British Accounting Review, 29, 245, 10.1006/bare.1996.0044 · DOI
  7. Besorai, 1995, ‘Disclosure of tentative information by listed companies —Part two’, The Company Lawyer, 16, 263
  8. Blackburn, 1999, ‘Managing risk and achieving Turnbull compliance’, Accountants’ Digest, 1
  9. Boritz, 1990, ‘Approaches to dealing with risk and uncertainty’, CICA Research Report
  10. 1992, Gee
  11. 1992, Gee
  12. Copp, 1998, ‘Re Astec BSR plc. corporate governance principles on trial’, The Company Lawyer, 19, 277
  13. Courtis, 1993, ‘Recent developments and frustrations in the corporate reporting process’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1, 18, 10.1111/j.1467-8683.1993.tb00005.x · DOI
  14. Davis-Friday, 1999, ‘The value relevance of financial statement recognition vs. disclosure: evidence from SFAS no. 106’, The Accounting Review, 74, 403, 10.2308/accr.1999.74.4.403 · DOI
  15. Demirag, 1995, ‘Accounting for financial and managerial causes of short-term pressures in British corporations’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 21, 1195, 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1994.tb00371.x · DOI
  16. Griffiths, 2000, 4, 1649
  17. Groves, 1999, ‘Identifying, developing and effectively implementing a risk management methodology which suits your company’s operating strategy and corporate culture’, Proactively Managing Business Risk and Ensuring Effective Internal Control in the Light of the Combined Code and the New Turnbull Committee Report
  18. Hermanson, 2000, ‘An analysis of the demand for reporting on internal control’, Accounting Horizons, 14, 325, 10.2308/acch.2000.14.3.325 · DOI
  19. Hershey, 1990, ‘The effects of expertise on financial problems solving: Evidence for goal-directed, problem-solving scripts’, Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 46, 77, 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90023-3 · DOI
  20. Ho, 1994, ‘The effect of experience on consensus of going-concern judgements’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 6, 160
  21. Holland, 1998, ‘Private disclosure and financial reporting, Accounting and Business Research, 28, 255, 10.1080/00014788.1998.9728914 · DOI
  22. Holland, 1996, ‘Dissemination of price-sensitive information and management of voluntary corporate disclosure’, Accounting and Business Research, 26, 295, 10.1080/00014788.1996.9729520 · DOI
  23. Hunton, 1994, ‘A framework for investigating involvement strategies in accounting information systems development’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 6, 128
  24. Huysman, 2000, ‘Rethinking organisational learning: Analyzing learning processes of information system designs’, Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 10, 81, 10.1016/S0959-8022(99)00018-1 · DOI
  25. 1998, ICAEW
  26. Jensen, 1976, ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305, 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X · DOI · Paper page
  27. Keasey, 1993, ‘Issues in Corporate accountability and governance’, Accounting and Business Research, 91a, 291, 10.1080/00014788.1993.9729897 · DOI
  28. 1994, London Stock Exchange
  29. Meyrick-Jones, 1999, ‘Effective strategies to ensure you overcome the barrier of corporate culture when adopting a proactive risk management approach’, Proactively Managing Business Risk and Ensuring Effective Internal Control in the Light of the Combined Code and the New Turnbull Committee Report
  30. 2000, a consultation document from The Company Law Review Steering Group
  31. Monks, 1994, ‘Relationship investing’, Corporate governance: An international review, 2, 58, 10.1111/j.1467-8683.1994.tb00058.x · DOI
  32. 1995, The National Association of Pension Funds Investment Committee
  33. 1997, National Association of Pension Funds Limited
  34. Pentland, 1995, ‘Information systems and organizational learning: The social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems, Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 5, 1, 10.1016/0959-8022(95)90011-X · DOI · Paper page
  35. Riley, 1992, ‘Contracting out of company law: Section 459 of the Companies Act 1985 and the role of the courts’, Modern Law Review, 55, 782, 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1992.tb00941.x · DOI
  36. Slakter, 1966, ‘Comparative validity of the chi-square and two modified chi-square goodness-of-fit-tests for small but equal expected frequencies’, Biometrika, 53, 619
  37. Smith, 1996, ‘Shareholder activism by institutional investors: evidence from CalPERS’, Journal of Finance, 51, 227, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05208.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. Solomon, 1999, ‘Empirical evidence of long-termism and shareholder activism in UK unit trusts’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7, 288, 10.1111/1467-8683.00159 · DOI
  39. Solomon, 2000, ‘A conceptual framework of conceptual frameworks: positioning corporate financial reporting and corporate environmental reporting on a continuum’, Discussion Paper, Sheffield University Management School, University of Sheffield
  40. Stamford, 1999, ‘Combined Code—Summary of Disclosures in December 1998 Accounts’, Conference Paper presented at, The Definitive Guide to the Combined Code and the New Turnbull Committee Report
  41. Stooke, 1996, ‘Reporting risk’, Accountancy, 128
  42. Swan, 2000, ‘Effects of Information load on capital budgeting decisions’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 12, 171
  43. 1999, The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
  44. Thomas, 1999, ‘Proactively managing business risk’, Proactively Managing Business Risk and Ensuring Effective Internal Control in the Light of the Combined Code and the New Turnbull Committee Report

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
SOLOMON, J. F., SOLOMON, A., NORTON, S. D., & JOSEPH, N. L.
Venue
The British Accounting Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-12
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
447-478
ISSN
0890-8389 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1006/bare.2000.0145
OpenAlex
W1971004801
Cited by
302
References
2
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.