Cited by 94Motor Control and AdaptationHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceTactile and Sensory Interactions

Timing and Force Components in Bilateral Transfer of Learning

Teixeira, Luis Augusto·2000·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Bilateral transfer of perceptual and motor components in movement control was investigated through two experiments. In Experiment 1 a simple anticipatory timing task was practiced with either the preferred or the nonpreferred hand. After a short resting interval an additional set of trials was performed with the contralateral hand. In Experiment 2, the same experimental design was used to investigate bilateral transfer of fine force control in a wrist-flexion movement. Analysis of the results showed that bilateral transfer of learning took place for both anticipatory timing and force control, with more noticeable transfer of training for the former. Asymmetry in transfer was found for force control, with significant transfer only in the preferred-to-nonpreferred direction. Transfer of anticipatory timing occurred similarly in both directions. These results indicated anticipatory timing as a powerful component for bilateral transfer, while force control showed to be more dependent on practice with the specific muscular system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/brcg.1999.1205

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motor-learning studies report stronger transfer from dominant- to nondominant-limb training.

    “motor-learning studies report stronger transfer from dominant- to nondominant-limb training (Teixeira, 2000)”
  • Similar directional asymmetries have been reported in motor learning.

    “Similar directional asymmetries have been reported in motor learning (Ikegami et al., 2010; Teixeira, 2000), raising the possibility that asymmetric transfer reflects a broader property of learning rather than a WM-specific phenomenon.”
  • Compared with nondominant-limb training, dominant-limb training results in more bilateral motor activation and stronger transfer, and a related pattern has been reported for discrete-to-rhythmic movement transfer.

    “For example, compared with nondominant-limb training, dominant-limb training results in more bilateral motor activation and stronger transfer (Teixeira, 2000), and a related pattern has been reported for discrete-to-rhythmic movement transfer (Ikegami et al., 2010; Schaal et al., 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teixeira, L. A.
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-12
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
455-469
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166283881
Cited by
94
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
anticipatory timing, force control, motor learning, motor control, handedness asymmetry, contralateral hand, wrist flexion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Functional Laterality, Learning, Movement, Random Allocation, Time Factors, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review