Cited by 0Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsCognitive Functions and Memory

The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Fu, Jiayi, Zhou, Yuxin, Yuan, Mingliang, Cai, Ying·2026·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Working memory (WM) training is widely used to enhance cognitive performance; however, its transfer to untrained tasks remains controversial. Traditional theories emphasize task similarity as the primary determinant of training transfer, but they cannot fully explain emerging evidence of asymmetric transfer across tasks. Two directional transfer hypotheses are proposed here to explain this asymmetry: the resource-based transfer advantage hypothesis predicts stronger transfer from more to less cognitively demanding tasks, whereas the ability-based transfer advantage hypothesis predicts stronger transfer from tasks engaging broader task-general abilities to tasks engaging task-specific narrower abilities. The contrast between span and updating paradigms provides an informative framework for distinguishing these accounts, because updating tasks are generally more cognitively demanding, whereas span tasks involve broader abilities. Accordingly, we conducted a three-level meta-analysis of 55 studies (208 effect sizes; N = 3,492). The results showed that updating training transferred reliably to span tasks ( g = 0.176, p < .001), whereas span training did not reliably transfer to updating tasks ( g = 0.048, p = .453), supporting the resource-based account. This advantage of updating training also extended to non-WM outcomes and was more pronounced at lower training doses, in non-adult samples, and with verbal stimuli. Together, these findings extend WM transfer theory beyond task similarity by highlighting the importance of cognitive demand and offer guidance for WM training design.

Verified 2026-10-08 · 4 references not checked yet

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This three-level meta-analysis of 55 studies (208 effect sizes; N = 3,492) finds asymmetric working memory training transfer: updating training reliably transfers to span tasks, whereas span training does not reliably transfer to updating tasks. The pattern supports a resource-based transfer advantage, with the updating advantage also extending to non-WM outcomes and appearing stronger at lower training doses, in non-adults, and with verbal stimuli.

Key findings

  • Overall cross-paradigm transfer between updating and span tasks was significant: Hedges’ g = 0.146, 95% CI [.077, .214], p < .001.
  • Updating-to-span transfer was reliable (g = 0.176, 95% CI [.104, .249], p < .001), while span-to-updating transfer was not (g = 0.048, 95% CI [−.078, .173], p = .453); the directional difference was marginal, F(1, 202) = 3.259, p = .073.
  • Updating training also transferred to non-WM outcomes (g = 0.120, 95% CI [0.048, 0.192], p = .001), whereas span training did not (g = 0.008, 95% CI [−0.102, 0.118], p = .885); the difference was marginal, F(1, 298) = 3.174, p = .076.
  • Asymmetry was significant in low-dose training (≤ 5 h; F(1, 57) = 4.551, p = .037), non-adults (F(1, 45) = 18.19, p < .001), and marginally in verbal-stimulus training (F(1, 40) = 3.346, p = .075), but not in high-dose, adult, or nonverbal subgroups.

Methods

  • Systematic review and three-level random-effects meta-analysis of adaptive WM training studies with control groups and pre/post transfer tests; 55 independent studies, 208 within-WM effect sizes, N = 3,492, plus 302 non-WM effect sizes.
  • Searches covered English- and Chinese-language databases through September 30, 2024; inclusion required healthy participants, adaptive span or updating training, and at least one untrained WM transfer task.
  • Hedges’ g quantified transfer; transfer direction was the primary moderator, with secondary moderators of training dosage, developmental stage, and stimulus domain; sensitivity and publication-bias analyses were also conducted.

Limitations

  • The paper states more studies examined updating-to-span than span-to-updating transfer, some moderator analyses had small numbers of studies, and some updating tasks may have been insufficiently sensitive to detect span-training transfer; this imbalance may risk overestimating asymmetry.
  • The paper states the meta-analysis included only healthy populations, so generalizability to clinical groups is unclear; it also notes limited power to test a storage–manipulation account directly and difficulty quantifying cognitive demand across domains.
  • Evident from the text: the key directional difference in the primary within-WM analysis was only marginal (p = .073), as was the non-WM directional difference (p = .076), and several subgroup asymmetries were not statistically significant.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-026-02994-5

Cites

115 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 14 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

32 of 67 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Evidence on training dosage and transfer is mixed.

    “early meta-analytic work reported positive associations between training amount and transfer effects (Weicker et al., 2016), whereas later syntheses reported little or no moderation by total training hours (Soveri et al., 2017a), or effects that were largely confined to the nearest transfer outcomes (You et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Weicker et al., 2016 source
    • cites Soveri et al., 2017a source
    • cites You et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    Children and adolescents often show larger or more efficient transfer.

    “Children and adolescents – those undergoing neurocognitive development – often show larger or more efficient transfer (Liu et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2018)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Liu et al., 2023 source
    • cites Zhao et al., 2018 source

      The Conclusion reports transfer effects in children but only a short-lived effect on the go/no-go task in young adults, suggesting greater potential for training-induced improvements in children. The study did not examine adolescents, and its findings do not establish that larger or more efficient transfer occurs often. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Meta-analyses have reported persistent critiques of similarity-based theories' explanatory limitations.

    “persistent critiques of these theories’ explanatory limitations have been reported by meta-analyses (Soveri et al., 2017a; You et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Soveri et al., 2017a source

      In “Mechanisms behind transfer” (page unavailable), Soveri et al. report that transfer was substantial mainly to untrained n-back tasks and suggest task-specific strategies rather than broadly improved working memory as an explanation. “Directions for future studies” cautions that overlooking task-specific effects can mislead theoretical explanations. These passages support a critique of one explanation for transfer, but they do not report persistent critiques of similarity-based theories as such. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites You et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    The relationship between baseline and training-related gains or transfer is inconsistent across studies.

    “the relationship between baseline and training-related gains or transfer is inconsistent across studies (Jaeggi et al., 2008; Wiemers et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jaeggi et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion reports that pretest fluid intelligence was not reliably related to training-related gains in fluid intelligence. This supplies one finding about baseline ability and transfer, but the paper does not establish that the relationship is inconsistent across studies. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wiemers et al., 2019 source
    • cites Zhu et al., 2017 source
  • Premisecitation

    WM training transfer to untrained tasks is limited.

    “The limited transfer of WM training to untrained tasks has long constrained its applications (Morrison & Chein, 2011; Zhao et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Morrison & Chein, 2011 source

      The ‘Lack of consistency in experimental methods and findings’ section reports both successful and failed transfer to untrained cognitive-control and fluid-intelligence tasks, supporting the view that transfer is limited or uncertain. The paper does not establish the broader historical claim that limited transfer has long constrained WM training’s applications; it also reports some successful transfer. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Zhao et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Perceptual learning studies report transfer from configuration to element learning but not the opposite.

    “Perceptual learning studies similarly report transfer from configuration to element learning but not the opposite”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gong et al., 2022 source

      The Discussion reports complete configuration-to-element transfer and an asymmetric pattern. It describes element-to-configuration transfer as weak, however, rather than absent, so “not the opposite” overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both span and updating recruit frontoparietal systems, with updating eliciting stronger and more widespread engagement.

    “Neuroimaging evidence likewise shows that both recruit frontoparietal systems, with updating eliciting stronger and more widespread engagement, which is consistent with greater cognitive demand (Rodríguez-Nieto et al., 2022; Wager & Smith, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rodríguez-Nieto et al., 2022 source

      Section 4.4 reports frontoparietal recruitment in both storage-related Recognition tasks and executive-component Updating tasks. It does not compare span tasks directly with updating; moreover, it describes the storage-related Recognition network as more distributed than the Manipulation and N-back networks, rather than the reverse. The proposed explanation in terms of greater cognitive demand is not established for a span-versus-updating comparison. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wager & Smith, 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Task similarity has dominated transfer frameworks for more than a century.

    “Since Thorndike’s common elements theory was established in the 1900 s, task similarity has dominated transfer frameworks for more than a century, centering on similarity as a primary determinant of training transfer likelihood (Waris et al., 2015; Woodworth & Thorndike, 1901).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Waris et al., 2015 source

      The Introduction and Discussion (pages unavailable) treat cognitive overlap between training and transfer tasks as a predictor of transfer strength. They do not establish that task similarity has dominated transfer frameworks since Thorndike’s theory or for more than a century. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Woodworth & Thorndike, 1901 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Evidence on stimulus domain and transfer is unclear/competing.

    “Some scholars argue that the novelty of visuospatial materials facilitates new learning and transfer (Gathercole et al., 2019; Norris et al., 2019), whereas competing evidence suggests stronger transfer following verbal WM training (Ni et al., 2023)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gathercole et al., 2019 source

      In Study 1, the paper proposes that training on spatial serial-recall tasks can develop new cognitive routines and produce robust transfer because an established visuospatial short-term-memory system may be absent. It does not attribute that effect to the novelty of visuospatial materials generally; its prediction concerns particular recall tasks, and the Study 1 Discussion says transfer across other kinds of visuospatial stimuli could not be tested. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Norris et al., 2019 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) proposes that the unfamiliar demands of a visual change-detection task may prompt a new cognitive routine that produces transfer. That supports a qualified link between novelty, learning and transfer, but not the broader claim that novelty of visuospatial materials generally facilitates transfer: the Results (page unavailable) found no substantial cross-domain transfer from circle-span training. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ni et al., 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Span performance primarily reflects storage/maintenance, whereas updating reflects maintenance plus additional manipulation/control components.

    “Latent-variable and theoretical evidence suggests that span performance primarily reflects storage/maintenance, whereas updating reflects maintenance plus additional manipulation/control components (Aben et al., 2012; Burgoyne et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Aben et al., 2012 source

      In “Simple Span Versus Complex Span” (page unavailable), the paper describes simple span tasks as primarily involving maintenance and lists n-back among working-memory tasks involving maintenance and manipulation. It also says span tasks are not process-pure: complex spans add processing demands, so the claim that span performance generally reflects storage or maintenance is too broad. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Burgoyne et al., 2025 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The cognitive operations and neural correlates of both span and updating paradigms are relatively well characterized.

    “This design reduced conceptual heterogeneity and strengthened interpretability because the cognitive operations and neural correlates of both paradigms are relatively well characterized (Aben et al., 2012; Burgoyne et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Aben et al., 2012 source

      The Simple Span Versus Complex Span section describes what span and n-back tasks require, and Neurobiological Findings discusses brain activity during memory tasks, including n-back. But the paper cautions that these tasks are not process-pure, that their underlying constructs are not well established, and that imaging findings are difficult to interpret. It therefore does not fully support the claim that the operations and neural correlates of both paradigms are relatively well characterized. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Burgoyne et al., 2025 source

      The Discussion and Conclusion distinguish the cognitive demands of complex span and updating tasks, particularly maintenance versus disengagement. The paper mentions n-back’s use in fMRI research, but the passages do not characterize the neural correlates of both paradigms. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Compared with nondominant-limb training, dominant-limb training results in more bilateral motor activation and stronger transfer, and a related pattern has been reported for discrete-to-rhythmic movement transfer.

    “For example, compared with nondominant-limb training, dominant-limb training results in more bilateral motor activation and stronger transfer (Teixeira, 2000), and a related pattern has been reported for discrete-to-rhythmic movement transfer (Ikegami et al., 2010; Schaal et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Teixeira, 2000 source
    • cites Ikegami et al., 2010 source
    • cites Schaal et al., 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Transfer has been observed from high-precision visual perception training to relatively low-precision WM tasks, but not in the reverse direction.

    “Consistent with this interpretation, transfer has been observed from high-precision visual perception training to relatively low-precision WM tasks (Jia et al., 2021), but not in the reverse direction (Cai et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jia et al., 2021 source
    • cites Cai et al., 2022 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The training-dose categories were defined empirically from the distribution of training hours rather than from trajectory-based markers of learning, so the pattern should not be taken as direct evidence regarding fast versus slow learning phases in WM training.

    “However, this pattern should not be taken as direct evidence regarding fast versus slow learning phases in WM training (Ericson & Klingberg, 2023; Yamashita et al., 2015), because our training-dose categories were defined empirically from the distribution of training hours rather than from trajectory-based markers of learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ericson & Klingberg, 2023 source
    • cites Yamashita et al., 2015 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Core executive functions are separable but partially overlapping, and demanding cognitive tasks can recruit overlapping domain-general control systems.

    “This rationale is consistent with evidence that core executive functions are separable but partially overlapping (Friedman & Miyake, 2017; Miyake et al., 2000) and that demanding cognitive tasks can recruit overlapping domain-general control systems (Duncan, 2010; Fedorenko et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Friedman & Miyake, 2017 source
    • cites Miyake et al., 2000 source
    • cites Duncan, 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Visual novelty can facilitate within-paradigm transfer, but paradigm-specific benefits associated with visual novelty may not support or even hinder cross-paradigm generalization.

    “Notably, this pattern differs from evidence that visual novelty can facilitate within-paradigm transfer (Gathercole et al., 2019; Norris et al., 2019), perhaps because the paradigm-specific benefits associated with visual novelty may not support or even hinder cross-paradigm generalization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gathercole et al., 2019 source

      The General discussion (page unavailable) reports transfer when trained and untrained tasks share a paradigm, including visuo-spatial serial recall. It does not identify visual novelty as the factor facilitating that transfer. The suggestion about cross-paradigm generalization is framed as the citing authors’ own explanation, rather than a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Norris et al., 2019 source

      The Results (Transfer data; page unavailable) show transfer from color-change training to an untrained line-orientation task using the same paradigm. The Discussion describes the change-detection demands as unfamiliar and proposes a new cognitive routine as one possible explanation, but it does not establish that visual novelty caused the transfer. The cross-paradigm explanation follows the citations as the citing authors’ own speculation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The transfer advantage does not simply scale with the amount of training, which is consistent with previous meta-analytic evidence showing no reliable dose-transfer relationship.

    “This suggests that the transfer advantage does not simply scale with the amount of training, which is consistent with previous meta-analytic evidence showing no reliable dose-transfer relationship (Au et al., 2015; Soveri et al., 2017a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Au et al., 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Soveri et al., 2017a source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Computational work highlights the importance of feature-invariant representations for transfer.

    “This interpretation is broadly consistent with computational work highlighting the importance of feature-invariant representations for transfer (Johnston & Fusi, 2023; Yosinski et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Johnston & Fusi, 2023 source
    • cites Yosinski et al., 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    One possible explanation is that updating ability matures later than span ability does, leaving greater room for updating-based training to benefit young individuals.

    “One possible explanation is that updating ability matures later than span ability does, leaving greater room for updating-based training to benefit young individuals (Ahmed et al., 2022; Skalaban et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ahmed et al., 2022 source

      The Method section describes backward digit span as requiring manipulation and updating, and the Discussion reports that backward-span performance emerged at age 5, compared with age 3 for forward span. This supports a later onset for an updating-demanding task, but the paper does not establish when updating ability matures relative to span ability or test whether updating-based training benefits young people more. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Skalaban et al., 2022 source

      The Results (Development of working memory; page unavailable) show that n-back performance peaks in the late teens and early twenties, supporting continued development of working memory in young people. The paper does not compare the maturation of updating and span abilities or test whether updating-based training benefits young people. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Clinical conditions are heterogeneous, and emerging evidence suggests that transfer patterns may vary across etiologies.

    “This question is especially important given the heterogeneity of clinical conditions and emerging evidence that transfer patterns may vary across etiologies (Zhang et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2025 source

      The Introduction describes heterogeneity in intervention effects within schizophrenia, and the Discussion reports near-transfer from working-memory training but no far-transfer to other executive-function domains. The paper does not compare clinical etiologies or say that transfer patterns vary across them; its findings are limited to patients with schizophrenia. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The asymmetric transfer patterns persisted when dosage thresholds were increased to 7 h and 10 h, although statistical significance was attenuated.

    “The asymmetric transfer patterns persisted when dosage thresholds were increased to 7 h and 10 h, although the statistical significance was attenuated (see Appendix E, Table S5 (OSM)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Follow-up analyses stratifying tasks into dual versus single n-back and simple versus complex span consistently replicated the asymmetric transfer pattern, excluding subtype variation as the cause.

    “These analyses consistently replicated the asymmetric transfer pattern (see OSM Table S3), excluding the possibility that the asymmetry was caused by subtype variation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The updating-to-span transfer effect was quantitatively greater in non-adults than in adults, but this difference was not statistically significant (F(1, 154) = 2.072, p = .152).

    “This developmental divergence may stem from a quantitatively greater updating-to-span transfer effect in non-adults than in adults (F(1, 154) = 2.072, p =.152), whereas the span-to-updating transfer effect did not differ between the two populations (F(1, 41) = 1.498, p =.228).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Egger's regression test confirmed a nonsignificant intercept (t(202) = −0.087, p = .931), indicating no systematic publication bias in the effect-size estimation.

    “The funnel plot exhibited notable symmetry (Fig. 3), and Egger’s regression test confirmed a nonsignificant intercept (t(202) = −0.087, p =.931), indicating that there was no systematic publication bias in the effect-size estimation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No significant differences emerged for either transfer direction between the verbal and nonverbal stimulus groups (Fs < 0.026, ps > .873).

    “No significant differences emerged for either transfer direction between the two stimulus groups (Fs < 0.026, ps >.873), and we proposed that the asymmetry observed in the verbal training group may be attributable to its smaller standard error (verbal: SE =.060 vs. nonverbal: SE =.114).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Updating training showed broader transfer to non-WM outcomes, including intelligence-related measures, whereas span training showed little evidence of such effects.

    “Updating training showed broader transfer to non-WM outcomes, including intelligence-related measures, whereas span training showed little evidence of such effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Developmental stage modulated the transfer asymmetry: compared with adults, non-adults exhibited greater updating-to-span transfer, leading to more significant asymmetry.

    “Second, developmental stage modulated the transfer asymmetry: Compared with adults, non-adults exhibited greater updating-to-span transfer, leading to more significant asymmetry.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The transfer advantage was evident at low training doses, and increasing training duration was not associated with progressively greater transfer effects in either direction.

    “First, the transfer advantage was evident at low training doses, and increasing training duration was not associated with progressively greater transfer effects in either direction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Asymmetry-like patterns have been suggested across studies.

    “asymmetry-like patterns have been suggested across studies (Cai et al., 2022; Schwarb et al., 2016)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cai et al., 2022 source
    • cites Schwarb et al., 2016 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    n-back training has been reported to transfer to syntactic processing more than syntactic training transfers back to WM outcomes.

    “n-back training has been reported to transfer to syntactic processing more than syntactic training transfers back to WM outcomes (Roque-Gutierrez & Ibbotson, 2023)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roque-Gutierrez & Ibbotson, 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Motor-learning studies report stronger transfer from dominant- to nondominant-limb training.

    “motor-learning studies report stronger transfer from dominant- to nondominant-limb training (Teixeira, 2000)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Teixeira, 2000 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot, Egger's regression test, and fail-safe number.

    “To determine the risk of publication bias, we first generated a funnel plot by plotting individual study effect sizes (x-axis) against their standard errors (y-axis).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Sensitivity analyses excluding older adult samples yielded virtually identical results, indicating that the adult pattern was not driven by the inclusion of older participants.

    “To ensure stability, sensitivity analyses excluding older adult samples were conducted and yielded virtually identical results, indicating that the adult pattern was not driven by the inclusion of older participants (see Table S7, OSM).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    One possible explanation is that updating training, which requires continuous monitoring and replacement of WM content, involves broader or more integrative processing than span training does, and therefore supports wider transfer.

    “One possible explanation is that updating training, which requires the continuous monitoring and replacement of WM content, involves broader or more integrative processing than span training does, and therefore supports wider transfer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The asymmetry observed in the verbal training group may be attributable to its smaller standard error (verbal SE = .060 vs. nonverbal SE = .114).

    “No significant differences emerged for either transfer direction between the two stimulus groups (Fs < 0.026, ps >.873), and we proposed that the asymmetry observed in the verbal training group may be attributable to its smaller standard error (verbal: SE =.060 vs. nonverbal: SE =.114).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Two authors independently coded the studies, with an overall agreement rate of 98%.

    “the first author coded all the studies, and a second author independently coded them again. Intercoder reliability was exceptionally high, with an overall agreement rate of 98%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Auditory temporal discrimination training can transfer to visual tasks with lower precision demands, whereas the reverse pattern is not observed, presumably because the trained representations are insufficiently fine grained.

    “Consistent with this view, auditory temporal discrimination training can transfer to visual tasks with lower precision demands, whereas the reverse pattern is not observed, presumably because the trained representations are insufficiently fine grained (Bratzke et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bratzke et al., 2012 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The literature search was systematic, covering English and Chinese databases up to September 30, 2024.

    “We conducted a systematic search across both English- and Chinese-language databases.”
    • Also stated in: § Literature search and inclusion criteria · plain
      “The search covered all relevant studies published up to September 30, 2024.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    A related possibility is that more demanding training establishes more precise and stable representations, which in turn support transfer.

    “A related possibility is that more demanding training establishes more precise and stable representations, which in turn support transfer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Taken together, the design features support the conclusion that the observed asymmetry is theoretically meaningful: WM transfer appears to be shaped not only by task similarity but also by the relative level and organization of cognitive demand.

    “Taken together, these design features support the conclusion that the observed asymmetry is theoretically meaningful: WM transfer appears to be shaped not only by task similarity but also by the relative level and organization of cognitive demand.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was preregistered: an a priori analysis plan was uploaded to OSF before initial analyses.

    “Before conducting the initial analyses, we uploaded an a priori analysis-plan document to the Open Science Framework (OSF).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    WM transfer appears to be shaped not only by whether two tasks overlap, but also by how their cognitive demands are structured relative to one another.

    “In other words, WM transfer appears to be shaped not only by whether two tasks overlap, but also by how their cognitive demands are structured relative to one another.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The asymmetry extended to broader non-WM outcomes, suggesting that the transfer advantage of higher-demand training may generalize beyond paradigm-specific WM effects.

    “Importantly, this asymmetry also extended to broader non-WM outcomes, suggesting that the transfer advantage of higher-demand training may generalize beyond paradigm-specific WM effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Asymmetric transfer may reflect a broader property of learning rather than a WM-specific phenomenon.

    “Similar directional asymmetries have been reported in motor learning (Ikegami et al., 2010; Teixeira, 2000), raising the possibility that asymmetric transfer reflects a broader property of learning rather than a WM-specific phenomenon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The findings support the hypothesis that cognitive/neural plasticity during developmental stages amplifies both the magnitude and the asymmetry of transfer effects.

    “These findings support the hypothesis that cognitive/neural plasticity during developmental stages amplifies both the magnitude and the asymmetry of transfer effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The asymmetry was most evident under lower training dosages, in non-adult samples, and in studies using verbal materials, indicating important boundary conditions for the proposed account.

    “In addition, this asymmetry was most evident under lower training dosages, in non-adult samples, and in studies using verbal materials, indicating important boundary conditions for the proposed account.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cross-task generalization in frontoparietal systems is enhanced when tasks require active manipulation rather than simple maintenance, indicating that manipulations promote more abstract representations.

    “Support for this possibility comes from evidence that cross-task generalization in frontoparietal systems is enhanced when tasks require active manipulation rather than simple maintenance, indicating that manipulations promote more abstract representations (Shi et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shi et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Differences in how sensory pathways project to shared neural systems may contribute to such asymmetries and thus provide a complementary mechanism to the resource-based account proposed here.

    “Differences in how sensory pathways project to shared neural systems may contribute to such asymmetries and thus provide a complementary mechanism to the resource-based account proposed here.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Differences in cognitive demand across domains are difficult to quantify using conventional behavioral measures, limiting direct tests of the resource-based account.

    “In addition, differences in cognitive demand across domains (e.g., working memory vs. inhibition; Liu et al., 2023) are difficult to quantify using conventional behavioral measures, limiting direct tests of the resource-based account.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liu et al., 2023 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Several methodological limitations of the present meta-analysis warrant consideration, including the greater number of studies examining updating-to-span than span-to-updating transfer, the relatively small number of studies in some moderator analyses, and the possibility that certain updating tasks were insufficiently sensitive to detect transfer from span training.

    “First, several methodological limitations of the present meta-analysis warrant consideration, including the greater number of studies examining updating-to-span than span-to-updating transfer, the relatively small number of studies in some moderator analyses, and the possibility that certain updating tasks were insufficiently sensitive to detect transfer from span training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The supplementary analysis using an alternative storage-to-manipulation versus manipulation-to-storage framework revealed a similar trend but lacked enough statistical power to detect the transfer asymmetry.

    “Because only a small number of studies could be recoded using an alternative storage-to-manipulation versus manipulation-to-storage framework, our supplementary analysis revealed a similar trend but lacked enough statistical power to detect the transfer asymmetry (see Table S9, OSM).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    By showing that transfer depends not only on task similarity but also on relative cognitive demand, the findings extend traditional accounts of WM training transfer and support a resource-based perspective, according to which training on more demanding tasks transfers more effectively to less demanding tasks.

    “By showing that transfer depends not only on task similarity but also on relative cognitive demand, these findings extend traditional accounts of WM training transfer and support a resource-based perspective, according to which training on more demanding tasks transfers more effectively to less demanding tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The present meta-analysis provides the first systematic evidence for asymmetric transfer in WM training: updating-to-span transfer yields reliable gains, whereas span-to-updating transfer remains negligible.

    “In conclusion, the present meta-analysis provides the first systematic evidence for asymmetric transfer in WM training: updating-to-span transfer yields reliable gains, whereas span-to-updating transfer remains negligible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    One possible explanation is that verbal processing may facilitate more abstract or relational representations, whereas nonverbal materials may more often elicit concrete and feature-specific coding.

    “One possible explanation is that verbal processing may facilitate more abstract or relational representations, whereas nonverbal materials may more often elicit concrete and feature-specific coding (Alfred & Kraemer, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alfred & Kraemer, 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The possible mechanisms are not mutually exclusive: broader neural recruitment, more precise representations, or more abstract representations may jointly contribute to asymmetric transfer.

    “Importantly, these possible mechanisms are not mutually exclusive: broader neural recruitment, more precise representations, or more abstract representations may jointly contribute to asymmetric transfer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The asymmetry is especially pronounced under lower training doses, in younger samples, and with verbal materials, indicating important boundary conditions for transfer.

    “Moreover, the asymmetry is especially pronounced under lower training doses, in younger samples, and with verbal materials, indicating important boundary conditions for transfer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    In the present dataset, some verbal materials also involved richer semantic processing (e.g., sentences), which may further support abstraction.

    “In the present dataset, some verbal materials also involved richer semantic processing (e.g., sentences), which may further support abstraction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Increasing manipulation complexity, such as in executive n-back tasks, leads to broader transfer outcomes.

    “This finding is also consistent with training findings showing that increasing manipulation complexity, such as in executive n-back tasks, leads to broader transfer outcomes (Cao et al., 2026).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cao et al., 2026 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The converging patterns raise the possibility that asymmetric transfer reflects a broader tendency for training that recruits more extensive or integrative processing to transfer more readily than training that recruits less extensive or integrative processing.

    “These converging patterns raise the possibility that asymmetric transfer reflects a broader tendency for training that recruits more extensive or integrative processing to transfer more readily than training that recruits less extensive or integrative processing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    Because the present meta-analysis focused on healthy populations, it remains unclear whether the observed asymmetry can be generalized to clinical groups.

    “Second, because the present meta-analysis focused on healthy populations, it remains unclear whether the observed asymmetry can be generalized to clinical groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    A third possibility is that the observed asymmetry reflects differences along a storage-manipulation continuum such that training requiring active manipulation promotes broader transfer than training focused primarily on maintenance does.

    “A third possibility, motivated by recent WM evidence, is that the observed asymmetry reflects differences along a storage–manipulation continuum such that training requiring active manipulation promotes broader transfer than training focused primarily on maintenance does, resulting in the transfer asymmetry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Overall, the moderator findings suggest that the transfer advantage is not only systematic but also context dependent.

    “Overall, these moderator findings suggest that the transfer advantage is not only systematic but also context dependent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Longer training may induce fatigue and reduce motivation, potentially offsetting any benefits of additional practice.

    “Au et al. further proposed that longer training may induce fatigue and reduce motivation, potentially offsetting any benefits of additional practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Au et al., 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Roque-Gutierrez and Ibbotson (2023) reported an ability-based transfer advantage in the WM-linguistic domain, indicating that transfer asymmetry in higher-order cognitive training requires more study.

    “Roque-Gutierrez and Ibbotson (2023), for example, reported an ability-based transfer advantage in the WM–linguistic domain, indicating that transfer asymmetry in higher-order cognitive training requires more study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roque-Gutierrez and Ibbotson, 2023 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Children and adolescents may have greater transfer potential because their cognitive systems remain under development, and prior meta-analytic findings show stronger cross-domain transfer from WM training in younger populations.

    “This pattern is consistent with evidence that children and adolescents may have greater transfer potential because their cognitive systems remain under development (Liu et al., 2023), as well as with prior meta-analytic findings of stronger cross-domain transfer from WM training in younger populations (Sala et al., 2019b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Liu et al., 2023 source
    • cites Sala et al., 2019b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

60 of 60
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Maintenance is a cross-task general core component required by both span and updating paradigms, whereas updating is a more task-constrained configuration that includes maintenance plus specialized operations.

    “Within our ability-based operationalization, maintenance is treated as a cross-task general core component required by both paradigms, whereas updating is treated as a more task-constrained configuration that necessarily includes maintenance but additionally recruits specialized operations”
1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 0reported p = 1 · recomputed p = 1.000

    “χ2(1) = 0.000, p = 1.000”

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 23.699reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “χ2(1) = 23.699, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 202) = 3.259reported p = .073 · recomputed p = .073

    “F(1, 202) = 3.259, p = .073”

  • ConsistentF(1, 298) = 3.174reported p = .076 · recomputed p = .076

    “F(1, 298) = 3.174, p = .076”

  • ConsistentF(1, 57) = 4.551reported p = .037 · recomputed p = .037

    “F(1, 57) = 4.551, p = .037”

  • ConsistentF(1, 143) = 0.49reported p = .485 · recomputed p = .485

    “F(1, 143) = 0.490, p = .485”

  • ConsistentF(1, 45) = 18.19reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1, 45) = 18.19, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 150) = 0.695reported p = .406 · recomputed p = .406

    “F(1, 150) = 0.695, p = .406”

  • ConsistentF(1, 154) = 2.072reported p = .152 · recomputed p = .152

    “F(1, 154) = 2.072, p = .152”

  • ConsistentF(1, 41) = 1.498reported p = .228 · recomputed p = .228

    “F(1, 41) = 1.498, p = .228”

  • ConsistentF(1, 40) = 3.346reported p = .075 · recomputed p = .075

    “F(1, 40) = 3.346, p = .075”

  • Consistentt(202) = -0.087reported p = .931 · recomputed p = .931

    “t(202) = −0.087, p = .931”

12 of 12

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Within-WM directional difference is called significant despite p = .073

    Major

    The discussion says updating-to-span effects were significantly greater, but the reported test of that directional difference has p = .073 and is described in the results as marginal.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

16 of the 133 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Authors
Fu, J., Zhou, Y., Yuan, M., & Cai, Y.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Anhui Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Cai, Ying
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2026-09-08
Volume
33
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W6906261565
Cited by
0
References
133
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Open Science Framework
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32100851)
  • the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (226-2024-00118)
  • the National Science and Technology Innovation 2030-Major Projects (2021ZD0200401, 2021ZD0200409)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory training, transfer of training, task similarity, cognitive demand, working memory updating, working memory span, training dose, verbal stimuli, training program design
MeSH terms
Cognitive Training, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Transfer, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review