The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of the True Intraocular Pressure and Modulus of Elasticity of the Human Cornea in vivo
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gordon, M. O. (2002) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.714 · Cited by 2,626
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern®
Gedde, S. J., Vinod, K., Wright, M. M., Muir, K. W., Lind, J. T., Chen, P. P., Li, T., & Mansberger, S. L. (2021) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022 · Cited by 474
The materials science of collagen
Sherman, V. R., Yang, W., & Meyers, M. A. (2015) · Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.023 · Cited by 324
Ocular Rigidity in Living Human Eyes
Pallikaris, I. G., Kymionis, G. D., Ginis, H. S., Kounis, G. A., & Tsilimbaris, M. K. (2005) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0162 · Cited by 301
Full-field deformation of bovine cornea under constrained inflation conditions
Boyce, B. L., Grazier, J. M., Jones, R. E., & Nguyen, T. D. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.011 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Orssengo, G.
- Venue
- Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 551-572
- ISSN
- 0092-8240 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040781611
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of the True Intraocular Pressure and Modulus of Elasticity of the Human Cornea in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/bulm.1999.0102
- The paper
- Orssengo, G. (1999). Determination of the True Intraocular Pressure and Modulus of Elasticity of the Human Cornea in vivo. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
