Students' Goals, Self-Efficacy, Self-Handicapping, and Negative Affective Responses: An Australian Senior School Student Study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced autonomous motivation has been argued to relate to negative affect, to diminish effects of positive feedback on subsequent behavior, and to generate classroom disaffection and lower levels of achievement.
“Furthermore, reduced autonomous motivation has been argued to relate to negative affect (Smith, Sinclair, & Chapman, 2002), to diminish effects of positive feedback on subsequent behavior (Boggiano & Barrett, 1985), and to generate classroom disaffection and lower levels of achievement (Eccles, 1998).”
From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Smith, Sinclair, & Chapman, 2002
Cites
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468 · see citing works
Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176 · Cited by 4,874 · see citing works
Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings
Pajares, F. (1996) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170653 · Cited by 4,688 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation.
Pulfrey, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023911 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Academic stress in the final years of school: a systematic literature review
Wuthrich, V. M., Jagiello, T., & Azzi, V. (2020) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-020-00981-y · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Interaction between task values and self-efficacy on maladaptive achievement strategy use
Lee, J., Bong, M., & Kim, S.-I. (2014) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.895296 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Martínez-Pérez, I., García-Rodríguez, A., Morales-Rodríguez, F. M., & Pérez-Mármol, J. M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15064729 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, L., Sinclair, K. E., & Chapman, E. S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- ORCID
- Smith, Lorraine
- Venue
- Contemporary Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 471-485
- ISSN
- 0361-476X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092534485
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Keywords
- goal theory, academic self-efficacy, self-handicapping, negative affect, performance-avoidance goals, performance-approach goals, academic motivation, achievement behavior, gender differences, high school students, longitudinal change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review