Cited by 16Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEmotional Intelligence and Performance

Mindfulness Abilities Are Associated with Anxiety Levels, Emotional Intelligence, and Perceived Self-Efficacy

Open access
Martínez-Pérez, Inés, García-Rodríguez, Almudena, Morales-Rodríguez, Francisco Manuel, Pérez-Mármol, José Manuel·2023·Sustainability

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between anxiety, emotional intelligence, perceived self-efficacy, and mindfulness abilities. A total of 205 Spanish university students were assessed for mindfulness (Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory-14), state-trait anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), emotional intelligence (Trait Meta-Mood Scale-24), and general perceived self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale). The Student’s t-test was used to evaluate the possible differences between sexes for the study variables. Multiple regression analyses were conducted for each sex independently to evaluate the relationship between mindfulness and the other psychological variables, using mindfulness dimensions as a dependent variable. The results showed significant differences between females and males in mindfulness dimensions of self-control (p < 0.001) and acceptance (p = 0.012), and state (p = 0.005) and trait anxiety (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that the models for the relationship between mindfulness dimensions (attention, self-control, acceptance, and self-perception) and the other variables differed between females and males. Our results suggest that anxiety, emotional intelligence, and general perceived self-efficacy may be related to mindfulness abilities among a sample of Spanish university students. These findings could inform the development of targeted intervention programs to improve these psycho-emotional abilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su15064729

Cites

49 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 4 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness and anxiety are linked to self-efficacy.

    “Both of these factors have been linked to self-efficacy [97, 98]”

    From Personalized machine learning guided intervention for optimizing lifestyle behaviors in depression: a pilot study (2026) · cites this paper as [98]

    Section 4.4 reports that university students with higher mindfulness had higher general self-efficacy. The passages retrieved for anxiety, including Section 3.3, discuss anxiety and self-efficacy in relation to mindfulness but do not establish a direct link between anxiety and self-efficacy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Miller, W.R., Ed.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; pp. 67-84.
  2. Alvarado-García, P.A.A.; Soto-Vásquez, M.R.; Rosales-Cerquin, L. Atención plena y bienestar psicológico: Un estudio controlado y aleatorizado [Mindfulness and psychological wellbeing: A randomized controlled study]. Med. Natur. 2019, 13, 22-26.
  3. Bisquerra, R.; Pérez-Escoda, N. Las competencias emocionales [Emotional competencies]. Educ. XXI 2007, 10, 61-82.
  4. Cañero, M.; Mónaco, E.; Montoya, I. La inteligencia emocional y la empatía como factores predictores del bienestar subjetivo en estudiantes universitarios [Emotional intelligence and empathy as predictors of subjective well-being in university students]. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2019, 9, 19-29.
  5. Atienza, F.M. Autoestima, Inteligencia Emocional, Motivación y Bienestar Psicológico de los Estudiantes de la Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria [Self-Esteem, Emotional Intelligence, Motivation and Psychological Well-Being of the Students of The University]. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain, 2016.
  6. Navarro Saldaña, G.; Flores Oyarzo, G.; González Navarro, M.-G. Diferencias por sexo en el nivel de Autoeficacia percibida en una muestra de estudiantes de la Provincia de Concepción ¿Qué papel juegan los roles de género en la educación? [Differences by sex in the level of perceived self-efficacy in a sample of students from the Province of Concepción. What role do gender roles play in education?]. Rev. Educ. Incl. 2019, 12, 205-224.
  7. Alejandra, P.; Zegarra, R. Autoestima y Ansiedad Estado-Rasgo en Jóvenes Universitarios de la Ciudad de Lima [Self-Esteem and State-Trait Anxiety in University Students from the City of Lima]. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lima, Santiago de Surco, Peru, 2019.
  8. Karpiuk, I.N.; Opazo, R.; Gomez, A.I. Autoeficacia academica, burnout academico y desgranamiento universitario [Academic self-efficacy, academic burnout and universitary shelling]. Rev. Psicol. 2015, 11, 45-57.
  9. Tsholofeo, A. The Relationship between Ethbicidenty, Collective Self-Esteem and Academic Self-Efficay among Students at a Higher Learning Institution. Master's Thesis, Departament of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2010.
  10. Extremera, N.; Fernández-Berrocal, P.; Mestre, J.M.; Del Rocío, M.; Bozal, G. Medidas de Evaluación de la Inteligencia Emocional [Evaluation Measures of Emotional Intelligence]. Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 2004, 36, 209-228. Available online: https://www. researchgate.net/publication/230887071. (accessed on 2 July 2020).
  11. Baessler, J.; Schwarzer, R. Evaluación de la autoeficacia; Adaptación española de la escala de autoeficacia general [assessing self-efficacy: Spanish adaption of the general self-efficacy scale]. Ansiedad Estrés 1996, 2, 1-8.
  12. Sanjuán Suárez, P.; Pérez García, A.M.; Bermúdez Moreno, J. Escala de autoeficacia general: Datos psicométricos de la adaptación para población española [The general self-efficacy scale: Psychometric data from the Spanish adaptation]. Psicothema 2000, 12, 509-513.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martínez-Pérez, I., García-Rodríguez, A., Morales-Rodríguez, F. M., & Pérez-Mármol, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • Department of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
  • Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-03-07
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
4729
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323569324
Cited by
16
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Keywords
mindfulness, anxiety, emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, state-trait anxiety, gender differences, university students, self-control, acceptance, attention, self-perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review