The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food for Thought: Cross-Classification and Category Organization in a Complex Real-World Domain
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory
(2010) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-62209-1 · Cited by 5,994
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 · Cited by 5,248
Conceptual Change in Childhood
Carey, S. E. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,850
(2010) · Mind, Language and Reality · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625251.014 · Cited by 3,767
Context theory of classification learning
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 · Cited by 3,061
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674866270 · Cited by 2,606
Similarity and Analogical Reasoning
(1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529863 · Cited by 2,381
The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research
Clark, H. H. (1973) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80014-3 · Cited by 2,222
Cited by
Situated simulation in the human conceptual system
Barsalou, L. (2003) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960344000026 · Cited by 979
Causal Models: How People Think about the World and Its Alternatives
Sloman, S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183115.001.0001 · Cited by 677
Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility
Ionescu, T. (2012) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.001 · Cited by 578
Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward
Simmons, W. K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. W. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi038 · Cited by 569
On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends
Barsalou, L. W. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, B. H., & Murphy, G. L.
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 495-553
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968153682
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 21.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food for Thought: Cross-Classification and Category Organization in a Complex Real-World Domain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/cogp.1998.0712
- The paper
- Ross, B. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1999). Food for Thought: Cross-Classification and Category Organization in a Complex Real-World Domain. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
