The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regulation of Transcriptional Activity during the First and Second Cell Cycles in the Preimplantation Mouse Embryo
Open accessAbstract
Transcription of endogenous genes in preimplantation 1- and 2-cell mouse embryos was determined by monitoring the incorporation of BrUTP by plasma membrane-permeabilized embryos. Incorporation is observed starting by mid-S phase in the 1-cell embryo and increases progressively; the amount of incorporation by the 1-cell embryo in G2 is about 20% that of the 2-cell embryo in G2. Incorporation by the male pronucleus is always about four to five times greater than that of the female pronucleus. Nevertheless, the amount of incorporation by the female pronucleus present in parthogenetically activated eggs is similar to the total amount of incorporation in inseminated eggs, i.e., the transcriptional capacity of the female pronucleus is not inherently less than that of the male pronucleus. Inhibiting the first round of DNA replication does not prevent the initiation of transcription in the 1-cell embryo, but does inhibit the extent of BrUTP incorporation by 35%. The transcriptional machinery of the 1-cell embryo appears to be rate-limiting, since the total amount of BrUTP incorporation by parthenogenetically activated and dispermic eggs is similar to that in monospermic eggs; trispermic eggs incorporate BrUTP to only about 60% the level of monospermic eggs. A transcriptionally repressive state may start to develop in the 2-cell embryo, since inhibiting the second round of DNA replication results in an 50% increase in BrUTP incorporation. Trapoxin treatment, which induces histone hyperacetylation, enhances incorporation by 2-cell embryos 1.8-fold and suggests that histone hyperacetylation can relieve this repression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
TETonic shift: biological roles of TET proteins in DNA demethylation and transcription
Pastor, W. A., Aravind, L., & Rao, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3589 · Cited by 897
The maternal-to-zygotic transition revisited
Vastenhouw, N. L., Cao, W. X., & Lipshitz, H. D. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.161471 · Cited by 445
Dynamics of the epigenetic landscape during the maternal-to-zygotic transition
Eckersley-Maslin, M. A., Alda-Catalinas, C., & Reik, W. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0008-z · Cited by 431
Ramalho-Santos, J., Amaral, S., & Oliveira, P. (2008) · Current Diabetes Reviews · doi:10.2174/157339908783502398 · Cited by 359
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development
Lepikhov, K., Arand, J., Wossidlo, M., & Walter, J. (2012) · Encyclopedia of Molecular Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/3527600906.mcb.201100038 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Aoki, F., Worrad, D. M., & Schultz, R. M.
- Venue
- Developmental Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 181
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 296-307
- ISSN
- 0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010868220
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulation of Transcriptional Activity during the First and Second Cell Cycles in the Preimplantation Mouse Embryo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/dbio.1996.8466
- The paper
- Aoki, F., Worrad, D. M., & Schultz, R. M. (1997). Regulation of Transcriptional Activity during the First and Second Cell Cycles in the Preimplantation Mouse Embryo. Developmental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1996.8466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.