Toxicity of sediments and sediment pore waters from the Grand Calumet River–Indiana Harbor, Indiana area of concern.
Abstract
The assessment of contaminated sediments is a difficult task due to the complex nature of the sediment matrix and the potential for exposure of aquatic organisms to in-place contaminants via several routes. Differential species sensitivity also precludes the completion of a meaningful environmental assessment with only one species. Therefore, a battery of assays approach with the Microtox assay, 48 hr Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia tests and a 10-day Chironomous tentans test was used to evaluate the toxicity of sediment pore waters and whole sediments from the Grand Calumet River-Indiana Harbor, Indiana area of concern. All toxicity tests indicated that the test fractions (pore water, whole sediment) from each study site were toxic to the test species. A toxic units (TU) approach was used to compare measured TU from each assay with calculated TU based on chemical analyses of pore waters and whole sediments and the results of reference toxicant tests. Based on the results of these analyses, ammonia, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, and bicarbonate ion appear to be the major contaminants of environmental significance to benthic invertebrates within the study area.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mount, D. R., Gulley, D. D., Hockett, J. R., Garrison, T. D., & Evans, J. M. (1997) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5620161005 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Harper, A. R., Santin, C., Doerr, S. H., Froyd, C. A., Albini, D., Otero, X. L., Viñas, L., & Pérez-Fernández, B. (2019) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf18200 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hoke, R. A., Giesy, J. P., Zabik, M., & Unger, M.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-112
- ISSN
- 0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061120696
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Keywords
- sediment toxicity, sediment pore water, sediment contamination, Grand Calumet River, Areas of Concern, Microtox test, Daphnia magna, Ceriodaphnia dubia, Chironomus tentans, toxic units, ammonia, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, bicarbonate, benthic invertebrates, species sensitivity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chironomidae, Daphnia, Fresh Water, Indiana, Lethal Dose 50, Photobacterium, Species Specificity, Water Pollutants, Chemical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review