Chemical composition of wildfire ash produced in contrasting ecosystems and its toxicity to Daphnia magna
Open accessAbstract
It is well established in the world’s fire-prone regions that wildfires can considerably change the hydrological dynamics of freshwater catchments. Limited research, however, has focused on the potential impacts of wildfire ash toxicity on aquatic biota. Here, we assess the chemical composition and toxicity of ash generated from wildfires in six contrasting vegetation types distributed globally (UK grassland, Spanish pine forest, Spanish heathland, USA chaparral, Australian eucalypt forest and Canadian spruce forest). Acute (48 h) immobilisation tests were conducted on the extensively studied aquatic macroinvertebrate Daphnia magna, a sensitive indicator of aquatic contaminants. We found significant differences between the chemical composition and toxicity of these ash types. The UK and Spanish ash had no detectable toxicity to Daphnia magna, whereas the Australian eucalypt, USA chaparral and Canadian spruce ash all caused significant toxicity (immobilisation). The principal characteristics of the latter ash types were their high pH, and NO3−, Cl− and conductivity levels. Elevated water-soluble and total concentrations of metals (e.g. Mn, Fe, Zn, Pb, Cu and As) and total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were not linked to toxicity.
Verified 2026-10-06 · 3 references not checked yet
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Wildfire ash from six contrasting ecosystems varied widely in chemistry; ash from Australian eucalypt, USA chaparral and Canadian spruce caused acute immobilisation of *Daphnia magna*, while UK grassland and Spanish pine/heathland ash did not. Toxicity was associated with high pH, conductivity, NO₃⁻ and Cl⁻, not with elevated metals or total PAHs.
Key findings
- Acute 48-h *D. magna* immobilisation was significant for Australian eucalypt (AUS), USA chaparral (USA) and Canadian spruce (CAN) ash (P < 0.001 for all three), but not for Spanish heathland (URIA), Spanish pine (SPA) or UK grassland (UK) ash. AUS was most toxic, with 100% immobilisation at <25 g ash L⁻¹ within 24 h; 48-h EC₅₀ values were 9.5 g L⁻¹ (AUS), 20 g L⁻¹ (USA) and 26 g L⁻¹ (CAN).
- Leachate pH ranged from 7.9 (UK) to 11.2 (USA), and electrical conductivity from 233 mS cm⁻¹ (SPA) to 3880 mS cm⁻¹ (AUS). PCA explained 79% of leachate variance (PC1 = 41%, PC2 = 23%, PC3 = 15%); the three toxic ash types were most closely correlated with high pH, EC, NO₃⁻, Cl⁻, Hg and SO₄²⁻.
- Total Ca was the most abundant element (11,800–177,000 mg kg⁻¹); total As, Cd and Hg were lowest (0.46–9.67, 0.17–1.13 and 0–0.05 mg kg⁻¹ respectively). Water-soluble SO₄²⁻, Cl⁻ and Na were most abundant (1203–10,180, 228–1509 and 17–3893 mg kg⁻¹ respectively).
- Σ16 EPA PAHs ranged from 1155 to 14,078 ng g⁻¹ ash, with the highest concentration in UK ash (14,078 ng g⁻¹). Elevated water-soluble and total metals (e.g. Mn, Fe, Zn, Pb, Cu, As) and total PAHs were not linked to toxicity; higher PAH concentrations were associated with reduced toxicity.
Methods
- Six composite ash samples were collected after wildfires from UK grassland, Spanish pine forest, Spanish heathland, USA chaparral, Australian eucalypt forest and Canadian spruce forest; each was sieved through 1 mm before characterisation or bioassay.
- Chemical characterisation measured total and water-soluble major and trace elements, pH, DOC and electrical conductivity, plus 35 PAHs by GC/MS; principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to water-soluble leachate data.
- Acute 48-h immobilisation tests used *Daphnia magna* following OECD 202 except that pH was not adjusted to control levels; six ash concentrations (3.12, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 75 g L⁻¹) plus controls were tested, with 150 daphnids per ash type. ANOVA with post-hoc Dunnett’s tests identified LOEC, EC₁₀ and EC₅₀ values.
Limitations
- The paper states it is difficult to isolate primary causes of toxicity in complex, variable wildfire ash; possible indirect influences include pH, EC, Ca, DOC, Na and Mg, and physical particle size/distribution in unfiltered samples may have impaired feeding or locomotion.
- The paper states PAHs were measured only in bulk ash, not the leachable fraction; synergistic, antagonistic or additive effects could not be ruled out, and longer-term sublethal PAH impacts were beyond the study scope. pH was not adjusted in the bioassays, though the authors justify this as closer to natural conditions and within OECD 202 guidance.
- Evident from the text: toxicity was assessed with only one species (*D. magna*) and one acute endpoint (48-h immobilisation), with no chronic, field or community-level validation; ash samples were composites from single fire/ecosystem sources, limiting replication and generality.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 112 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
UK and Spanish ash had no detectable toxicity to Daphnia magna.
“The UK and Spanish ash had no detectable toxicity to Daphnia magna, whereas the Australian eucalypt, USA chaparral and Canadian spruce ash all caused significant toxicity (immobilisation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Elevated water-soluble and total concentrations of metals (Mn, Fe, Zn, Pb, Cu and As) and total PAHs were not linked to toxicity.
“Elevated water-soluble and total concentrations of metals (e.g.Mn, Fe, Zn, Pb, Cu and As) and total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were not linked to toxicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The principal characteristics of the toxic ash types were high pH and high NO3−, Cl− and conductivity levels.
“The principal characteristics of the latter ash types were their high pH, and NO 3 À , Cl À and conductivity levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The total elemental composition of the six ash types overall contained several potential contaminants, but in highly variable concentrations.
“The total elemental composition of the six ash types overall contained several potential contaminants, but in highly variable concentrations (Supplementary material Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ca was the most abundant element in all ash samples, with a range of 11 800-177 000 mg kg−1.
“The most abundant element in all samples was Ca (range 11 800-177 000 mg kg À1 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The UK ash leachate has a distinctly soluble profile in comparison with the other ash types.
“The UK ash leachate has a distinctly soluble profile in comparison with the others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The predominant two-ring PAH in all samples was naphthalene.
“The predominant two-ring PAH in all samples was naphthalene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The AUS ash was the most toxic, with 100% immobilisation of D. magna at less than 25 g ash L−1 within the first 24 h of exposure.
“The response relationships identify the AUS ash as the most toxic, with a 100% immobilisation of D. magna individuals at less than 25 g ash L À1 within the first 24 h of exposure (Table 5; Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
EC levels varied greatly from 233 mS cm−1 in the SPA ash to 3880 mS cm−1 in the AUS ash.
“Equally, EC levels varied greatly from 233 mS cm À1 in the SPA ash to 3880 mS cm À1 in the AUS ash.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
As, Cd and Hg were found in the lowest total concentrations among the elements measured.
“The elements found in the lowest total concentrations were: As (range 0.46-9.67mg kg À1 ), Cd (range 0.17-1.13mg kg À1 ) and Hg (range 0-0.05 mg kg À1 ) (supplementary material Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Notably high PAH concentrations were also found in the CAN (7486 ng g−1) and SPA (4393 ng g−1) ash.
“Notably high PAHs concentrations were also found in the CAN ( P 16 EPA PAHs: 7486 ng g À1 ) and the SPA ash ( P 16 EPA PAHs: 4393 ng g À1 ash) (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For the AUS ash sample, the levels of soluble B and Na are higher than in the other ash types.
“For the AUS ash sample, the levels of soluble B and Na are higher than in the other ash types (Fig. 1, Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Unlike Silva et al. (2015), where the principal potential toxic components of their eucalypt ash were Mn and Zn, neither Mn nor Zn were found in the eucalypt (AUS) ash analysed here.
“Unlike reported by Silva et al. (2015), where the principal potential toxic components of their eucalypt ash were Mn and Zn, neither of these elements were found in the eucalypt (AUS) ash analysed here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Silva et al. 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Cd, Ni, Zn and Hg were the minor metal and metalloid elements found in the lowest concentrations in the leachates.
“The minor metal and metalloids elements were similarly the components found in the lowest concentration in the leachates: Cd (range 0-7 mg kg À1 ), Ni (range 60-844 mg kg À1 ), Zn (range 0-140 mg kg À ) and Hg (range 1-2 mg kg À1 ) (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a predominance of two-ring PAHs in all the ash samples.
“There was also a predominance of two-ring PAHs in all the samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The pH (7.9) of the UK leachate was 1 to 3 units lower than the extracts from the other samples.
“The pH (7.9) of the UK leachate was 1 to 3 units lower than the extracts from the other samples (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Spanish samples (URIA and SPA) only produced low rates of immobilisation at the highest concentrations.
“The Spanish samples (URIA, SPA) only produced low rates of immobilisation at the highest concentrations (Tables 5 and 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The immobilisation effects of the USA and CAN ash samples were relatively similar, with 48-h EC50 values of 20 and 26 g ash L−1 respectively, despite their notably different source vegetation.
“The immobilisation effect of both the North American ash samples (USA and CAN) were relatively similar, with 48-h EC 50 being achieved at 20 and 26 g ash L À1 respectively, despite the notably different source vegetation (Table 6; Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PCA analysis shows several heavy metals (Mn, Fe, Zn and Pb) and PO4 to be characteristic elements of the UK ash leachate.
“PCA analysis shows several heavy metals (Mn, Fe, Zn and Pb) and PO 4 3À to be characteristic elements of the UK ash leachate (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The water-soluble concentrations of each element were relatively low compared with the total dry concentration within each ash type.
“The water-soluble concentrations of each element were relatively low when compared with the total dry concentration within each ash type (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The UK leachate shows high concentrations of soluble Fe, Mn and PO4 in comparison with the other ash types.
“This leachate shows high concentrations of soluble Fe, Mn and PO 4 3À in comparison with the other ash types (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, the water solubility of the studied elements in all ash types was low (<20% except for Na and Hg).
“Overall, the water solubility of the studied elements in all ash types was low (,20% except for Na and Hg).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The UK ash did not produce any observable immobilisation across any of the test concentrations after 48 h of exposure.
“The UK ash did not produce any observable immobilisation across any of the test concentrations after 48 h of exposure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PCA identified three primary components explaining 79% of the total leachates dataset variance (PC1 = 41%; PC2 = 23%; PC3 = 15%).
“PCA identified three primary components explaining 79% of the total leachates dataset variance (PC1 ¼ 41%; PC2 ¼ 23%; PC3 ¼ 15%) (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the URIA ash, the most defining components were Cu, Al, Ni, NH4 and As.
“In the URIA ash, the most defining components were Cu, Al, Ni, NH 4 þ and As (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PCA identified high concentrations of Cl- and NO3- as key characteristic components of the three toxic ash types, particularly the more toxic AUS and USA ash.
“However, the PCA also identified high concentrations of Cl À and NO 3 À as being key characteristic components of the three toxic ash types, particularly the more toxic AUS and USA ash (Table 3 and Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The values contained within the ash tested here are substantially higher than those presented by Olivella et al. (2006) testing wildfire ash from pine and oak forests (Σ12 PAHs: 1-19 ng g−1 ash).
“The values contained within the ash tested here are substantially higher than those presented by Olivella et al. (2006) testing wildfire ash from pine and oak forests ( P 12 PAHs: 1-19 ng g À1 ash).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Olivella et al. 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
Higher PAH concentrations seem to be associated with reduced toxicity.
“and, furthermore, higher PAHs concentrations seem to be associated with reduced toxicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The PCA identified pH and EC as two parameters strongly characteristic of the three ash types causing significant D. magna immobilisation (AUS, USA, CAN).
“The PCA identified pH and EC as two of the parameters strongly characteristic of the three ash types causing significant D. magna immobilisation (AUS, USA, CAN) (Table 3, Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The UK ash shows a much higher PAH concentration than the other ash types.
“The UK ash shows a much higher PAHs concentration than the other types (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The lowest PAH concentration, found in the AUS ash type (Σ16 EPA PAHs: 1155 ng g−1 ash), was comparable with those found by Silva et al. (2015) in a predominantly eucalypt ecosystem in Portugal (Σ16 EPA PAHs: 1100 ng g−1 ash).
“found in the AUS ash type ( P 16 EPA PAHs: 1155 ng g À1 ash), was of a comparable level with those found by Silva et al. (2015) assessing dry wildfire ash in a predominantly eucalypt ecosystem in Portugal ( P 16 EPA PAHs: 1100 ng g À1 ash).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Silva et al. 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
The more neutral pH of the UK ash sample does not seem to have reduced the leaching of Al, Cd, Cu and Pb.
“The more neutral pH of the UK sample, however, does not seem to have reduced the leaching of Al, Cd, Cu and Pb.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The darker ash samples (UK, URIA, CAN) contained a much higher concentration of PAHs than the lighter samples (AUS, USA, SPA).
“This was also true of the ash types tested here with the darker (dark grey-black) ash samples (UK, URIA, CAN) containing a much higher concentration of PAHs than the lighter (light grey-white) samples (AUS, USA, SPA) (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The concentrations of PAHs found in the ash analysed here are widely variable, with a range of 1155 ng g−1 in the AUS ash to 14 078 ng g−1 in the UK ash (16 USEPA priority PAHs).
“The concentrations of PAHs found in the ash analysed here are also widely variable, with a range of 1155 ng g À1 in the AUS ash to 14 078 ng g À1 in the UK ash (16 USEPA priority PAHs) (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Relatively high PAH concentrations found in the ash tested here appear to produce no observable toxicity on Daphnia magna.
“The relatively high PAHs concentrations found in the ash tested here appear to produce no observable toxicity on D. magna”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The total PAH concentrations were also not linked to significant inhibition.
“The total PAHs concentrations were also not linked to significant inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The main characteristics of the ash types producing immobilisation, derived from PCA, were high PC values of pH, EC, NO3-, Cl-, Hg and SO4 2-.
“The main characteristics of these ash types producing immobilisation, derived from PCA, were high PC values of pH, EC, NO 3 À , Cl À , Hg and SO 4 2À .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The solubility of all elements was low for all ash types when comparing the total and leachate characterisation data.
“The solubility of all elements was low for all ash types comparing the total and leachate characterisation data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The results demonstrate significant immobilisation of Daphnia magna over acute exposure of 48 h to three of the six ash types: AUS, USA and CAN.
“Our results demonstrate significant immobilisation of Daphnia magna over acute exposure (48 h) to three of the six ash types (AUS, USA and CAN).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
OECD 202 guidelines acknowledge that tests should be carried out without adjustment of pH where values are within pH 6-9 at the highest test concentration.
“OECD 202 guidelines acknowledge that tests should be carried out without the adjustment of pH where values are within pH 6-9 at the highest test concentration (OECD 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In those studies, toxicity was observed on Vibrio fischeri, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Lemna minor.
“Toxicity was, however, observed on several lower trophic level species in these studies, the bacteria Vibrio fischeri, algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and the macrophyte Lemna minor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Highly variable impacts of ash contamination on freshwater biota have been reported between different ecosystems, types of ash, fires and species.
“Highly variable impacts of ash contamination on freshwater biota have been reported between different ecosystems, types of ash, fires and species (Smith et al. 2011;Silva et al. 2015;Oliveira-Filho et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Study design and conductcitation
pH was not adjusted to control levels (pH 7.2 ± 0.2) in the bioassays in order to reproduce conditions as close to natural as possible.
“pH was not adjusted to control levels (pH 7.2 Æ 0.2) in the bioassays to reproduce as close to natural conditions as possible, given pH is one of the most important factors affecting the toxicity and bioavailability of elements to freshwater species (Franklin et al. 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Franklin et al. 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
pH is one of the most important factors affecting the toxicity and bioavailability of elements to freshwater species.
“given pH is one of the most important factors affecting the toxicity and bioavailability of elements to freshwater species (Franklin et al. 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Franklin et al. 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Variations in element concentrations among ash types may be explained by the accumulative capacity of different vegetation types, taking up different levels of elements from the soil and surrounding environment.
“These variations may be explained by the accumulative capacity of the different vegetation types, taking up different levels of elements from the soil and surrounding environment (Peralta-Videa et al. 2009;Brito et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
This further highlights the differences in ash composition comparing individual fire events and ecosystem types.
“This further highlights the differences in ash composition comparing individual fire events and ecosystem types (Bodı ´et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bodı ´et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Heavy metals such as Cd, Ni and Zn showed the lowest concentration in the leachates owing to being relatively insoluble in alkaline (pH 8-10) conditions, precipitating mainly as hydroxides.
“In contrast, heavy metals such as Cd, Ni and Zn showed the lowest concentration in the leachates owing to being relatively insoluble in alkaline (pH 8-10) conditions, precipitating mainly as hydroxides (Weiner 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weiner 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Less alkaline conditions favour the solubility of metals and P compared with other samples where metals tend to precipitate as hydroxides for pH values above 8-9 and phosphate as hydroxyapatite for pH values >8.5.
“These less alkaline conditions favour the solubility of metals and P compared with the other samples where the metals tend to precipitate as hydroxides for pH values above 8-9 and the phosphate as hydroxyapatite for pH values .8.5 (for example see: Diaz et al. 1994;Stumm and Morgan 1995).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Diaz et al. 1994 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stumm and Morgan 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Mount et al. estimated a concentration of 1000-2000 mg L-1 as the concentration of Cl- required to produce EC50 in Ceriodaphnia dubia.
“Similarly, Mount et al. (1997) estimated a concentration of 1000-2000 mg L À1 as the concentration of Cl À required to produce EC 50 in Ceriodaphnia dubia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mount et al. (1997) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PAHs have limited solubility in water, particularly the larger-ring-size PAHs with more than three rings.
“PAHs have limited solubility in water, particularly of the larger-ring-size PAHs (.3 rings) (Chen et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al. 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
pH may have an indirect effect on D. magna immobilisation as pH can influence the dissolution of elements from ash into water and therefore the relative toxic potential of other ash components.
“This perhaps suggests that pH has an indirect effect on D. magna immobilisation as pH can also influence the dissolution of elements from ash into water and therefore the relative toxic potential of other ash components (Fedje et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fedje et al. 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Despite the correlations between NO3- and Cl- with the toxic ash types found here, the relatively low quantities of these components alone are not likely capable of causing the observed toxicity.
“This suggests despite the correlations between NO 3 À and Cl À with the toxic ash types found here, the relatively low quantities of these components alone are not likely capable of causing the observed toxicity (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The toxicity of individual ions in single-substance tests can be used to judge their contribution in complex ash leachates.
- Interpretationcitation
Ash type and composition seem crucial to the level of toxicity on cladoceran species.
“Ash type and composition, therefore, seem crucial to the level of toxicity on cladoceran species, as also demonstrated previously (Campos et al. 2012;Silva et al. 2015;Brito et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Chen et al. (2018) found that PAH concentrations were significantly higher in black wildfire ash (moderate burn severity) in comparison with white wildfire ash (high burn severity).
“Chen et al. (2018) found that PAHs concentrations were significantly higher in black wildfire ash (moderate burn severity) in comparison with white wildfire ash (high burn severity).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al. 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The proportion of methylated/total PAHs is usually considered an indicator of combustion completeness as during combustion, the methylated component of the compound is lost first.
“The proportion of methylated/total PAHs is usually considered an indicator of combustion completeness as during combustion, the methylated component of the compound is lost first (Keiluweit et al. 2012) (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keiluweit et al. 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
It is likely that low-molecular-weight PAHs preferentially recondense in the ash layer and are retained in microporous structures of pyrogenic material.
“It is, however, likely that these PAHs preferentially recondense in the ash layer and are retained in microporous structures of pyrogenic material (Santı ´n et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Santı ´n et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
pH greatly reduces the leaching of amphoteric elements such as Al, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn.
“pH greatly reduces the leaching of amphoteric elements (e.g.Al, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) (Fedje et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fedje et al. 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The limited number of studies focusing on Na+, Cl-, SO4 2- and NO3- exports after a fire have found maximum levels sampled in ash fall well below recommended safe limits.
“The limited number of studies focusing on Na þ , Cl À , SO 4 2À and NO 3 À exports after a fire have found maximum levels sampled in ash fall well below recommended safe limits (Smith et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al. 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Other studies support the idea that low-molecular-weight PAHs recondense in ash, reporting high concentrations of Naph and Phe or Naph, Chry, Benz(a)anthracene and Acenaphthylene from wood burning.
“Other studies support this idea, reporting high concentrations of Naph and Phe (Kim et al. 2011) or Naph, Chrysene (Chry), Benz(a)anthracene and Acenaphthylene (Campos et al. 2012) from wood burning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
The effects of ash contamination on higher trophic organisms such as Daphnia magna are expected to be primarily indirect through the propagation of toxicity across the food chain via bottom-up bioaccumulation processes.
“and thus the effects of ash contamination on these higher trophic organisms are expected to be primarily indirect through the propagation of toxicity across the food chain via bottom-up bioaccumulation processes (Abrantes et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abrantes et al. 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Despite the variations in ash composition and the subsequent significant differences in Daphnia magna immobilisation, it is difficult to isolate the primary causes of toxicity.
“Despite the variations in ash composition and the subsequent significant differences in D. magna immobilisation, it is difficult to isolate the primary causes of toxicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The results presented here, along with other studies, appear to justify concerns around the impacts of wildfire ash on aquatic biota and water quality even without the assessment of bioaccumulation processes.
“The results presented here, along with other studies, appear to justify the concerns around the impacts of wildfire ash on aquatic biota and water quality even without the assessment of bioaccumulation processes (Campos et al. 2012;Brito et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campos et al. 2012;Brito et al. 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The six ash types studied are representative of wildfire ash produced in contrasting ecosystems.
- Interpretationreasoning
None of these components appear likely to have directly caused the immobilisation response observed.
“None of these components, however, appear likely to have directly caused the immobilisation response (ecotoxicity) observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is perhaps more likely that these components, and possible others such as Ca, have contributed indirectly to the observed toxicity.
“It is perhaps more likely that these components, and possible others (e.g.Ca), have contributed indirectly to the observed toxicity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Frisťák et al. found that during pyrolysis methylated aromatics mainly bind to insoluble carbon fractions or get trapped in microporous structures of pyrogenic material and are therefore unlikely to be bioavailable and hazardous to freshwater systems.
“In an assessment of the methylated PAHs composition of sludge-derived pyrogenic material, Fris ˇta ´k et al. (2019) found during pyrolysis methylated aromatics mainly bind to insoluble carbon fractions or get trapped in microporous structures of pyrogenic material and, therefore, are unlikely to be bioavailable and hazardous to freshwater systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fris ˇta ´k et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
This may be one reason why the PAH concentrations are not associated with toxicity in Daphnia magna here.
“This may be one reason why the PAHs concentrations are not associated with toxicity in D. magna here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Even when using a standardised laboratory approach, as employed here, it remains difficult to untangle the effects of such components from those caused by other variables in such complex samples.
“Even when using a standardised laboratory approach, as employed here, it remains difficult to untangle the effects of such components from those caused by other variables in such complex samples (Wilde et al. 2006;Silva et al. 2015;Brito et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilde et al. 2006;Silva et al. 2015;Brito et al. 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
In addition to pH and EC, there are likely components that are not necessarily toxic by themselves but could be variables influencing toxicity at certain concentrations, such as DOC, Na, Ca and Mg.
“In addition to the most likely, if indirect, influential parameters pH and EC, there are also likely components that are not necessarily toxic by themselves but could be variables influencing toxicity at certain concentrations (e.g.DOC, Na, Ca and Mg) (Freitas and Rocha 2011;Simplı ´cio et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Freitas and Rocha 2011;Simplı ´cio et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Physical characteristics of the ash types may also be a possible cause of immobilisation, as variations in particle size and distribution of suspended particulate matter in the unfiltered samples used could have compromised the food intake and locomotive ability of Daphnia magna, leading to immobilisation or death.
“Physical characteristics of the ash types may also be a possible cause of immobilisation as variations in particle size and distribution of the suspended particulate matter in the unfiltered samples used could have compromised the food intake and locomotive ability of D. magna, leading to immobilisation or death (Brito et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brito et al. 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 54
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAustralian eucalypt, USA chaparral and Canadian spruce ash caused significant toxicity (immobilisation) to Daphnia magna.
“whereas the Australian eucalypt, USA chaparral and Canadian spruce ash all caused significant toxicity (immobilisation).”
- Also stated in: § Acute toxicity test · plain
“High levels of D. magna immobilisation were recorded at both 24-and 48-h exposure for three of the six ash types tested: AUS, USA and CAN (P , 0.001 for all three ash types)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Acute toxicity test · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAl (range 1320-22 600 mg kg−1) and Fe (range 979-30 600 mg kg−1) were both present in high concentrations throughout the ash samples.
“with Al (range 1320-22 600 mg kg À1 ) and Fe (range 979-30 600 mg kg À1 ) both present in high concentrations throughout.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere are significant differences between the chemical composition and toxicity of the six wildfire ash types studied.
“We found significant differences between the chemical composition and toxicity of these ash types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHigh pH and EC values were both characteristic features of the ash types producing immobilisation of Daphnia magna.
“High pH and EC values were both characteristic features of the ash types producing immobilisation of Daphnia magna tested (see Acute toxicity test section).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA characteristic component of the CAN sample was high levels of soluble Ca, despite the total concentration in dry ash being relatively similar to that of the AUS, SPA and USA ash.
“A characteristic component of the CAN sample (identified by PCA, Fig. 1) was the high levels of soluble Ca, despite the total concentration in dry ash being relatively similar to that of the AUS, SPA and USA ash (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite overall similarities in ash solubility, there are substantial variations among the ash types, making their chemical profiles notably different.
“Despite the overall similarities in ash solubility in the ash leachates, there are also substantial variations among the ash types, making their chemical profiles notably different.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningpH within the bioassays themselves was notably less variable (7.31-9.08) than in the leachates, likely due to dilution and addition of culture medium.
“pH within the bioassays themselves, however, was notably less variable (7.31-9.08),likely due to differences in dilution between leachates and the bioassay testing, and the addition of the culture medium in the latter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNa (2-77%) and Hg (5-57%) solubility were highly variable and they are clearly the most soluble of the components analysed.
“The levels of Na (2-77%) and Hg (5-57%) solubility were highly variable and they are clearly the most soluble of the components analysed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CAN sample had notably high levels of Ca (5864 mg kg−1) and SO4 (32 289 mg kg−1).
“There were also notably high levels of, for example, Ca (5864 mg kg À1 ) and SO 4 2À (32 289 mg kg À1 ) in the CAN sample;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe AUS sample had notably high levels of B (85 mg kg−1) and Na (3893 mg kg−1).
“B (85 mg kg À1 ) and Na (3893 mg kg À1 ) in the AUS sample;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGenerally, the quantity of each ring type decreases sequentially with the number of rings (2 > 3 > 4 > 5 and 6), with the exception of the USA sample, which had a relatively similar quantity of three-, four-, five- and six-ring PAHs.
“Generally, the quantity of each ring type decreases sequentially with the number of rings, 2 .3 .4 .5 and 6 with the exception of the USA sample, which had a relatively similar quantity of three-, four-, fiveand six-ring PAHs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe most abundant ions in all leachates were SO4, Cl and Na+, likely owing to them forming very soluble salts.
“The most abundant ions in all leachates were SO 4 2À , Cl À and Na þ (Table 2), likely owing to them forming very soluble salts (i.e.sulfates or chlorides).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPC1 is most strongly positively correlated with Mn, Fe, Zn, As, Pb and PO4 levels and most strongly negatively correlated with pH, EC, NO3, Cl, Hg and SO4.
“PC1 is most strongly positively correlated with Mn, Fe, Zn, As, Pb and PO 4 3À levels and most strongly negatively correlated with pH, EC, NO 3 À , Cl À , Hg and SO 4 2À (Table 3 and Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe proportion of methylated and non-methylated PAHs was very similar in all samples, with approximately three times more non-methylated PAHs in each ash type except the USA ash, which contained over 15 times the amount of non-methylated PAHs.
“The proportion of the methylated and non-methylated PAHs was very similar in all the samples with approximately three times more non-methylated PAHs in each ash type, except the USA ash, which contained over 15 times the amount of nonmethylated PAHs (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe URIA sample had notably high levels of Cu (5158 mg kg−1) and As (329 mg kg−1).
“and Cu (5158 mg kg À1 ) and As (329 mg kg À1 ) in the URIA sample (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datapH and electrical conductivity in leachates varied notably across ash samples, with pH ranging from 7.9 in UK ash to 11.2 in USA ash.
“pH and electrical conductivity (EC) measured in the leachates notably varied across ash samples, with pH levels ranging from moderately alkaline in the UK ash (7.9), to strongly alkaline in the USA ash (11.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datapH, EC, NO3, Cl, Hg and SO4 were most closely correlated with the three ash types producing significant immobilisation of D. magna, whereas Al, Cu, Ni, NH4, As, Fe, Mn, PO4, Pb and Cd were more closely correlated with the three non-toxic ash types.
“A biplot of the standardised PC1 and PC2 values (Fig. 1) shows which components best characterised each ash type and pH, EC, NO 3 À , Cl À , Hg and SO 4 2À were most closely correlated with the three ash types producing significant immobilisation of D. magna, whereas Al, Cu, Ni, NH 4 þ , As, Fe, Mn, PO 4 3À , Pb, Cd were more closely correlated with the three non-toxic ash types (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the UK sample, PO4 (620 mg kg−1), Fe (4378 mg kg−1) and Mn (9292 mg kg−1) were notably high compared with the other ash types.
“For example, in the UK sample, PO 4 3À (620 mg kg À1 ) and metals such as Fe (4378 mg kg À1 ) and Mn (9292 mg kg À1 ) were notably high in comparison with the other ash types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhenanthrene was the most common three-ring PAH, except in the UK sample where it was acenaphthylene.
“Phenanthrene was the most common three-ring PAH, except in the UK sample where it was acenaphthylene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe water-soluble (leachate) composition of the ash types was highly variable, with the most abundant components being SO4 (1203-10 180 mg kg−1), Cl (228-1509 mg kg−1) and Na (17-3893 mg kg−1).
“The water-soluble (leachate) composition of the ash types was also highly variable (Table 2), with the most abundant components being SO 4 2À (range 1203-10 180 mg kg À1 ), Cl À (range 228-1509 mg kg À1 ) and Na (range 17-3893 mg kg À1 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn average, the proportions of water-soluble Al, Pb, Mn, Fe and Zn were <1% total dry weight; As, Si, Ca, P, Ni, Cu and Cd were <5%; and Mg was <10%.
“On average, the proportions of watersoluble Al, Pb, Mn, Fe, Zn were ,1% total dry weight; As, Si, Ca, P, Ni, Cu, Cd were ,5% and Mg was ,10%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe total concentration of the 16 USEPA priority PAHs ranged from 1155 to 14 078 ng g−1 ash, with the highest total in the UK ash (12 336 ng g−1 ash).
“The total concentration of these priority contaminants ranged from 1155 to 14 078 ng g À1 ash, the highest total being found in the UK ash originating from an upland grassland ecosystem in south Wales ( P 16 EPA PAHs: 12 336 ng g À1 ash) (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCd presented as a distinct principal component of the SPA ash with a comparatively high soluble concentration (7 mg kg−1) and as the only sample to register a solubility percentage greater than 1% (2.85%).
“Despite this, Cd presented as a distinct principal component of the SPA ash with a comparatively high soluble concentration (7 mg kg À1 ) and as the only sample to register a solubility percentage greater than 1% (2.85%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe URIA ash contained comparatively high concentrations of soluble Cu (5158 mg kg−1) and the carcinogen As (329 mg kg−1).
“This ash contained comparatively high concentrations of soluble Cu (5158 mg kg À1 ) and the carcinogen As (329 mg kg À1 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe relationship between pH and immobilisation is very similar between the leachates and bioassays pH results, with higher pH values characteristic of the ash types producing immobilisation in D. magna.
“Crucially, however, the relationship between pH and immobilisation is very similar between the leachates and bioassays pH results, with higher pH values characteristic of the ash types producing immobilisation in D. magna.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe pH values in the bioassays themselves were notably lower and less variable than in the leachate results used during the PCA analysis and within a range thought acceptable for the survival of D. magna and similar cladoceran species.
“The pH values in the bioassays themselves, however, were notably lower and less variable than in the leachate results used during the PCA analysis and within a range thought acceptable for the survival of D. magna and similar cladoceran species (OECD 2004) (Table 5 and 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe SPA ash has a relatively insoluble overall profile with notably high concentrations of Al, Fe, Zn, Cb, Pb and As in the dry ash but limited to no leaching of Al, Fe, Zn and Pb into the water-soluble extract.
“The SPA ash has a relatively insoluble overall profile with notably high concentrations of the metals Al, Fe, Zn, Cb, Pb and the metalloid As in the dry ash (Supplementary material S1) but limited to no leaching of Al, Fe, Zn and Pb into the water-soluble extract (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough variations in combustion completeness could be related to PAH content here, the proportion of methylated PAHs in the UK ash is similar to that of the other samples tested.
“Although variations in combustion completeness could be related to PAHs content here, the proportion of methylated PAHs in the UK ash is similar to that of the other samples tested (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe full range of PAH concentrations found here are within the range 1000-50 000 ng g−1 (Σ16 EPA PAHs) found by Santín et al. (2017) analysing PAHs in pine forest floor and wood under wildfire charring and slow pyrolysis.
“The full range of PAH concentrations found here are within the range 1000-50 000 ng g 1 ( P 16 EPA PAHs) found by Santı ´n et al. (2017) analysing PAHs in pine forest floor and wood under wildfire charring and slow pyrolysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Santı ´n et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataElevated water-soluble concentrations of metal and metalloid contaminants Mn, Fe, Zn, Pb, Cu and As did not produce any significant inhibition and tended to be characteristic of the non-toxic ash types.
“Elevated water-soluble concentrations of metal and metalloid contaminants (Mn, Fe, Zn, Pb, Cu and As) did not produce any significant inhibition and tended to be characteristic of the non-toxic ash types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe chemical characterisation of the six wildfire ash types shows an overall similar composition of elements, but significant variations in the concentration, reactivity and solubility of these elements.
“The chemical characterisation of the six wildfire ash types shows an overall similar composition of elements, but significant variations in the concentration, reactivity and solubility of these elements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDuring wildland fires, combustion of fuels releases organic and inorganic components into the atmosphere and concentrates some of them into wildfire ash left on the ground.
“During wildland fires, combustion of fuels releases a wide range of organic and inorganic components into the atmosphere but also concentrates some of them into wildfire ash left on the ground (Bodı ´et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bodı ´et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAsh has begun to receive increasing recognition as a source of diffuse contamination in freshwater systems, and detrimental impacts on lake and stream biota including fish, amphibians, macroinvertebrates and algae have been observed.
“Ash has also begun to receive increasing recognition as a source of diffuse contamination in freshwater systems and detrimental impacts on both lake and stream biota, including fish (e.g.Nunes et al. 2017;Oliveira-Filho et al. 2018;Gonino et al. 2019a), amphibians (Pilliod et al. 2003), macroinvertebrates (Brito et al. 2017) and algae (Campos et al. 2012) have all been observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBrito et al. (2017) found that all three Brazilian Cerrado ash types caused toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia, none affected Biomphalaria glabrata, and only one type was toxic for Danio rerio.
“A similar study by Brito et al. (2017) tested toxicity over acute exposures (48 h) of three types of ash from the Brazilian Cerrado ecoregion on the planktonic crustacean Ceriodaphnia dubia, the fish Danio rerio and the mollusc Biomphalaria glabrata and found that all ash types caused toxicity to C. dubia, none affected B. glabrata and only one type was toxic for D. rerio.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brito et al. 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPAHs and heavy metals present major biological concern owing to their carcinogenic potential, persistence within ecosystems and tendency to bio-accumulate.
“Both present major biological concern owing to their carcinogenic potential, persistence within ecosystems and tendency to bio-accumulate (Smith et al. 2011;Chen et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationKey areas receiving particular attention are the production and mobilisation of PAHs and heavy metals.
“Key areas receiving particular attention as a result of concern about their environmental effects are the production and mobilisation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals (e.g.Vila-Escale ´et al. 2007;Campos et al. 2012;Oliveira-Filho et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe leachate data were chosen for PCA because the leachate fraction is likely the most bioavailable fraction and therefore the most likely to have affected Daphnia over an acute exposure.
“The leachates data were chosen for this analysis, as opposed to the total elements data, because this is likely the most bioavailable fraction and, therefore, the most likely to have affected the daphnia over an acute exposure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFresh wildfire ash typically consists of mineral materials and charred organic components, is noncohesive, has low density, and is not attached to soil, which facilitates its mobilisation and transport by post-fire water and wind erosion.
“Fresh wildfire ash typically consists of mineral materials and charred organic components, is noncohesive, has a low density, and is not attached to the soil, which facilitates its mobilisation and transportation by post-fire water and wind erosion (Bodı ´et al. 2014;Abraham et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bodı ´et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Abraham et al. 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese contaminants are thought to have complex impacts on water quality and their biological effects in aquatic systems have been observed to persist across long spatial and temporal scales.
“These contaminants are thought to have complex impacts on water quality and the biological effects of these in aquatic systems have been observed to persist across long spatial and temporal scales (Earl and Blinn 2003;Costa et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Earl and Blinn 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Costa et al. 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNegative impacts of Brazilian sugarcane ash have been observed on several native fish species over 24-h acute exposures but not for two non-native fish species.
“At higher trophic levels, negative impacts of Brazilian sugarcane ash have also been observed on several native fish species (Astyanax lacustris, Moenkhausia bonita and M. forestii) over 24-h acute exposures but not for two non-native fish species (Oreochromis niloticus and Poecilia reticulata) (Gonino et al. 2019b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gonino et al. 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningA wide range of ash concentrations was tested in an attempt to represent the potential variability of different natural scenarios.
“Little is known to date on wildfire ash concentrations in water bodies; therefore, a wide range of ash concentrations was tested, trying to represent the potential variability of different natural scenarios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Little is known about wildfire ash concentrations in water bodies, so the tested concentration range is needed to represent natural variability.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDaphnia magna is extensively used in ecological and toxicological studies as a sensitive indicator of the effects of contaminants on aquatic biota.
“This species is extensively used in ecological and toxicological studies as a sensitive indicator of the effects of contaminants on aquatic biota (OECD 2004; USEPA 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites OECD 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites USEPA 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDaphnia spp. are particularly relevant to freshwater lentic ecosystems and ideal for investigating contamination potential in downstream waterbodies.
“Daphnia spp.are also particularly relevant to freshwater lentic ecosystems (lakes, reservoirs and ponds) and ideal for investigating contamination potential in downstream waterbodies (Robinson and Thorn 2005;Nikinmaa 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Robinson and Thorn 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nikinmaa 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe majority of general studies into the effects of wildfire on water quality have focused on runoff amounts and nutrient levels, and only more recently has increased research attention been given to pyrolytic substances, chemical elements and biological reactivity.
“The majority of the general studies into the effects of wildfire on water quality have focused on runoff amounts and nutrient levels and only more recently has increased research attention been given to pyrolytic substances, chemical elements and biological reactivity (Shakesby and Doerr 2006;Campos et al. 2012;Silva et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRelease of soluble elements and particulate matter from eroded ash and underlying soil into aquatic systems following fires can cause increases in water turbidity, pH, organic matter, suspended sediment and conductivity and depletion of dissolved oxygen.
“The release of soluble elements and particulate matter from eroded ash and underlying soil into aquatic systems following fires can cause increases in water turbidity, pH, organic matter, suspended sediment and conductivity and depletion of dissolved oxygen, among other effects (Smith et al. 2011;Tsai et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFire activity is projected to increase in many locations and ecotypes as a result of climate and societal changes.
“Fire activity is projected to increase in many locations and ecotypes as a result of climate and societal changes, making the full understanding of their impacts crucial (Scholze et al. 2006;Chen et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe acute toxicity tests were conducted according to OECD 202 guidelines, with the exception of full pH adjustment.
“The acute toxicity tests were conducted according to the OECD 202 (OECD 2004) guidelines, with the exception of full pH adjustment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OECD 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCampos et al. (2012) and Silva et al. (2015) found no significant impact of eucalypt ash on Daphnia magna reproduction or immobilisation over chronic (21 day) and acute (48 h) exposures respectively.
“Campos et al. (2012) and Silva et al. (2015), for example, found no significant impact of eucalypt ash on the planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna reproduction or immobilisation rates over a chronic (21 day) and acute (48 h) exposures respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThese studies demonstrate the variability and complexity of influencing factors in relation to the impacts of ash contamination on aquatic biota, highlighting the limited breadth of available research in this area.
“These studies demonstrate the variability and complexity of influencing factors in relation to the impacts of ash contamination on aquatic biota, highlighting the limited breadth of available research in this area (Hallema et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hallema et al. 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAsh is not usually examined as a distinct part of post-fire sediment and few laboratory studies have characterised the composition of wildfire ash.
“Ash is however not usually examined as a distinct part of the post-fire sediment and few laboratory studies have characterised the composition of wildfire ash (Bodı ´et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bodı ´et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationB and Na are often found in high concentrations in ash leachates, particularly B in other eucalyptus ash tested.
“These elements are often found in high concentrations in ash leachates (Jung et al. 2009;Pereira et al. 2011), particularly B in other eucalyptus ash tested (Freitas and Rocha 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe CAN ash tested here produced significant immobilisation of Daphnia magna over the 48-h exposure, potentially influenced by its high Ca concentration.
“The CAN ash tested here produced significant immobilisation of Daphnia magna over the 48-h exposure also potentially influenced by its high Ca concentration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBrito et al. (2017), assessing Brazilian Cerrado ash types, also found little qualitative difference in the overall composition of the different ash tested, but large variations in the concentration of chemical elements between sampling areas.
“Brito et al. (2017), assessing Brazilian Cerrado ash types, also found there were little qualitative differences in the overall composition of the different ash tested, but large variations in the concentration of the chemical elements between sampling areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brito et al. 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFire dynamics (e.g. burn temperature) and soil properties are important features in the composition of elements within ash.
“Fire dynamics (e.g.burn temperature) and soil properties are also important features in the composition of elements within ash (Pitman 2006;Bodı ´et al. 2014;Chen et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHigh Na+ levels in freshwater systems can present an issue for water purification processes as they cannot be removed using conventional methods.
“High Na þ levels in freshwater systems can present an issue for water purification processes as they cannot be removed using conventional methods (Smith et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al. 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOxides and hydroxides of Ca, Mg, Si and P particularly tend to be abundant in wildfire ash, as found in the ash tested here.
“In general, oxides and hydroxides of Ca, Mg, Si and P particularly tend to be abundant in wildfire ash (Pereira and U ´beda 2010;Silva et al. 2015) as found in the ash tested here (Supplementary material Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pereira and U ´beda 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Silva et al. 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStiernström et al. (2013) propose that Ca might be one of the key elements responsible for the ecotoxicity of ash eluates on the crustacean Nitocra spinipes, despite Ca not being classified as individually ecotoxic.
“Stiernstro ¨m et al. (2013) even propose that Ca might be one of the key elements responsible for the ecotoxicity of ash eluates on the crustacean Nitocra spinipes, despite Ca not being classified as individually ecotoxic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stiernstro ¨m et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis P-Ca interaction may influence algal and cyanobacterial growth (and thus eutrophication) by regulating P levels in freshwater systems.
“This P-Ca interaction may influence algal and cyanobacterial growth (and thus, eutrophication) by regulating P levels in freshwater systems (Bladon et al. 2008;Blake et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCa is not normally considered hazardous, but can significantly influence the overall toxicity of ash eluates.
“In the broader context, Ca is not normally considered hazardous, but can significantly influence the overall toxicity of ash eluates (e.g. its strong relationship with SO 4 2À leaching) (Mount et al. 1997;Tian et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIt is unclear why the solubility of Ca is notably higher in the CAN ash, but it may be responsible for the reduced PO4 levels in the CAN leachate as P has a tendency to precipitate in the presence of Ca.
“It is unclear why the solubility of Ca is notably higher in the CAN ash in comparison with the other ash types (Jung et al. 2009;Brito et al. 2017), but it may be responsible for the reduced PO 4 3À levels (1.2 mg kg À1 ) in the CAN leachate as P has a tendency to precipitate in the presence of Ca (Diaz et al. 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese results are similar to those found in other studies assessing post-fire runoff and ash leachates in a range of ecosystem types.
“These results are similar to those found in other studies assessing post-fire runoff and ash leachates in a range of ecosystem types (Jung et al. 2009;Pereira et al. 2011) and in agreement with the general concentration trend of alkali (Na, K) .alkaline (Ca, Mg) .. heavy metals (Pb, Cd and Hg) found by Santı ´n et al. (2015) in eucalypt forest ash.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSimilar dry quantities of Cd were recorded by Brito et al. (2017) assessing Brazilian Cerrado ash types (0.1-0.3 mg kg−1) but Cd solubility was lower in these ash types (<0.01%).
“Similar dry quantities of Cd were recorded by Brito et al. (2017) assessing Brazilian Cerrado ash types (0.1-0.3 mg kg À1 ) but Cd solubility was lower in these ash types (,0.01%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brito et al. 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany anthropogenic and natural conditions have been shown to increase nutrient concentrations to toxic levels.
“Many anthropogenic (e.g. oil and gas production, irrigation methods and industrial and agricultural processes) and natural (e.g.sediment pore waters and burning) conditions have been shown to increase nutrient concentrations to toxic levels (e.g.Hoke et al. 1993;Ferreira et al. 2005;Mast and Clow 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hoke et al. 1993;Ferreira et al. 2005;Mast and Clow 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe data available on PAH release following a fire are quite limited.
“The data available on PAHs release following a fire, however, are quite limited (Vila-Escale ´et al. 2007;Kim et al. 2011;Campos et al. 2012;Rey-Salgueiro et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe type of fuel and variations in combustion temperatures and oxygen availability are thought to strongly affect the concentration and type of PAHs in ash.
“The type of fuel and variations in combustion temperatures and oxygen availability are thought to strongly affect the concentration and type of PAHs in ash (Enell et al. 2008;Rey-Salgueiro et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe organic fraction of ash may also contain organic contaminants of biological concern.
“The organic fraction of ash may also contain organic contaminants of biological concern (Vila-Escale ´et al. 2007;Chen et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationpH has an inconsistent relationship with toxicity, and results are often difficult to interpret.
“pH has an inconsistent relationship with toxicity, and, often, results are difficult to interpret (Wilde et al. 2006;Silva et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilde et al. 2006;Silva et al. 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSimilar elevated soluble levels of Cu have been found in mixed eucalyptus ash (Cu 5100-6200 mg kg−1) by Santín et al. (2015).
“Similar elevated soluble levels of Cu have, however, been found in mixed eucalyptus ash (Cu 5100-6200 mg kg À1 ) by Santı ´n et al. (2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Santı ´n et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLow pH values encourage the leaching of oxyanion-forming (As, B, Cr, Sb and V) and cation-forming elements (Ca), and neutral pH greatly reduces the leaching of amphoteric elements (Al, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn).
“Low pH values, for example, encourage the leaching of oxyanion-forming (As, B, Cr, Sb and V) and cation-forming elements (Ca), and neutral pH greatly reduces the leaching of amphoteric elements (e.g.Al, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) (Fedje et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fedje et al. 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAsh studies of beech and similar species were dominated by Naph and by Benzo(ghi)perylen, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Chry, Triphenylene and Phe but at lower concentrations.
“Ash studies of beech and similar species (Bundt et al. 2001) were dominated by Naph and by Benzo(ghi)perylen, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Chry, Triphenylene and Phe but at lower concentrations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bundt et al. 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExtreme values of pH and EC have a detrimental impact on zooplankton species.
“It is well established that extreme values of pH and EC have a detrimental impact on zooplankton species (Mount et al. 1997;Franklin et al. 2000;Silva et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationScott and Crunkilton demonstrated that NO3- produces immobilisation of Daphnia magna at 462 mg L-1, with no observable effect concentration at 358 mg L-1.
“Scott and Crunkilton (2000) demonstrated NO 3 À produces immobilisation of D. magna at 462 mg L À1 with no observable effect concentration at 358 mg L À1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scott and Crunkilton (2000)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe influence of key nutrients on Daphnia magna immobilisation is perhaps less well established.
“The influence of key nutrients on D. magna immobilisation is perhaps less well established (Smith et al. 2011)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al. 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenPAH concentrations were only determined in bulk ash samples.
“It has to be noted that PAHs concentrations were only determined in bulk ash samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIt is likely that the high to very high PAH concentrations recorded in the ash studied here would be dramatically reduced if the leachable fraction of the samples were tested, as opposed to total concentrations, making the portion more accessible to interact with aquatic fauna lower.
“It is likely the high to very high PAHs concentrations recorded in the ash studied here would be dramatically reduced if the leachable fraction of the samples were tested, as opposed to total concentrations, therefore making the portion more accessible to interact with aquatic fauna lower (Fris ˇta ´k et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fris ˇta ´k et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results presented here justify concerns around the downstream contamination potential of ash in certain ecosystems on aquatic biota and highlight the need for a greater understanding of possible direct and indirect chemical causalities.
“The results presented here justify the concerns around the downstream contamination potential of ash in certain ecosystems on aquatic biota and highlight the need for a greater understanding of possible direct and indirect chemical causalities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The six ash types studied are representative of wildfire ash produced in contrasting ecosystems.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEarlier work has suggested that macroinvertebrate species such as Daphnia magna are less sensitive to contamination than lower trophic species.
“Earlier work has suggested macroinvertebrate species such as D. magna are less sensitive to contamination than lower trophic species (Campos et al. 2012)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campos et al. 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA few notable studies have demonstrated no observable effect of ash toxicity on daphnid survival or reproduction rates over both acute 48 h and chronic 21 day exposures, but significant impacts have been observed on lower trophic species such as bacteria, algae and macrophytes.
“A few notable studies have demonstrated this premise with no observable effect of ash toxicity on daphnid survival or reproduction rates over both acute (48 h) and chronic (21 day) exposures, but significant impacts have been observed on lower trophic species (bacteria, algae and macrophytes) (Campos et al. 2012;Silva et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campos et al. 2012;Silva et al. 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt continues to prove difficult to identify specific causes of toxicity in aquatic biota using test substances as complex and variable as wildfire ash.
“It continues to prove difficult to identify specific causes of toxicity in aquatic biota using test substances as complex and variable as wildfire ash.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningCombining the detailed chemical characterisation of the ash types with the ecotoxicology results helps to provide further insight into the composition and variations in ash produced in different ecosystem types and potential implications of wildfire ash contamination on the environment.
“Combining the detailed chemical characterisation of the ash types with the ecotoxicology results helps to provide further insight into the composition and variations in ash produced in different ecosystem types and potential implications of wildfire ash contamination on the environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of relationship between high levels of PAHs and toxicity found here and in other studies raises questions about the bioavailability of PAHs in this context.
“The lack of relationship between high levels of PAHs and toxicity found here and in other studies (Campos et al. 2012;Silva et al. 2015) raises questions about the bioavailability of PAHs in this context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campos et al. 2012;Silva et al. 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Little is known about wildfire ash concentrations in water bodies, so the tested concentration range is needed to represent natural variability.
“Little is known to date on wildfire ash concentrations in water bodies; therefore, a wide range of ash concentrations was tested, trying to represent the potential variability of different natural scenarios.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The composite ash samples collected from each ecosystem type are representative of wildfire ash produced in those ecosystems.
“Six composite ash samples were collected after wildland fires, before any rainfall, in each of the selected ecosystems types (Table 1): Australian eucalypt forest (AUS), USA chaparral (USA), Canadian spruce forest (CAN), Spanish heathland”
The paper relies on this without support.
Not adjusting pH in the bioassays does not cause significant changes to the test substances or create interactions that invalidate the toxicity results.
“It is crucially important that pH adjustment does not cause significant changes to the test substances and owing to the complex and varying compositions and reactivity of wildfire ash, potential interactions are unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No other research has been conducted on the PAH composition of wildfire ash originating from comparable grassland ecosystems.
“It is unclear why this is the case as no other research has been conducted on the PAHs composition of wildfire ash originating from comparable grassland ecosystems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ions such as Cl- and NO3- are required at minimum levels to support aquatic life.
“as ions such as Cl À and NO 3 À are required at minimum levels to support aquatic life.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The toxicity of individual ions in single-substance tests can be used to judge their contribution in complex ash leachates.
“This suggests despite the correlations between NO 3 À and Cl À with the toxic ash types found here, the relatively low quantities of these components alone are not likely capable of causing the observed toxicity (Table 2).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The six ash types studied are representative of wildfire ash produced in contrasting ecosystems.
“The chemical characterisation of the six wildfire ash types shows an overall similar composition of elements, but significant variations in the concentration, reactivity and solubility of these elements.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While the lethal effects of wildfire ash on freshwater microcrustaceans have been documented, environmentally sublethal exposures remain comparatively underexplored.
“While the lethal effects of wildfire ash on freshwater microcrustaceans have been documented [17,23], environmentally sublethal exposures, more likely to occur under postfire conditions, remain comparatively underexplored.”
From Wildfire Ash Alters Freshwater Crustacean Behavior: Disentangling the Contributions of Suspended Macroparticles and Ash‐Induced Alkalinization (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
As wildfire ash leachates increase water pH, pH-corrected treatments were prepared by adding HCl to target pH 7.0.
“As wildfire ash leachates increase water pH [15,23], pH-corrected treatments (target pH 7.0) were prepared by adding 0.5 mL of 0.4 mol L -1 HCl (~0.2 mmol) to the ash stock solution before dilution to the experimental concentrations, following OECD 202 guidance [58].”
From Wildfire Ash Alters Freshwater Crustacean Behavior: Disentangling the Contributions of Suspended Macroparticles and Ash‐Induced Alkalinization (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Adverse effects of both toxic compounds and nutrients in wildfire ash, highly dependent on dosage and duration of exposure, have been reported in aquatic ecosystems for macroinvertebrates, amphibians, fish and algae.
“Adverse effects of both toxic compounds and nutrients in wildfire ash, which are highly dependent on dosage and duration of exposure, have been reported in aquatic ecosystems for macroinvertebrates (Brito et al., 2017;Harper et al., 2019), amphibians, fish and algae (e.g., Campos et al., 2012;Gonino et al., 2019;Oliveira-Filho et al., 2018;Pilliod et al., 2003).”
From Chemical characteristics of wildfire ash across the globe and their environmental and socio-economic implications (2023) · cites this paper as Harper et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Sulfate range excludes the Canadian ash value
MinorThe stated maximum water-soluble sulfate concentration is 10 180 mg kg À1, but the same section reports 32 289 mg kg À1 for the Canadian ash.
“SO 4 2À (range 1203-10 180 mg kg À1 )”
“SO 4 2À (32 289 mg kg À1 ) in the CAN sample”
Conclusion calls all elements low-solubility despite stated exceptions
MinorThe conclusion says solubility was low for all elements and ash types, but the results identify Na and Hg as exceptions, with solubilities reaching 77% and 57%.
“The solubility of all elements was low for all ash types comparing the total and leachate characterisation data.”
“The levels of Na (2-77%) and Hg (5-57%) solubility were highly variable and they are clearly the most soluble of the components analysed.”
Two different UK priority-PAH totals are reported
MinorThe UK total for the 16 priority PAHs is reported as 12 336 ng g À1 here, but as 14 078 ng g À1 elsewhere in the results and in Table 4.
“the highest total being found in the UK ash originating from an upland grassland ecosystem in south Wales ( P 16 EPA PAHs: 12 336 ng g À1 ash)”
“with a range of 1155 ng g À1 in the AUS ash to 14 078 ng g À1 in the UK ash (16 USEPA priority PAHs)”
Complete immobilisation is claimed below 25 g L À1
MinorTable 5 shows 75% immobilisation at 12.5 g L À1 and first shows 100% at 25 g L À1, not at a concentration less than 25 g L À1.
“a 100% immobilisation of D. magna individuals at less than 25 g ash L À1 within the first 24 h of exposure”
“| AUS | 0 | 5 | 10 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 8.81 | 6.25 | 6.25 | 11 | ,0.001 |”
Cites
Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent
Shakesby, R. A., & Doerr, S. H. (2006) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.10.006 · Cited by 1,346 · see citing works
Self-citationThe biochemistry of environmental heavy metal uptake by plants: implications for the food chain.
Peralta-Videa, J. R., Lopez, M. L., Narayan, M., Saupe, G., & Gardea-Torresdey, J. (2009) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2009.03.005 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems
Scholze, M., Knorr, W., Arnell, N. W., & Prentice, I. C. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601816103 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Wildfire effects on water quality in forest catchments: A review with implications for water supply
Smith, H. G., Sheridan, G. J., Lane, P. N. J., Nyman, P., & Haydon, S. (2011) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.043 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects
Bodí, M. B., Martin, D. A., Balfour, V. N., Santín, C., Doerr, S. H., Pereira, P., Cerdà, A., & Mataix-Solera, J. (2014) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.12.007 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Source of U.S. EPA's Sixteen PAH Priority Pollutants
Keith, L. H. (2014) · Polycyclic aromatic compounds · doi:10.1080/10406638.2014.892886 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Wood ash use in forestry – a review of the environmental impacts.
Pitman, R. M. (2006) · Forestry · doi:10.1093/forestry/cpl041 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply
Bladon, K. D., Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., & Stone, M. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es500130g · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Keiluweit, M., Kleber, M., Sparrow, M. A., Simoneit, B. R. T., & Prahl, F. G. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302125k · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Mount, D. R., Gulley, D. D., Hockett, J. R., Garrison, T. D., & Evans, J. M. (1997) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5620161005 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
pH-dependent toxicity of copper and uranium to a tropical freshwater alga (Chlorella sp.).
Franklin, N. M., Stauber, J. L., Markich, S. J., & Lim, R. P. (2000) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0166-445x(99)00042-9 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Chemical properties of ash derived from Eucalyptus litter and its effects on forest soils
Khanna, P. K., Raison, R. J., & Falkiner, R. A. (1994) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)90151-1 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Fire effects on aquatic ecosystems: an assessment of the current state of the science
Bixby, R. J., Cooper, S. D., Gresswell, R. E., Brown, L. E., Dahm, C. N., & Dwire, K. A. (2015) · Freshwater Science · doi:10.1086/684073 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Fire and amphibians in North America
Pilliod, D. S., Bury, R. B., Hyde, E. J., Pearl, C. A., & Corn, P. S. (2003) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00060-4 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Removal of hazardous metals from MSW fly ash – an evaluation of ash-leaching methods.
Karlfeldt Fedje, K., Ekberg, C., Skarnemark, G., & Steenari, B.-M. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.094 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Burned forests impact water supplies
Hallema, D. W., Sun, G., Caldwell, P. V., Norman, S. P., Cohen, E. C., Liu, Y., Bladon, K. D., & McNulty, S. G. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03735-6 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Effects of wildfire ash on water chemistry and biota in South‐Western U.S.A. streams
Earl, S. R., & Blinn, D. W. (2003) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01066.x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Wilde, K. L., Stauber, J. L., Markich, S. J., Franklin, N. M., & Brown, P. L. (2006) · Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00244-004-0256-0 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Solubility of inorganic phosphorus in stream water as influenced by pH and calcium concentration.
Diaz, O. A., Reddy, K. R., & Moore, P. A. (1994) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/0043-1354(94)90248-8 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Risk of post-fire metal mobilization into surface water resources: A review
Abraham, J., Dowling, K., & Florentine, S. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.096 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Santín, C., Doerr, S. H., Merino, A., Bucheli, T. D., Bryant, R., Ascough, P. L., Gao, X., & Masiello, C. A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10455-2 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationScott, G., & Crunkilton, R. L. (2000) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5620191211 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Santín, C., Doerr, S. H., Otero, X. L., & Chafer, C. J. (2015) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.041 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationVila-Escalé, M., Vegas-Vilarrúbia, T., & Prat, N. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.07.029 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Bladon, K. D., Silins, U., Wagner, M. J., Stone, M., Emelko, M. B., Mendoza, C. A., Devito, K. J., & Boon, S. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x08-071 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Effects of 2003 wildfires on stream chemistry in Glacier National Park, Montana
Mast, M. A., & Clow, D. W. (2008) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.7121 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Pereira, P., Úbeda, X., Martin, D., Mataix-Solera, J., & Guerrero, C. (2011) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2010.09.002 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
OLIVELLA, M., RIBALTA, T., DEFEBRER, A., MOLLET, J., & DELASHERAS, F. (2006) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.033 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Toxicity assessment of aqueous extracts of ash from forest fires
Silva, V., Pereira, J. L., Campos, I., Keizer, J. J., Gonçalves, F., & Abrantes, N. (2015) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2014.06.021 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Assessment of the toxicity of ash-loaded runoff from a recently burnt eucalypt plantation
Campos, I., Abrantes, N., Vidal, T., Bastos, A. C., Gonçalves, F., & Keizer, J. J. (2012) · European Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1007/s10342-012-0640-7 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HEAVY METALS RELEASED FROM ASHES AFTER A WILDFIRE
Pereira, P. A. D. S., & Úbeda, X. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management · doi:10.3846/jeelm.2010.02 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Distributions and leaching behaviors of toxic elements in fly ash.
Tian, Q., Guo, B., Nakama, S., & Sasaki, K. (2018) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.8b02096 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Chen, H., Chow, A. T., Li, X.-W., Ni, H.-G., Dahlgren, R. A., Zeng, H., & Wang, J.-J. (2018) · ACS Earth and Space Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00101 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Costa, M. R., Calvão, A. R., & Aranha, J. (2014) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.09.009 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Temporal patterns of solute loss following wildfires in Central Portugal
Ferreira, A. J. D., Coelho, C. O. A., Boulet, A. K., & Lopes, F. P. (2005) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf05043 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Santín, C., Otero, X. L., Doerr, S. H., & Chafer, C. J. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.116 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, E. J., Choi, S.-D., & Chang, Y.-S. (2011) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-011-0515-3 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Oliveira-Filho, E. C., Brito, D. Q., Dias, Z. M. B., Guarieiro, M. S., Carvalho, E. L., Fascineli, M. L., Niva, C. C., & Grisolia, C. K. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.051 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Nunes, B., Silva, V., Campos, I., Pereira, J. L., Pereira, P., Keizer, J. J., Gonçalves, F., & Abrantes, N. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.129 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
PAHs in the Ría de Arousa (NW Spain): A consideration of PAHs sources and abundance.
Pérez-Fernández, B., Viñas, L., Franco, M., & Bargiela, J. (2015) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.04.028 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationAquatic ecotoxicity of ashes from Brazilian savanna wildfires
Brito, D. Q., Passos, C. J. S., Muniz, D. H. F., & Oliveira-Filho, E. C. (2017) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9578-0 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Jung, H. Y., Hogue, T. S., Rademacher, L. K., & Meixner, T. (2009) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.7132 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Hoke, R. A., Giesy, J. P., Zabik, M., & Unger, M. (1993) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1006/eesa.1993.1042 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ash: determination of total and leachable concentrations.
Enell, A., Fuhrman, F., Lundin, L., Warfvinge, P., & Thelin, G. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.055 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Bundt, M., Krauss, M., Blaser, P., & Wilcke, W. (2001) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2001.3041296x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Gonino, G. M. R., Figueiredo, B. R. S., Manetta, G. I., Zaia Alves, G. H., & Benedito, E. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.022 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Gonino, G. M. R., Branco, P., Benedito, E., Ferreira, M. T., & Santos, J. M. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.108 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Rey‐Salgueiro, L., Martínez‐Carballo, E., Merino, A., Vega, J. A., Fonturbel, M. T., & Simal‐Gandara, J. (2018) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2806 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Simplício, N. D. C. S., Muniz, D. H. D. F., Rocha, F., Martins, D., Dias, Z., de Farias, B. C., & Oliveira-Filho, E. C. (2016) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics5010002 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Assessing PAH exposure in feral finfish from the Northwest Atlantic
Hellou, J., Leonard, J. D., Collier, T. K., & Ariese, F. (2005) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.11.012 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Tsai, K.-P., Uzun, H., Karanfil, T., & Chow, A. T. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01541 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Composition of Sediments in the Ría de Vigo (NW Spain)
Viñas, L., Franco, M. A., & González, J. J. (2008) · Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00244-008-9230-6 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationFreitas, E. C., & Rocha, O. (2010) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-010-0559-z · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Bodí, M. B., Martin, D. A., Balfour, V. N., Santín, C., Doerr, S. H., Pereira, P., Cerdà, A., & Mataix-Solera, J. (2014) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.07.005 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationSediment aggregation and water quality in wildfire-affected river basins.
Blake, W. H., Wallbrink, P. J., & Droppo, I. G. (2009) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf08068 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Abrantes, N., Pereira, R., Soares, A. M. V. M., & Gonçalves, F. (2008) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-008-9648-5 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Improved understanding of key elements governing the toxicity of energy ash eluates
Stiernström, S., Linde, M., Hemström, K., Wik, O., Ytreberg, E., Bengtsson, B. E., & Breitholtz, M. (2013) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.008 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Monitoring of methylated naphthalenes in sludge-derived pyrogenic carbonaceous materials
Frišták, V., Laughinghouse, H. D., Packová, A., Graser, M., & Soja, G. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.030 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pivello, V. R., Vieira, I. C. G., Christianini, A. V., Ribeiro, D. B., Menezes, L. D. S., Berlinck, C. N., Melo, F. P. L., Marengo, J. A., Tornquist, C. G., Tomás, W. M., et al. (2021) · Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.pecon.2021.06.005 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Meerhoff, M., Audet, J., Davidson, T. A., Meester, L. D., Hilt, S., Kosten, S., Liu, Z., Mazzeo, N., Paerl, H. W., Scheffer, M., et al. (2022) · Inland Waters · doi:10.1080/20442041.2022.2029317 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Karp, A. T., Holman, A. I., Hopper, P., Grice, K., & Freeman, K. H. (2020) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2020.08.024 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Fire and rain: A systematic review of the impacts of wildfire and associated runoff on aquatic fauna
Isaza, D. F. G., Cramp, R. L., & Franklin, C. E. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16088 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Sánchez-García, C., Santín, C., Neris, J., Sigmund, G., Otero, X. L., Manley, J., González-Rodríguez, G., Belcher, C. M., Cerdà, A., Marcotte, A. L., et al. (2023) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2023.108065 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationWildfire impacts on surface water quality parameters: Cause of data variability and reporting needs
Raoelison, O. D., Valenca, R., Lee, A., Karim, S., Webster, J. P., Poulin, B. A., & Mohanty, S. K. (2022) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120713 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Molecular insights and impacts of wildfire-induced soil chemical changes
Lopez, A. M., Avila, C. C. E., VanderRoest, J. P., Roth, H. K., Fendorf, S. E., & Borch, T. (2024) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-024-00548-8 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Rhoades, C. C., Nunes, J. P., Silins, U., & Doerr, S. H. (2019) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wfv28n10_fo · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citationFire-induced geochemical changes in soil: Implication for the element cycling
Roshan, A., & Biswas, A. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161714 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Campos, I., & Abrantes, N. (2021) · Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health · doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100293 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Fine Ash-Bearing Particles as a Major Aerosol Component in Biomass Burning Smoke
Adachi, K., Dibb, J. E., Scheuer, E., Katich, J. M., Schwarz, J. P., Perring, A. E., Mediavilla, B., Guo, H., Campuzano‐Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., et al. (2022) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2021jd035657 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Mortality events resulting from Australia's catastrophic fires threaten aquatic biota
Silva, L. G. M., Doyle, K. E., Duffy, D., Humphries, P., Horta, A., & Baumgartner, L. J. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15282 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Potentially Toxic Substances and Associated Risks in Soils Affected by Wildfires: A Review
Marcos, M. L. F. (2022) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics10010031 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Alam, M., Alshehri, T., Wang, J., Singerling, S. A., Alpers, C. N., & Baalousha, M. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130608 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Ensbey, M., Legge, S., Jolly, C. J., Garnett, S. T., Gallagher, R. V., Lintermans, M., Nimmo, D. G., Rumpff, L., Scheele, B. C., Whiterod, N. S., et al. (2023) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110021 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Wildfires under changing climate, and their environmental and health impacts
Bolan, S. S., Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Isaza, D. F. G., Rodgers, E. M., Zhou, P., Hou, D., Scordo, F., Chandra, S., Siddique, K. H. M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-025-04020-y · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Rao, J. N., & Parsai, T. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166682 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Villarruel, C. M., Figueroa, L. A., & Ranville, J. F. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c08446 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Richardson, C., Montalvo, M. S., Wagner, S., Barton, R., Paytan, A., Redmond, M., & Zimmer, M. A. (2024) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2023wr034940 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Past fires and post-fire impacts reconstructed from a southwest Australian stalagmite
McDonough, L. K., Treble, P. C., Baker, A., Borsato, A., Frisia, S., Nagra, G., Coleborn, K., Gagan, M. K., Zhao, J., & Paterson, D. J. (2022) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2022.03.020 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Atmospheric deposition of biologically relevant trace metals in the eastern Adriatic coastal area
Penezić, A., Milinković, A., Alempijević, S. B., Žužul, S., & Frka, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131178 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Jesus, F. T., Mesquita, A. F., Aldama, E. V., Marques, A., Gonçalves, A. M. M., Magalhães, L., Nogueira, A. J. A., Ré, A., Campos, I., Pereira, J. L., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20021326 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Rao, J. N., & Parsai, T. (2025) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125845 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Wildfire smoke impacts lake ecosystems
Farruggia, M. J., Brahney, J., Tanentzap, A. J., Brentrup, J. A., Brighenti, L. S., Chandra, S., Cortés, A., Fernandez, R., Fischer, J. M., Forrest, A. L., et al. (2024) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.17367 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Insect immunity in the Anthropocene
Khan, M. K., & Rolff, J. (2024) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.13158 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Hyman, I. T., Ahyong, S. T., Köhler, F., McEvey, S. F., Milledge, G. A., Reid, C. A. M., & Rowley, J. J. L. (2020) · Technical Reports of the Australian Museum online · doi:10.3853/j.1835-4211.32.2020.1768 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Yang, B., Shi, Y., Xu, S. N., Wang, Y., Kong, S., Cai, Z., & Wang, J. (2021) · Environmental Science Processes & Impacts · doi:10.1039/d1em00377a · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Muñiz González, A.-B., Campos, I., Re, A., Martínez-Guitarte, J.-L., & Abrantes, N. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159899 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Food for all? Wildfire ash fuels growth of diverse eukaryotic plankton
Ladd, T. M., Catlett, D., Maniscalco, M. A., Kim, S. M., Kelly, R. L., John, S. G., Carlson, C. A., & Iglesias-Rodriguez, M. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.1817 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Human risk assessment of ash soil after 2020 wildfires in Pantanal biome (Brazil)
Caumo, S., Lázaro, W. L., Sobreira Oliveira, E., Beringui, K., Gioda, A., Massone, C. G., Carreira, R., de Freitas, D. S., Ignacio, A. R. A., & Hacon, S. (2022) · Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health · doi:10.1007/s11869-022-01248-2 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
A Review of Speleothems as Archives for Paleofire Proxies, With Australian Case Studies
Campbell, M., McDonough, L. K., Treble, P. C., Baker, A., Kosarac, N., Coleborn, K., Wynn, P., & Schmitt, A. K. (2023) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2022rg000790 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Effects of burn severity on organic nitrogen and carbon chemistry in high-elevation forest soils
Roth, H. K., Mckenna, A. M., Simpson, M. J., Chen, H., Srikanthan, N., Fegel, T. S., Nelson, A. R., Rhoades, C. C., Wilkins, M. J., & Borch, T. (2023) · Soil & Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.seh.2023.100023 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Hrelja, I., Šestak, I., Delač, D., Pereira, P., & Bogunović, I. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12071515 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Cytotoxic effects of wildfire ashes: In-vitro responses of skin cells
Ré, A., Rocha, A. T., Campos, I., Keizer, J. J., Gonçalves, F. J. M., Oliveira, H., Pereira, J. L., & Abrantes, N. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117279 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Afonso, M., Coelho, L., Jesus, F. T., Campos, I., Abrantes, N., Gonçalves, F. J. M., Marques, S. M., & Serpa, D. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156677 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Coelho, L., Afonso, M., Jesus, F. T., Campos, I., Abrantes, N., Gonçalves, F. J. M., Serpa, D., & Marques, S. M. (2022) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120065 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Health burden of sugarcane burning on agricultural workers and nearby communities
Stem, A. D., Gibb, M., Roncal-Jiménez, C. A., Johnson, R. J., & Brown, J. M. (2024) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958378.2024.2316875 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Contaminant pulse following wildfire is associated with shifts in estuarine benthic communities
Bracewell, S. A., Barros, T. L., Mayer‐Pinto, M., Dafforn, K. A., Simpson, S. L., & Johnston, E. L. (2022) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120533 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Perruchini, E., Pinault, G.-J., & Sablier, M. (2022) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105503 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Kwan, G. T., Sanders, T. B., Huang, S., Kilaghbian, K., Sam, C., Wang, J., Weihrauch, K., Wilson, R. W., & Fangue, N. A. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176040 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Elements’ Content in Stream Sediment and Wildfire Ash of Suburban Areas in West Attica (Greece)
Doufexi, M., Gamvroula, D. E., & Alexakis, D. Ε. (2022) · Water · doi:10.3390/w14030310 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Fine particle pollution during megafires contains potentially toxic elements
Gill, R. L., Fleck, R., Chau, K., Westerhausen, M. T., Lockwood, T. E., Violi, J. P., Irga, P. J., Doblin, M. A., & Torpy, F. R. (2024) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123306 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Pelletier, N., Chételat, J., Sinon, S., & Vermaire, J. C. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153738 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Dong, W., Xu, M., Yang, X.-W., Xiu-mei, Y., Long, X., Han, X.-Y., Cui, L., & Tong, Q. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171651 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Downs, C. A., Doust, S. N., Haghshenas, S. A., Woodley, C. M., Shirzad, B., McDonald, E. M., Nazarpour, A., Farhangmehr, A., Zhao, H., Bishop, E. E., et al. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176346 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Isaacson, K. P., Verma, A., Whelton, A. J., Youngblood, J. P., & Shah, A. D. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137562 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Abrantes, N., Campos, I., Junior, C., Coelho, C., & Keizer, J. J. (2025) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138097 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Compound climate extreme events threaten migratory birds’ conservation in western U.S.
Irannezhad, M., Tahami, M. S., Ahmadi, B., Liu, J., & Chen, D. (2022) · Sustainable Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.horiz.2022.100023 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Wildfires mediate carbon transfer from land to lakes across boreal and temperate regions
Bélair, M., McCullough, I. M., Filstrup, C. T., Brentrup, J. A., & Lapierre, J. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02070-1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Wildfires in Alaskan Boreal Forests Release Elevated Levels of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon
Hasan, M. I., Sinha, N., Baghirzade, B. S., Karki, S., Arora, U., Kirisits, M. J., Aggarwal, S., Saleh, N. B., & Dev, S. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c09278 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Minos, T., Stamatakis, A., Golia, E. E., Adamantidou, C., Tziourrou, P., Spiliotopoulos, M. G., & Barbieri, E. (2026) · Land · doi:10.3390/land15010165 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Atmospheric deposition of mineral dust and associated nutrients over the Equatorial Indian Ocean
Panda, P. P., Shukla, G., Kumar, A., Aswini, M. A., Kaushik, A., Nayak, G., & Matta, V. M. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169779 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Effects of wildfire ash from native and alien plants on phytoplankton biomass
Netshituni, V. T., Cuthbert, R. N., Dondofema, F., & Dalu, T. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155265 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Bowden, M., Rosario‐Ortiz, F. L., & Mansfeldt, C. B. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c02148 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Effects of wildfire ash on the growth and biochemical profiles of the aquatic macrophyte Lemna minor
Mesquita, A. F., Abrantes, N., Campos, I., Nunes, C., Coimbra, M. A., Gonçalves, F. J. M., Marques, J. C., & Gonçalves, A. M. M. (2022) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2022.106245 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Fire, rain and runoff: addressing the overlooked impacts of wildfires on aquatic systems
Rodgers, E. M., Ferdousi, L., Hani, U.-E., Fritsch, O., & Gain, A. K. (2025) · Australasian Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1080/14486563.2025.2568323 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Fire-Induced Changes in Geochemical Elements of Forest Floor in Southern Siberia
Shapchenkova, O. A., Александровна, К. Е., & Groisman, P. (2024) · Fire · doi:10.3390/fire7070243 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Ashes in Freshwater Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of their Impacts on Fish
Kirsch, G., dos Anjos, A. G., Ruaro, R., Abrantes, N., & Figueiredo, B. R. S. (2024) · Water Air & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-024-07308-w · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Long, X., Xu, M., Dong, W., Xiu-mei, Y., Cui, L., & Tong, Q. (2024) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125470 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zeng, L., Mariano, S. M. F., Huang, R., Sánchez-García, C., Santín, C., Neris, J., Kumar, K. V., Glenn, C. K., Hajj, O. E., Anosike, A., et al. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c07101 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Pacaldo, R. S., Aydın, M., & Amarille, R. K. (2025) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2025.108801 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Fire on the ground: Wildfires impacts on soil health and biodiversity – A review
Sousa-Lima, L. V., Saggioro, E. M., Dorneles, P. R., & Parente, C. E. T. (2025) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144686 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Baetge, N., Halsey, K. H., Hanan, E. J., Behrenfeld, M. J., Milligan, A. J., Graff, J. R., Hansen, P., Carlson, C. A., Boiteau, R. M., Arrington, E. C., et al. (2025) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.1002/lno.70087 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wildfire ash inhibits the growth and photosynthetic efficiency of marine phytoplankton
Houtan, K. S. V., Lambert, J., Provatas, A. A., Houtan, D. J. V., & Smith, C. M. (2025) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.1002/lno.70161 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kirsch, G., Araujo, R. M. G., Melo, M. S., Nazari, E. M., & Figueiredo, B. R. S. (2025) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144756 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Rao, J. N., & Parsai, T. (2025) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-025-00719-y · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wang, C., Liang, Y., Yao, W., Bergendahl, J., & Liu, S. (2023) · Environmental science and engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-9822-5_250 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Tong, Q., Xu, M., Dong, W., Long, X., Han, X.-Y., & Cui, L. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177718 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Soranço, L. C., da Silva, C. J., de Freitas, D. S., Júnior, E. O. D. C., Eskinazi-Sant’Anna, E. M., Oliveira, E. S., Roland, F., Lobo, H., Nasário, J., Nunes, J. R. D. S., et al. (2025) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-025-35892-9 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Firewater toxicity after extinguishing natural-based insulation materials
Hybská, H., Osvaldová, L. M., Horvathová, M., Hýrošová, T., & Restás, Á. (2022) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.17.2.1988-2002 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gschwentner, D., Blehm, L., Brahney, J., Wedin, D. A., & Corman, J. R. (2025) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-025-01009-z · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Impacts of wildfire-related chemicals on surface drinking water sources: Status and research gaps
Rabago, R. D. L., Li, L. Y., & Tu, Q. (2026) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181472 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tong, Q., Xu, M., Fan, Q.-R., Pan, Y.-L., Long, X., Dong, W., Cui, L., & Luo, Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1598446 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The impact of the 2019–20 Australian wildfires on aquatic systems
Whiterod, N. S., Lintermans, M., Cramp, R. L., Franklin, C. E., Kennard, M. J., McCormack, R., Pearce, L., Raadik, T. A., Ward, M., & Zukowski, S. (2023) · CSIRO Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1071/9781486316656.bk08085_ch6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fire as an Earth System Process
de Dios, V. R. (2020) · Managing forest ecosystems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41192-3_3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Past fires and post-fire impacts reconstructed from a southwest Australian stalagmitePreprint
McDonough, L. K., Treble, P. C., Baker, A., Borsato, A., Frisia, S., Nagra, G., Coleborn, K., Gagan, M. K., Fakra, S. C., & Paterson, D. (2021) · doi:10.31223/x5jc86 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Alshehri, T., Jassim, A. Y., Cai, B., Richardson, T. L., & Baalousha, M. (2025) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano15060422 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Extreme wildfire conditions shift coastal phytoplankton community structure in California
Capone, D. A., Daniel, P., Kudela, R. M., Barton, A. D., Kahru, M., & Décima, M. R. (2025) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.1002/lno.70275 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Gorbach, N. M., Yakovleva, E. V., & Dymov, A. A. (2024) · Eurasian Soil Science · doi:10.1134/s1064229323603669 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Tong, Q., Pan, Y., Fan, Q., Dong, W., Long, X., Xu, M., Cui, L., & Luo, Z. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.71801 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Vasil'chuk, Y. K., Belik, A. D., Vasil'chuk, A. C., Budantseva, N. A., Vasil’chuk, J. Y., Ginzburg, A. P., & Bludushkina, L. B. (2020) · Арктика и Антарктика · doi:10.7256/2453-8922.2020.3.33583 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Fire and water: global fire impacts on physicochemical properties of freshwater ecosystemsPreprint
Morales, J. J., Paes, N. D. S., Silva, A. C. M., & Teixido, A. L. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1233463/v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Harper, A. R. (2020) · doi:10.23889/suthesis.56983 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationAsare, M. O., Midula, P., Oravová, L., Kuráň, P., & Hejcman, M. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-34858-7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nanoparticulate Wood Treatments Contribute to the Aquatic Toxicity of Simulated Urban Wildfire Ashes
Johnson, W., & Mansfeldt, C. B. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c05146 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hossain, M., & Talukder, T. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A · doi:10.1080/10934529.2025.2604445 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Araujo, R. M. G., Maciel, J. H. D. S., Miguel, L. G., Schimidt, B., Oscar, B. V. C., Matias, W. G., & Figueiredo, B. R. S. (2026) · Water Air & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-025-08926-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Peltzer, P. M., Boccioni, A. P. C., Simoniello, M. F., Attademo, A. M., Muchiutti, A. A., Santos, G. L. D. L., & Lajmanovích, R. C. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A · doi:10.1080/10934529.2025.2607913 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Thomas, J. L., Serena, M., Parrott, M. L., Bino, G., Hawke, T., Brunt, T., Hladyz, S., Connolly, J. H., Webb, B., Baring, R. J., et al. (2026) · Australian Mammalogy · doi:10.1071/am25035 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Skwaruk, J. S., Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., & Stone, M. (2020) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.13350785.v1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Pereira‐Silva, P. B., Pacheco, D. R., Kirsch, G., Araujo, R. M. G., Oscar, B. V. C., Matias, W. G., Santos, S., & Figueiredo, B. R. S. (2026) · Environmental Toxicology · doi:10.1002/tox.70178
Fire and water: contaminants and clearance following uncontrolled firesPreprint
Walsh, E., Stevenson, T., Terrett, R., Banwell, C. L., Sutherland, S., & Lal, A. (2021) · doi:10.31223/x53p7w
Skwaruk, J. S., Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., & Stone, M. (2020) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.13350785
Gorbach, N. M., Yakovleva, E. V., & Dymov, A. A. (2024) · Почвоведение · doi:10.31857/s0032180x24050084
Wildfire ash impacts to photosynthesis and growth of marine phytoplankton culturesPreprint
Houtan, K. S. V., Lambert, J., Provatas, A. A., Houtan, D. J. V., & Smith, C. M. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.10.632499
Cornelio, M. F. D., Ketterer, M. E., Jordan, J. A., Coplen, T. B., Celani, C. P., Carneiro, H. V., & Booksh, K. S. (2025) · Applied Spectroscopy · doi:10.1177/00037028251358899
Nault, N., Gazeau, F., Catala, P., Marie, B., Llort, J., Guieu, C., Bressac, M., Uher, E., Montanes, M., Pulido‐Villena, E., et al. (2026) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.70267
Anselmi, S., Pignattelli, S., Goljat, L., Fanti, M., Schlappa, K., & Renzi, M. (2026) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128239
- Authors
- Harper, A. R., Santin, C., Doerr, S. H., Froyd, C. A., Albini, D., Otero, X. L., Viñas, L., & Pérez-Fernández, B.
- Affiliations
- Swansea University (GB)
- ADepartment of Geography, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
- CDepartment of Edaphology and Agricultural Chemistry, Faculty of Biology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
- Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Harper, Ashleigh R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Wildland Fire
- Publisher
- CSIRO Publishing
- Published
- 2019-08-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 726-737
- ISSN
- 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-5516
- OpenAlex
- W2965875207
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Repositorio institucional da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (University of Santiago de Compostela) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust (RF‐2016‐456\2, 663830)
- European Commission (663830)
- Swansea University (663830)
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/R011125/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Keywords
- wildfire ash, Daphnia magna, aquatic toxicity, ash composition, eucalypt forest, chaparral, spruce forest, pine forest, heathland, grassland, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heavy metals, water-soluble metals, vegetation types
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review