Cited by 78dental development and anomaliesNF-κB Signaling PathwaysHair Growth and Disorders

Signaling and subcellular localization of the TNF receptor Edar.

Koppinen, P., Pispa, J., Laurikkala, J., Thesleff, I., Mikkola, M.L.·2001·Experimental Cell Research

Abstract

Tabby and downless mutant mice have identical phenotypes characterized by deficient development of several ectodermally derived organs such as teeth, hair, and sweat glands. Edar, encoded by the mouse downless gene and defective in human dominant and recessive forms of autosomal hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (EDA) syndrome, is a new member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily. The ligand of Edar is ectodysplasin, a TNF-like molecule mutated in the X-linked form of EDA and in the spontaneous mouse mutant Tabby. We have analyzed the response of Edar signaling in transfected cells and show that it activates nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) in a dose-dependent manner. When Edar was expressed at low levels, the NF-kappaB response was enhanced by coexpression of ectodysplasin. The activation of NF-kappaB was greatly reduced in cells expressing mutant forms of Edar associated with the downless phenotype. Overexpression of Edar did not activate SAPK/JNK nor p38 kinase. Even though Edar harbors a death domain its overexpression did not induce apoptosis in any of the four cell lines analyzed, nor was there any difference in apoptosis in developing teeth of wild-type and Tabby mice. Additionally, we show that the subcellular localization of dominant negative alleles of downless is dramatically different from that of recessive or wild-type alleles. This together with differences in NF-kappaB responses suggests an explanation for the different mode of inheritance o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/excr.2001.5331

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koppinen, P., Pispa, J., Laurikkala, J., Thesleff, I., & Mikkola, M. L.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Experimental Cell Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
269
Issue
2
Pages
180-192
ISSN
0014-4827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981937147
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
Keywords
EDAR, ectodysplasin, TNF receptor superfamily, hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia, NF-κB activation, subcellular localization, dominant-negative allele, mode of inheritance, tooth development, SAPK/JNK, p38 MAPK, death domain, apoptosis
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Brain, Crosses, Genetic, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enzyme Activation, Genes, Dominant, Genes, Recessive, Membrane Proteins, Mutation, Phenotype, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Time Factors, Tooth, Transfection, Signal Transduction, NF-kappa B, Apoptosis, In Situ Hybridization, Genes, Reporter, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Mice, Ectodysplasins, Receptors, Ectodysplasin, Edar Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review