The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamical Instabilities in Extrasolar Planetary Systems Containing Two Giant Planets
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Instabilities and strong dynamical interactions between several giant planets have been proposed as a possible explanation for the surprising orbital properties of extrasolar planetary systems. In particular, dynamical instabilities seem to provide a natural mechanism for producing the highly eccentric orbits seen in many systems. Here we present results from a new set of numerical integrations for the dynamical evolution of planetary systems containing two identical giant planets in nearly circular orbits very close to the dynamical stability limit. We determine the statistical properties of the three main types of systems resulting from the development of an instability: systems containing one planet, following either a collision between the two initial planets, or the ejection of one of them to infinity, and systems containing two planets in a new, quasi-stable configuration. We discuss the implications of our results for the formation and evolution of observed extrasolar planetary systems. We conclude that the distributions of eccentricities and semimajor axes for observed systems cannot be explained easily by invoking dynamical interactions between two planets initially on circular orbits. While highly eccentric orbits can be produced naturally by these interactions, collisions between the two planets, which occur frequently in the range of observed semimajor axes, would result in many more nearly circular orbits than in the observed sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi to its present location
Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380606a0 · Cited by 1,235
Orbital Evolution and Migration of Giant Planets: Modeling Extrasolar Planets
Trilling, D. E., Benz, W., Guillot, T., Lunine, J. I., Hubbard, W. B., & Burrows, A. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305711 · Cited by 329
Cited by
Statistical Properties of Exoplanets
Udry, S., & Santos, N. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110529 · Cited by 622
Astrophysics of Planet Formation
Armitage, P. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108344227 · Cited by 477
SECULAR CHAOS AND THE PRODUCTION OF HOT JUPITERS
Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/109 · Cited by 432
Perryman, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108304160 · Cited by 340
Gaudi, B. S., & Winn, J. N. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/509910 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Ford, E.
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 303-313
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986541298
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamical Instabilities in Extrasolar Planetary Systems Containing Two Giant Planets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/icar.2001.6588
- The paper
- Ford, E. (2001). Dynamical Instabilities in Extrasolar Planetary Systems Containing Two Giant Planets. Icarus. https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2001.6588
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.