The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are There Many Inactive Jupiter-Family Comets among the Near-Earth Asteroid Population?
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We analyze the dynamical evolution of Jupiter-family (JF) comets and near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) with aphelion distances Q >3.5 AU, paying special attention to the problem of mixing of both populations, such that inactive comets may be disguised as NEAs. From numerical integrations for 2×10 6 years we find that the half lifetime (where the lifetime is defined against hyperbolic ejection or collision with the Sun or the planets) of near-Earth JF comets (perihelion distances q 5 years but that they spend only a small fraction of this time (∼ a few 10 3 years) with q 6 years we find that the half lifetime of NEAs in “cometary” orbits (defined as those with aphelion distances Q >4.5 AU, i.e., that approach or cross Jupiter's orbit) is 4.2×10 5 years, i.e., about three times longer than that for near-Earth JF comets. We also analyze the problem of decoupling JF comets from Jupiter to produce Encke-type comets. To this end we simulate the dynamical evolution of the sample of observed JF comets with the inclusion of nongravitational forces. While decoupling occurs very seldom when a purely gravitational motion is considered, the action of nongravitational forces (as strong as or greater than those acting on Encke) can produce a few Enckes. Furthermore, a few JF comets are transferred to low-eccentricity orbits entirely within the main asteroid belt ( Q q >2 AU). The population of NEAs in cometary orbits is found to be adequately replenished with NEAs of smaller Q 's diffusing outward, from which we can set an upper limit of ∼20% for the putative component of deactivated JF comets needed to maintain such a population in steady state. From this analysis, the upper limit for the average time that a JF comet in near-Earth orbit can spend as a dormant, asteroid-looking body can be estimated to be about 40% of the time spent as an active comet. More likely, JF comets in near-Earth orbits will disintegrate once (or shortly after) they end their active phases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Population of Comets in the Main Asteroid Belt
Hsieh, H. H., & Jewitt, D. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1125150 · Cited by 503
Jewitt, D. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/3/66 · Cited by 318
“Numerical integrations show that these are not recently captured comets from the Kuiper Belt (Fernández et al. 2002; Levison et al. 2006).”
InfluentialThe dynamics of known centaurs
Tiscareno, M. S., & Malhotra, R. (2003) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/379554 · Cited by 176
An outer planet beyond Pluto and the origin of the trans-Neptunian belt architecture
Lykawka, P. S., & Mukai, T. (2008) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1161 · Cited by 121
Mottl, M. J., Glazer, B. T., Kaiser, R. I., & Meech, K. J. (2007) · Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2007.09.002 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernández, J. A., Gallardo, T., & Brunini, A.
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 358-368
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987149062
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are There Many Inactive Jupiter-Family Comets among the Near-Earth Asteroid Population? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/icar.2002.6903
- The paper
- Fernández, J. A., Gallardo, T., & Brunini, A. (2002). Are There Many Inactive Jupiter-Family Comets among the Near-Earth Asteroid Population? Icarus. https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2002.6903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.