The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tailoring GIS Software for Archaeological Applications: An Example Concerning Viewshed Analysis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A stochastic approach allows the veracity of any claimed visibility patterns or relationships to be statistically tested.
“This has the added value of allowing the veracity of any claimed visibility patterns or relationships to be statistically tested (e.g.Lake et al. 1998).”
From Mapping liminality: Critical frameworks for the GIS-based modelling of visibility (2017) · cites this paper as Lake et al. 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extending GIS-based visual analysis: the concept of visualscapes
Llobera, M. (2003) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/713811741 · Cited by 404
Howey, M. C. L. (2007) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.01.002 · Cited by 172
Visibility Studies in Archaeology: A Review and Case Study
Lake, M. W., & Woodman, P. E. (2003) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b29122 · Cited by 110
Self-citationMaking space for an archaeology of place
University of Southampton, & Wheatley, D. (2004) · Internet Archaeology · doi:10.11141/ia.15.10 · Cited by 88
Assessing the state of archaeological GIS research: Unbinding analyses of past landscapes
Howey, M. C. L., & Brouwer Burg, M. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.002 · Cited by 85
VISUAL AFFORDANCE, LANDSCAPE, AND THE MEGALITHS OF ALDERNEY
GILLINGS, M. (2009) · Oxford Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2009.00332.x · Cited by 79
Mapping invisibility: GIS approaches to the analysis of hiding and seclusion
Gillings, M. (2015) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2015.06.015 · Cited by 71
Modeling Métis mobility? Evaluating least cost paths and indigenous landscapes in the Canadian west
Supernant, K. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.006 · Cited by 64
Mapping liminality: Critical frameworks for the GIS-based modelling of visibility
Gillings, M. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.004 · Cited by 38
Intxaurbe, I., Arriolabengoa, M., Medina-Alcaide, M. Á., Rivero, O., Rios-Garaizar, J., Salazar, S., Líbano, I., & Garate, D. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105271 · Cited by 21
Pintura esquemática y territorios de la Prehistoria Reciente en la cuenca interior del Tajo
LANCHARRO GUTIÉRREZ, M. ª. Á., & BUENO RAMÍREZ, P. (2017) · Zephyrvs · doi:10.14201/zephyrus2017803347 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Lake, M. W., Woodman, P. E., & Mithen, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-38
- ISSN
- 0305-4403
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
