The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE
Simon, H. A. (1955) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884852 · Cited by 15,877
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,834
Newell, A. (1972) · Cited by 6,222
Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects.
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376 · Cited by 3,270
Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534 · Cited by 1,955
Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis
Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208899 · Cited by 1,943
Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects
Simonson, I. (1989) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209205 · Cited by 1,812
Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion
Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900301 · Cited by 1,725
BOUNDED RATIONALITY, AMBIGUITY, AND THE ENGINEERING OF CHOICE
March, J. G. (1988) · Decision Making · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598951.004 · Cited by 1,688
Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice
March, J. G. (1978) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003600 · Cited by 1,539
Cited by
The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice
Hensher, D. A., & Greene, W. H. (2003) · Transportation · doi:10.1023/a:1022558715350 · Cited by 2,047
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · Cited by 1,707
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
de Bekker‐Grob, E. W., Ryan, M., & Gerard, K. (2012) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1697 · Cited by 1,329
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
Clark, M. D., Determann, D., Petrou, S., Moro, D., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x · Cited by 851
Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care
(2008) · The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5753-3 · Cited by 765
Metadata
- Authors
- DeShazo, J. R., & Fermo, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-143
- ISSN
- 0095-0696 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049581452
- Cited by
- 732
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 42.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jeem.2001.1199
- The paper
- DeShazo, J. R., & Fermo, G. (2002). Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
