The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The UV visual world of fishes: a review
Abstract
Ultraviolet-A radiation (320–400 nm) is scattered rapidly in water. Despite this fact, UV is present in biologically useful amounts to at least 100 m deep in clear aquatic environments. Discovery of UV visual pigments with peak absorption at around 360 nm in teleost cone photoreceptors indicates that many teleost fishes may be adapted for vision in the UV range. Considering the characteristic absorption curve for visual pigments, about 18% of the downwelling light that illuminates objects at 30-m depth would be available to UV-sensitive cones. Strong scattering of UV radiation should produce unique imaging conditions as a very bright UV background in the horizontal view and a marked veiling effect that, with distance, obscures an image. Many teleosts have three, or even four, classes of cone cells mediating colour vision in their retina and one can be sensitive to UV. These UV-sensitive cones contain a visual pigment based on a unique opsin which is highly conserved between fish species. Several powerful methods exist for demonstration of UV vision, but all are rather demanding in terms of technique and equipment. Demonstration that the eye lacks UV-blocking compounds that are present in many fish eyes is a simpler method that can indicate the possibility of UV vision. The only experimental evidence for the use of UV vision by fishes is connected to planktivory: detection of UV-opaque objects at close range against a bright UV background is enhanced by the physical properties of UV light. Once present, perhaps for the function of detecting food, UV vision may well be co-opted through natural selection for other functions. Recent discovery that UV vision is critically important for mate choice in some birds and lizards is a strong object lesson for fish ecologists and behaviourists. Other possible functions amount to far more than merely adding a fourth dimension to the visible spectrum. Since UV is scattered so effectively in water, it may be useful for social signalling at short range and reduce the possibility of detection by other, illegitimate, receivers. Since humans are blind to UV light, we may be significantly in error, in many cases, in our attempts to understand and evaluate visual aspects of fish behaviour. A survey of the reflectance properties of skin pigments in fishes reveals a rich array of pigments with reflectance peaks in the UV. For example, the same yellow to our eyes may comprise two perceptually different colours to fish, yellow and UV-yellow. It is clearly necessary for us to anticipate that many fishes may have some form of UV vision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adaptive Coloration in Animals
Schmidt, K. P., & Cott, H. B. (1941) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1437762 · Cited by 1,318
LYTHGOE, J. N. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,161
Optimization, Constraint, and History in the Evolution of Eyes
Goldsmith, T. H. (1990) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/416840 · Cited by 632
The physics and biology of animal reflectors
Land, M. F. (1972) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0079-6107(72)90004-1 · Cited by 596
Adaptive Coloration in Animals
S., W. L., & Cott, H. B. (1940) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1788577 · Cited by 507
Endler, J. A. (1991) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91)90109-i · Cited by 478
Colour vision as an adaptation to frugivory in primates
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0089 · Cited by 423
Sexual Selection and the Mismeasure of Color
Bennett, A. T. D., Cuthill, I. C., & Norris, K. J. (1994) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285711 · Cited by 417
PENETRATION OF UV‐B AND BIOLOGICALLY EFFECTIVE DOSE‐RATES IN NATURAL WATERS*
Smith, R. C., & Baker, K. S. (1979) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1979.tb07054.x · Cited by 361
Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in starlings
Bennett, A. T. D., Cuthill, I. C., Partridge, J. C., & Lunau, K. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.16.8618 · Cited by 336
Cited by
Shick, J. M., & Dunlap, W. C. (2002) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.081501.155802 · Cited by 676
Odeen, A. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg108 · Cited by 330
Vision in the dimmest habitats on Earth
Warrant, E. (2004) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-004-0546-z · Cited by 318
African Cichlid Fishes: Model Systems for Evolutionary Biology
Kornfield, I., & Smith, P. F. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.163 · Cited by 295
Hidden in Plain Sight: The Ecology and Physiology of Organismal Transparency
Johnsen, S. (2001) · The Biological Bulletin · doi:10.2307/1543609 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Losey, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Fish Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 921-943
- ISSN
- 0022-1112 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165793490
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The UV visual world of fishes: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jfbi.1998.0919
- The paper
- Losey, G. (1999). The UV visual world of fishes: a review. Journal of Fish Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.1998.0919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.