Cited by 6,763Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen

Jones, Gareth, Willett, Peter, Glen, Robert C, Leach, Andrew R, Taylor, Robin·1997·Journal of Molecular Biology

DOI 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Prediction of small molecule binding modes to macromolecules of known three-dimensional structure is a problem of paramount importance in rational drug design (the "docking" problem). We report the development and validation of the program GOLD (Genetic Optimisation for Ligand Docking). GOLD is an automated ligand docking program that uses a genetic algorithm to explore the full range of ligand conformational flexibility with partial flexibility of the protein, and satisfies the fundamental requirement that the ligand must displace loosely bound water on binding. Numerous enhancements and modifications have been applied to the original technique resulting in a substantial increase in the reliability and the applicability of the algorithm. The advanced algorithm has been tested on a dataset of 100 complexes extracted from the Brookhaven Protein DataBank. When used to dock the ligand back into the binding site, GOLD achieved a 71% success rate in identifying the experimental binding mode.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0936 · Cited by 49,178
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,340
Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids
Hirschfelder, J. O., Curtiss, C. F., & Bird, R. B. (1955) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3061949 · Cited by 11,445
The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures
Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Meyer, E. F., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., & Tasumi, M. (1977) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3 · Cited by 8,574
Molecular theory of gases and liquids
Scott, R. L. (1955) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed032p232.2 · Cited by 3,958
Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics
Still, W. C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R. C., & Hendrickson, T. F. (1990) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00172a038 · Cited by 3,653
A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477 · Cited by 2,836
Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field
Clark, M., CRAMER, R. D. I., & Opdenbosch, N. V. (1989) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540100804 · Cited by 2,803
Analytical molecular surface calculation
Connolly, M. L. (1983) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889883010985 · Cited by 2,521
A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions
Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R., & Ferrin, T. E. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-x · Cited by 2,287

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 87 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Dreyer, 1992, Hydroxyethylene isostere inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus-I protease, Biochemistry, 31
Padlan, 1985, On the specificity of antibody 3-antigen interactions, Ann. Immunol. (Paris), C136, 271

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,019

Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5
Moustakas, D. T., Lang, P. T., Pegg, S. C. ‐., Pettersen, E. F., Kuntz, I. D., Brooijmans, N., & Rizzo, R. C. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-006-9060-4 · Cited by 448
A Common Reference Framework for Analyzing/Comparing Proteins and Ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands And Proteins (FLAP): Theory and Application
Baroni, M., Cruciani, G., Sciabola, S., Perruccio, F., & Mason, J. S. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci600253e · Cited by 451
An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein–Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking
Li, J., Fu, A., & Zhang, L. (2019) · Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-019-00327-w · Cited by 468
FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations
Claußen, H., Buning, C., Rarey, M., & Lengauer, T. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4551 · Cited by 431
COVID-19 Outbreak Prediction with Machine Learning
Ardabili, S., Mosavi, A. H., Ghamisi, P., Filip, F., Várkonyi-Kóczy, A. R., Reuter, U., Rabczuk, T., & Atkinson, P. M. (2020) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a13100249 · Cited by 427
α-Glucosidase inhibition by flavonoids: an in vitro and in silico structure–activity relationship study
Proença, C., Freitas, M., Ribeiro, D., Oliveira, E. F. T., Sousa, J. L. C., Tomé, S. M., Ramos, M. J., Silva, A. M. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Fernandes, E. (2017) · Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1080/14756366.2017.1368503 · Cited by 432
Fragment-Based Lead Discovery Using X-ray Crystallography
Hartshorn, M. J., Murray, C. W., Cleasby, A., Frederickson, M., Tickle, I. J., & Jhoti, H. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0495778 · Cited by 425
A new test set for validating predictions of protein–ligand interaction
Nissink, J. W. M., Murray, C. W., Hartshorn, M. J., Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., & Taylor, R. (2002) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10232 · Cited by 425
Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection—What can we learn from earlier mistakes?
Kirchmair, J., Markt, P., Distinto, S., Wolber, G., & Langer, T. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-007-9163-6 · Cited by 433
TarFisDock: a web server for identifying drug targets with docking approach
Li, H., Gao, Z., Kang, L., Zhang, H., Yang, K., Yu, K., Luo, X., Zhu, W., Chen, K., Shen, J., et al. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl114 · Cited by 426
Validation Studies of the Site-Directed Docking Program LibDock
Rao, S. N., Head, M. S., Kulkarni, A., & LaLonde, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci6004299 · Cited by 417
PoseBusters: AI-based docking methods fail to generate physically valid poses or generalise to novel sequences
Buttenschoen, M., Morris, G. M., & Deane, C. M. (2023) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d3sc04185a · Cited by 500
Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database
Plewczyński, D., Łaźniewski, M., Augustyniak, R., & Ginalski, K. (2010) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21643 · Cited by 423
Predicting Drug–Target Interaction Using a Novel Graph Neural Network with 3D Structure-Embedded Graph Representation
Lim, J., Ryu, S., Park, K., Choe, Y. J., Ham, J., & Kim, W. Y. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00387 · Cited by 411
Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods
Schneider, G., & Böhm, H. (2002) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(01)02091-8 · Cited by 404
Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening
Quiroga, R., & Villarreal, M. A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155183 · Cited by 428
Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions
Clark, R. D., Strizhev, A., Leonard, J. M., Blake, J. F., & Matthew, J. B. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1093-3263(01)00125-5 · Cited by 406
Lessons in Molecular Recognition: The Effects of Ligand and Protein Flexibility on Molecular Docking Accuracy
Erickson, J. A., Jalaie, M., Robertson, D. H., Lewis, R. A., & Vieth, M. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm030209y · Cited by 395
Machine-learning methods for ligand–protein molecular docking
Crampon, K., Giorkallos, A., Deldossi, M., Baud, S., & Steffenel, L. A. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.007 · Cited by 420
Antitumor Activity of ZSTK474, a New Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Inhibitor
Yaguchi, S., Fukui, Y., Koshimizu, I., Yoshimi, H., Matsuno, T., Gouda, H., Hirono, S., Yamazaki, K., & Yamori, T. (2006) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djj133 · Cited by 393
Molecular modeling in drug discovery
Adelusi, T. I., Oyedele, A.-Q. K., Boyenle, I. D., Ogunlana, A. T., Adeyemi, R. O., Divine, U. C., Idris, M. O., Olaoba, O. T., Adedotun, I. O., Oladipo, E. K., et al. (2022) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2022.100880 · Cited by 423
Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD.
Verdonk, M. L., Chessari, G., Cole, J. C., Hartshorn, M. J., Murray, C. W., Nissink, J. W. M., Taylor, R. D., & Taylor, R. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050543p · Cited by 393
Targeted rescue of a destabilized mutant of p53 by an in silico screened drug
Boeckler, F. M., Joerger, A. C., Jaggi, G., Rutherford, T. J., Veprintsev, D. B., & Fersht, A. R. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805326105 · Cited by 398
Application and Limitations of X‐ray Crystallographic Data in Structure‐Based Ligand and Drug Design
Davis, A. M., Teague, S. J., & Kleywegt, G. J. (2003) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200200539 · Cited by 386
Crystal Structures of a Multifunctional Triterpene/Flavonoid Glycosyltransferase from Medicago truncatula
Shao, H., He, X.-Z., Achnine, L., Blount, J. W., Dixon, R. A., & Wang, X. (2005) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.035055 · Cited by 387
Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results
Li, Y., Han, L., Liu, Z., & Wang, R. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500081m · Cited by 388
Virtual Screening Using Protein−Ligand Docking: Avoiding Artificial Enrichment
Verdonk, M. L., Berdini, V., Hartshorn, M. J., Mooij, W. T. M., Murray, C. W., Taylor, R. D., & Watson, P. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci034289q · Cited by 385
Flexible docking using tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity
Baxter, C. A., Murray, C. W., Clark, D. E., Westhead, D. R., & Eldridge, M. (1998) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19981115)33:3 · Cited by 378
Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum Cytochrome b That Are Associated with Atovaquone Resistance Are Located at a Putative Drug-Binding Site
Korsinczky, M. L. J., Chen, N., Kotecka, B. M., Saul, A. J., Rieckmann, K. H., & Cheng, Q. (2000) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.44.8.2100-2108.2000 · Cited by 374
Comparing protein–ligand docking programs is difficult
Cole, J. C., Murray, C. W., Nissink, J. W. M., Taylor, R. D., & Taylor, R. (2005) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20497 · Cited by 388
General and targeted statistical potentials for protein–ligand interactions
Mooij, W. T. M., & Verdonk, M. L. (2005) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20588 · Cited by 369
Performance of machine-learning scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
Wójcikowski, M., Ballester, P. J., & Siedlecki, P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46710 · Cited by 364
Autonomous Discovery in the Chemical Sciences Part I: Progress
Coley, C. W., Eyke, N. S., & Jensen, K. F. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201909987 · Cited by 371
Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking
Bursulaya, B. D., Totrov, M. M., Abagyan, R. A., & Brooks, C. L. (2003) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1023/b:jcam.0000017496.76572.6f · Cited by 368
Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening
Ain, Q. U., Aleksandrova, A., Roessler, F. D., & Ballester, P. J. (2015) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1225 · Cited by 357
Epigenetic modulation and understanding of HDAC inhibitors in cancer therapy
Ramaiah, M. J., Tangutur, A. D., & Manyam, R. R. (2021) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119504 · Cited by 365
Molecular dynamics-driven drug discovery: leaping forward with confidence
Ganesan, A., Coote, M. L., & Barakat, K. (2016) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.11.001 · Cited by 374
Structural basis for altered activity of M‐ and H‐isozyme forms of human lactate dehydrogenase
Read, J. A., Winter, V. J., Eszes, C. M., Sessions, R. B., & Brady, R. L. (2001) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/1097-0134(20010501)43:2 · Cited by 350
Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review
Yuriev, E., Agostino, M., & Ramsland, P. A. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.1077 · Cited by 360
A molecular modeling approach to identify effective antiviral phytochemicals against the main protease of SARS-CoV-2
Islam, R., Parves, M. R., Paul, A. S., Uddin, N., Rahman, M. S., Mamun, A. A., Hossain, M. N., Ali, M., & Halim, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2020.1761883 · Cited by 339
Empirical scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening: applications, critical aspects, and challenges
Guedes, I. A., Pereira, F. S. S., & Dardenne, L. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01089 · Cited by 331
An Alternative Method for the Evaluation of Docking Performance: RSR vs RMSD
Yusuf, D., Davis, A. M., Kleywegt, G. J., & Schmitt, S. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800084x · Cited by 353
Improving scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand scoring functions using random forest
Wang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24667 · Cited by 331
FitDock: protein–ligand docking by template fitting
Yang, X., Liu, Y., Gan, J., Xiao, Z. J., & Cao, Y. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac087 · Cited by 348
Reinvent 4: Modern AI–driven generative molecule design
Loeffler, H. H., He, J., Tibo, A., Janet, J. P., Voronov, A., Mervin, L., & Engkvist, O. (2024) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-024-00812-5 · Cited by 440
IsoStar: A library of information about nonbonded interactions
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Lommerse, J. P. M., Rowland, R. S., Taylor, R. S., & Verdonk, M. L. (1997) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1023/a:1007934413448 · Cited by 326
Novel Method for Generating Structure-Based Pharmacophores Using Energetic Analysis
Salam, N. K., Nuti, R., & Sherman, W. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900212v · Cited by 325
Rapid Context-Dependent Ligand Desolvation in Molecular Docking
Mysinger, M. M., & Shoichet, B. K. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100214a · Cited by 325
Oncogenic protein interfaces: small molecules, big challenges
Nero, T. L., Morton, C. J., Holien, J. K., Wielens, J., & Parker, M. W. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3690 · Cited by 312
Discovery of MD-224 as a First-in-Class, Highly Potent, and Efficacious Proteolysis Targeting Chimera Murine Double Minute 2 Degrader Capable of Achieving Complete and Durable Tumor Regression
Li, Y., Yang, J., Aguilar, A., McEachern, D., Przybranowski, S., Liu, L., Yang, C.-Y., Wang, M., Han, X., & Wang, S. (2019) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00909 · Cited by 312
How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment
Wang, R., & Wang, S. (2001) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci010025x · Cited by 317
Adenosine Kinase: Exploitation for Therapeutic Gain
Boison, D. (2013) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.112.006361 · Cited by 320
A consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein–ligand complexes: methods behind the HYDE scoring function
Schneider, N., Lange, G., Hindle, S. A., Klein, R., & Rarey, M. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-012-9626-2 · Cited by 320
Covalent inhibitors design and discovery.
De Cesco, S., Kurian, J., Dufresne, C., Mittermaier, A. K., & Moitessier, N. (2017) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.06.019 · Cited by 315
PMF Scoring Revisited
Muegge, I. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050038s · Cited by 317
Evaluation of the performance of four molecular docking programs on a diverse set of protein‐ligand complexes
Li, X., Li, Y., Cheng, T., Liu, Z., & Wang, R. (2010) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21498 · Cited by 304
Classification of Current Scoring Functions
Liu, J., & Wang, R. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500731a · Cited by 311
A new Lamarckian genetic algorithm for flexible ligand‐receptor docking
Fuhrmann, J., Rurainski, A., Lenhof, H., & Neumann, D. (2010) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21478 · Cited by 303
N-Fused Imidazoles As Novel Anticancer Agents That Inhibit Catalytic Activity of Topoisomerase IIα and Induce Apoptosis in G1/S Phase
Baviskar, A. T., Madaan, C., Preet, R., Mohapatra, P., Jain, V. K., Agarwal, A., Guchhait, S. K., Kundu, C. N., Banerjee, U. C., & Bharatam, P. V. (2011) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm200235u · Cited by 291
Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles
Lorber, D. M., & Shoichet, B. K. (1998) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560070411 · Cited by 294
Integrating Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Santos, L. H., Ferreira, R. S., & Caffarena, E. R. (2019) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9752-7_2 · Cited by 307
Protein‐based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of g‐protein coupled receptors suitable targets?
Bissantz, C., Bernard, P., Hibert, M., & Rognan, D. (2002) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10237 · Cited by 292
Computational Prediction of Metabolism: Sites, Products, SAR, P450 Enzyme Dynamics, and Mechanisms
Kirchmair, J., Williamson, M. J., Tyzack, J. D., Tan, L., Bond, P. J., Bender, A., & Glen, R. C. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200542m · Cited by 297
A Knowledge-Based Energy Function for Protein−Ligand, Protein−Protein, and Protein−DNA Complexes
Zhang, C., Liu, S., Zhu, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm049314d · Cited by 291
Low-Resolution Structures of Proteins in Solution Retrieved from X-Ray Scattering with a Genetic Algorithm
Chacón, P., Morán, F., Díaz, J. F., Pantos, E., & Andreu, J. M. (1998) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(98)77984-6 · Cited by 289
PLANTS: Application of Ant Colony Optimization to Structure-Based Drug Design
Korb, O., Stützle, T., & Exner, T. E. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11839088_22 · Cited by 305
Amodiaquine Clearance and Its Metabolism to N-Desethylamodiaquine Is Mediated by CYP2C8: A New High Affinity and Turnover Enzyme-Specific Probe Substrate
Li, X., Björkman, A., Andersson, T. B., Ridderström, M., & Masimirembwa, C. M. (2002) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.300.2.399 · Cited by 288
Docking Challenge: Protein Sampling and Molecular Docking Performance
Elokely, K. M., & Doerksen, R. J. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400040d · Cited by 304
Automated Docking Screens: A Feasibility Study
Irwin, J. J., Shoichet, B. K., Mysinger, M. M., Huang, N., Colizzi, F., Wassam, P., & Cao, Y. (2009) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm9006966 · Cited by 287
Structure-based discovery of β 2 -adrenergic receptor ligands
Kolb, P., Rosenbaum, D. M., Irwin, J. J., Fung, J. J., Kobilka, B. K., & Shoichet, B. K. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812657106 · Cited by 291
Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening
Chen, L., Cruz, A., Ramsey, S., Dickson, C. J., Duca, J. S., Horn̆ák, V., Koes, D. R., & Kurtzman, T. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220113 · Cited by 299
Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application
Spitzer, R., & Jain, A. N. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9533-y · Cited by 296
Discovery of QCA570 as an Exceptionally Potent and Efficacious Proteolysis Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Degrader of the Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Proteins Capable of Inducing Complete and Durable Tumor Regression
Qin, C., Hu, Y., Zhou, B., Fernandez-Salas, E., Yang, C.-Y., Liu, L., McEachern, D., Przybranowski, S., Wang, M., Stuckey, J., et al. (2018) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00506 · Cited by 281
A Potent and Orally Active Antagonist (SM-406/AT-406) of Multiple Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins (IAPs) in Clinical Development for Cancer Treatment
Cai, Q., Sun, H., Peng, Y., Lü, J., Nikolovska‐Coleska, Z., McEachern, D., Liu, L., Qiu, S., Yang, C., Miller, R. S., et al. (2011) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm101505d · Cited by 274
Cytochrome P450 6M2 from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae metabolizes pyrethroids: Sequential metabolism of deltamethrin revealed
Stevenson, B. J., Bibby, J., Pignatelli, P., Muangnoicharoen, S., O’Neill, P. M., Lian, L., Müller, P., Nikou, D. C., Steven, A., Hemingway, J., et al. (2011) · Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.02.003 · Cited by 272
Emerging Protein Targets for Anticancer Metallodrugs: Inhibition of Thioredoxin Reductase and Cathepsin B by Antitumor Ruthenium(II)−Arene Compounds
Casini, A., Gabbiani, C., Sorrentino, F., Rigobello, M. P., Bindoli, A., Geldbach, T. J., Marrone, A., Re, N., Hartinger, C. G., Dyson, P. J., et al. (2008) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm8006678 · Cited by 270
The Light and Dark Sides of Virtual Screening: What Is There to Know?
Gimeno, A., Ojeda, M. J., Tomas‐Hernández, S., Cereto‐Massagué, A., Beltrán‐Debón, R., Mulero, M., Pujadas, G., & García-Vallvé, S. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20061375 · Cited by 292
Highly Flexible Ligand Docking: Benchmarking of the DockThor Program on the LEADS-PEP Protein–Peptide Data Set
Santos, K. B., Guedes, I. A., Karl, A. L. M., & Dardenne, L. E. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00905 · Cited by 273
Three-Dimensional Models of Wild-Type and Mutated Forms of Cytochrome P450 14α-Sterol Demethylases from Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans Provide Insights into Posaconazole Binding
Li, X., Madison, V., Chau, A. S., Loebenberg, D., Palermo, R. E., & McNicholas, P. M. (2004) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.48.2.568-574.2004 · Cited by 269
DSX: A Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for the Assessment of Protein–Ligand Complexes
Neudert, G., & Klebe, G. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200274q · Cited by 272
Challenges, Applications, and Recent Advances of Protein-Ligand Docking in Structure-Based Drug Design
Grinter, S. Z., & Zou, X. (2014) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules190710150 · Cited by 271
Multi-Target-Directed Drug Design Strategy: From a Dual Binding Site Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor to a Trifunctional Compound against Alzheimer’s Disease
Bolognesi, M. L., Cavalli, A., Valgimigli, L., Bartolini, M., Rosini, M., Andrisano, V., Recanatini, M., & Melchiorre, C. (2007) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm701225u · Cited by 266
Structural and functional studies on a thermostable polyethylene terephthalate degrading hydrolase from Thermobifida fusca
Roth, C., Wei, R., Oeser, T., Then, J., Föllner, C., Zimmermann, W., & Sträter, N. (2014) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-014-5672-0 · Cited by 265
Salermide, a Sirtuin inhibitor with a strong cancer-specific proapoptotic effect
Lara, E., Mai, A., Calvanese, V., Altucci, L., López‐Nieva, P., Martínez‐Chantar, M. L., Varela‐Rey, M., Rotili, D., Nebbioso, A., Ropero, S., et al. (2008) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2008.436 · Cited by 267
Zebrafish chemical screening reveals an inhibitor of Dusp6 that expands cardiac cell lineages
Molina, G., Vogt, A., Bakan, A., Dai, W., de Oliveira, P. Q., Znosko, W. A., Smithgall, T. E., Bahar, İ., Lazo, J. S., Day, B. W., et al. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.190 · Cited by 262
NNScore: A Neural-Network-Based Scoring Function for the Characterization of Protein−Ligand Complexes
Durrant, J. D., & McCammon, J. A. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100244v · Cited by 261
Novel peptidomimetic inhibitors of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 dimerization and biological activity
Turkson, J., Kim, J. S., Zhang, S., Yuan, J., Huang, M., Glenn, M. P., Haura, E. B., Sebti, S. M., Hamilton, A. D., & Jove, R. (2004) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.261.3.3 · Cited by 258
A Guide to In Silico Drug Design
Chang, Y., Hawkins, B. A., Du, J. J., Groundwater, P. W., Hibbs, D. E., & Lai, F. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15010049 · Cited by 296
An artificial intelligence accelerated virtual screening platform for drug discovery
(2024) · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52061-7 · Cited by 259
Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Protein-Ligand Interactions by Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation: A Case of Oligopeptide Binding Protein
Fu, Y., Zhao, J., & Chen, Z. (2018) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2018/3502514 · Cited by 269
Merging Ligand-Based and Structure-Based Methods in Drug Discovery: An Overview of Combined Virtual Screening Approaches
Vázquez, J., López, M., Gibert, E., Herrero, E., & Luque, F. J. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25204723 · Cited by 270
CADD, AI and ML in drug discovery: A comprehensive review
Vemula, D., Jayasurya, P., Sushmitha, V., Kumar, Y. N., & Bhandari, V. (2022) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106324 · Cited by 275
Study on the binding of Thioflavin T to β-sheet-rich and non-β-sheet cavities
Groenning, M., Olsen, L., van de Weert, M., Flink, J. M., Frøkjær, S., & Jørgensen, F. S. (2007) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2006.12.010 · Cited by 259
Integrating virtual screening in lead discovery
Oprea, T. I., & Matter, H. (2004) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.06.008 · Cited by 251
Protein-Ligand Docking in the New Millennium – A Retrospective of 10 Years in the Field
Sousa, S. F., Ribeiro, A. J. M., Coimbra, J. T. S., Neves, R. P. P., Martins, S. A., Moorthy, N. S. H. N., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J. (2013) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867311320180002 · Cited by 258
eHiTS: A new fast, exhaustive flexible ligand docking system
Zsoldos, Z., Reid, D., Simon, A., Sadjad, S. B., & Johnson, A. P. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2006.06.002 · Cited by 254
From machine learning to deep learning: Advances in scoring functions for protein–ligand docking
Shen, C., Ding, J., Wang, Z., Cao, D., Ding, X., & Hou, T. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1429 · Cited by 255
Structure-based virtual screening of chemical libraries for drug discovery
Ghosh, S., Nie, A., An, J., & Huang, Z. (2006) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.04.002 · Cited by 253
An ant colony optimization approach to flexible protein–ligand docking
Korb, O., Stützle, T., & Exner, T. E. (2007) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-007-0006-9 · Cited by 259
Halogen-Enriched Fragment Libraries as Leads for Drug Rescue of Mutant p53
Wilcken, R., Liu, X., Zimmermann, M. O., Rutherford, T. J., Fersht, A. R., Joerger, A. C., & Boeckler, F. M. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja301056a · Cited by 243

Authors: Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R.
Affiliations: University of Sheffield (GB)
Wellcome Trust (GB)
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (GB)
Corresponding author: Jones, Gareth
ORCID: Jones, Gareth
Willett, Peter
Glen, Robert C
Leach, Andrew R
Taylor, Robin
Venue: Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1997-04
Volume: 267
Issue: 3
Pages: 727-748
ISSN: 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897
OpenAlex: W2050456292
Cited by: 6,763
References: 87
Citations by year: 2026: 244 · 2025: 332 · 2024: 356 · 2023: 361 · 2022: 383 · 2021: 414 · 2020: 394 · 2019: 351 · 2018: 327 · 2017: 270 · 2016: 248 · 2015: 234 · 2014: 237 · 2013: 248 · 2012: 274
Type: book review
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords: protein-ligand docking, genetic algorithm, flexible docking, protein-ligand complex, ligand conformational flexibility, rational drug design, binding mode prediction
MeSH terms: Algorithms, Binding Sites, Computer Simulation, Humans, Ligands, Models, Genetic, Models, Molecular, NADP, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase, Crystallography, X-Ray

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks