The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen
Abstract
Prediction of small molecule binding modes to macromolecules of known three-dimensional structure is a problem of paramount importance in rational drug design (the "docking" problem). We report the development and validation of the program GOLD (Genetic Optimisation for Ligand Docking). GOLD is an automated ligand docking program that uses a genetic algorithm to explore the full range of ligand conformational flexibility with partial flexibility of the protein, and satisfies the fundamental requirement that the ligand must displace loosely bound water on binding. Numerous enhancements and modifications have been applied to the original technique resulting in a substantial increase in the reliability and the applicability of the algorithm. The advanced algorithm has been tested on a dataset of 100 complexes extracted from the Brookhaven Protein DataBank. When used to dock the ligand back into the binding site, GOLD achieved a 71% success rate in identifying the experimental binding mode.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“GOLD (Jones et al., 1997), Autodock4 (Bianco et al., 2016), CovalentDock (Ouyang et al., 2013), CovDock (Zhu et al., 2014), DOCKovalent (London et al., 2014), and DOCK-TITE (Scholz et al., 2015) are some examples of docking programs that developed specific methodologies to deal with covalent-docking.”
From Empirical scoring functions for structure-based virtual screening: applications, critical aspects, and challenges (2018) · cites this paper as Jones et al., 1997
Citations
Cites
Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0936 · Cited by 49,178
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,340
Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids
Hirschfelder, J. O., Curtiss, C. F., & Bird, R. B. (1955) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3061949 · Cited by 11,445
The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures
Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Meyer, E. F., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., & Tasumi, M. (1977) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3 · Cited by 8,574
Molecular theory of gases and liquids
Scott, R. L. (1955) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed032p232.2 · Cited by 3,958
Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics
Still, W. C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R. C., & Hendrickson, T. F. (1990) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00172a038 · Cited by 3,653
A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477 · Cited by 2,836
Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field
Clark, M., CRAMER, R. D. I., & Opdenbosch, N. V. (1989) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540100804 · Cited by 2,803
Analytical molecular surface calculation
Connolly, M. L. (1983) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889883010985 · Cited by 2,521
A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions
Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R., & Ferrin, T. E. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-x · Cited by 2,287
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dreyer, 1992, Hydroxyethylene isostere inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus-I protease, Biochemistry, 31
- Padlan, 1985, On the specificity of antibody 3-antigen interactions, Ann. Immunol. (Paris), C136, 271
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,019 of 1,019
GFscore: a general nonlinear consensus scoring function for high-throughput docking.
Betzi, S., Suhre, K., Chétrit, B., Guerlesquin, F., & Morelli, X. (2006) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci0600758 · Cited by 51
PDE6D Inhibitors with a New Design Principle Selectively Block K-Ras Activity
Siddiqui, F. A., Alam, C., Rosenqvist, P., Ora, M., Sabt, A., Manoharan, G. B., Bindu, L., Okutachi, S., Catillon, M., Taylor, T., et al. (2020) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b03639 · Cited by 46
Serrao, E., Xu, Z.-L., Debnath, B., Christ, F., Debyser, Z., Long, Y.-Q., & Neamati, N. (2013) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2013.07.047 · Cited by 47
Customized versus universal scoring functions
Logean, A., Sette, A., & Rognan, D. (2001) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00021-x · Cited by 46
On-the-fly QM/MM docking with attracting cavities.
Chaskar, P., Zoete, V., & Röhrig, U. F. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00406 · Cited by 46
Ding, B., Wang, J., Li, N., & Wang, W. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300508m · Cited by 45
Vicente-Zurdo, D., Rosales-Conrado, N., León-González, M. E., Brunetti, L., Piemontese, L., Pereira-Santos, A. R., Cardoso, S. M., Madrid, Y., Chaves, S., & Santos, M. A. (2022) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines10071510 · Cited by 47
Ranking power of the SQM/COSMO scoring function on carbonic anhydrase II-inhibitor complexes.
Pecina, A., Brynda, J., Vrzal, L., Gnanasekaran, R., Hořejší, M., Eyrilmez, S. M., Řezáč, J., Lepšík, M., Řezáčová, P., Hobza, P., et al. (2018) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201701104 · Cited by 36
Morgan, R. A., Beck, K. R., Nixon, M., Homer, N. Z. M., Crawford, A. A., Melchers, D., Houtman, R., Meijer, O. C., Stomby, A., Anderson, A. J., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10410-1 · Cited by 31
Itraconazole Reverts ABCB1-Mediated Docetaxel Resistance in Prostate Cancer
Lima, T. S., Souza, L. O., Iglesias-Gato, D., Elversang, J., Jørgensen, F. S., Kallunki, T., Røder, M. A., Brasso, K., & Moreira, J. M. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.869461 · Cited by 26
Lee, S., Warthaka, M., Yan, C., Kaoud, T. S., Piserchio, A., Ghose, R., Ren, P., & Dalby, K. N. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018594 · Cited by 26
A quantum mechanics-based halogen bonding scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.
Yang, Z., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Xu, Z., Shi, J., Chen, K., & Zhu, W. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-015-2681-6 · Cited by 23
Kaserer, T., Temml, V., Kutil, Z., Vanek, T., Landa, P., & Schuster, D. (2015) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.017 · Cited by 23
Cescon, E., Bolcato, G., Federico, S., Bissaro, M., Valentini, A., Ferlin, M. G., Spalluto, G., Sturlese, M., & Moro, S. (2020) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00028 · Cited by 19
De Luca, L., Morreale, F., Christ, F., Debyser, Z., Ferro, S., & Gitto, R. (2013) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.07.025 · Cited by 17
Carotenuto, L., Keminer, O., Carleo, G., Zaliani, A., Leo, A., Citraro, R., De Sarro, G., Dirkx, N., Kaji, M., Weckhuysen, S., et al. (2025) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.70119 · Cited by 10
“Data analysis was performed among saved poses using CHEMPLP scoring function (Jones et al., 1997).”
InfluentialGao, Y.-D., Hu, Y., Crespo, A., Wang, D., Armacost, K. A., Fells, J. I., Fradera, X., Wang, H., Wang, H., Sherborne, B., et al. (2018) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-017-0072-z · Cited by 9
The Basis for Target‐Based Virtual Screening: Protein Structures
Cole, J. C., Korb, O., Olsson, T. S. G., & Liebeschuetz, J. (2011) · Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527633326.ch4 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Wellcome Trust (GB)
- Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Gareth
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 727-748
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050456292
- Cited by
- 6,763
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 244 · 2025: 332 · 2024: 356 · 2023: 361 · 2022: 383 · 2021: 414 · 2020: 394 · 2019: 351 · 2018: 327 · 2017: 270 · 2016: 248 · 2015: 234 · 2014: 237 · 2013: 248 · 2012: 274
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
- Keywords
- protein-ligand docking, genetic algorithm, flexible docking, protein-ligand complex, ligand conformational flexibility, rational drug design, binding mode prediction
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Binding Sites, Computer Simulation, Humans, Ligands, Models, Genetic, Models, Molecular, NADP, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase, Crystallography, X-Ray
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
