Cited by 6,763Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen

Jones, Gareth, Willett, Peter, Glen, Robert C, Leach, Andrew R, Taylor, Robin·1997·Journal of Molecular Biology

DOI 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Prediction of small molecule binding modes to macromolecules of known three-dimensional structure is a problem of paramount importance in rational drug design (the "docking" problem). We report the development and validation of the program GOLD (Genetic Optimisation for Ligand Docking). GOLD is an automated ligand docking program that uses a genetic algorithm to explore the full range of ligand conformational flexibility with partial flexibility of the protein, and satisfies the fundamental requirement that the ligand must displace loosely bound water on binding. Numerous enhancements and modifications have been applied to the original technique resulting in a substantial increase in the reliability and the applicability of the algorithm. The advanced algorithm has been tested on a dataset of 100 complexes extracted from the Brookhaven Protein DataBank. When used to dock the ligand back into the binding site, GOLD achieved a 71% success rate in identifying the experimental binding mode.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0936 · Cited by 49,178
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,340
Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids
Hirschfelder, J. O., Curtiss, C. F., & Bird, R. B. (1955) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3061949 · Cited by 11,445
The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures
Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Meyer, E. F., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., & Tasumi, M. (1977) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3 · Cited by 8,574
Molecular theory of gases and liquids
Scott, R. L. (1955) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed032p232.2 · Cited by 3,958
Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics
Still, W. C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R. C., & Hendrickson, T. F. (1990) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00172a038 · Cited by 3,653
A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477 · Cited by 2,836
Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field
Clark, M., CRAMER, R. D. I., & Opdenbosch, N. V. (1989) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540100804 · Cited by 2,803
Analytical molecular surface calculation
Connolly, M. L. (1983) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889883010985 · Cited by 2,521
A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions
Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R., & Ferrin, T. E. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-x · Cited by 2,287

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 87 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Dreyer, 1992, Hydroxyethylene isostere inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus-I protease, Biochemistry, 31
Padlan, 1985, On the specificity of antibody 3-antigen interactions, Ann. Immunol. (Paris), C136, 271

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,019

F lex S: A Method for Fast Flexible Ligand Superposition
Lemmen, C., Lengauer, T., & Klebe, G. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm981037l · Cited by 243
Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening.
Yang, J.-M., Chen, Y.-F., Shen, T.-W., Kristal, B. S., & Hsu, D. F. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci050034w · Cited by 241
Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand-protein complexes
Verkhivker, G. M., Bouzida, D., Gehlhaar, D. K., Rejto, P. A., Arthurs, S., Colson, A. B., Freer, S. T., Larson, V., Luty, B. A., Marrone, T. J., et al. (2000) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1023/a:1008158231558 · Cited by 248
Antitumor activity of an allosteric inhibitor of centromere-associated protein-E
Wood, K. W., Lad, L., Luo, L., Qian, X., Knight, S. D., Nevins, N., Brejc, K., Sutton, D., Gilmartin, A. G., Chua, P. R., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0915068107 · Cited by 235
Matrix metalloproteinases and collagen catabolism
Lauer‐Fields, J. L., Juska, D., & Fields, G. B. (2002) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.10201 · Cited by 239
A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.
Wei, B. Q., Baase, W. A., Weaver, L. H., Matthews, B. W., & Shoichet, B. K. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00777-5 · Cited by 237
Structure-based Drug Discovery Using GPCR Homology Modeling: Successful Virtual Screening for Antagonists of the Alpha1A Adrenergic Receptor
Evers, A., & Klabunde, T. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0491804 · Cited by 234
Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications
B‐Rao, C., Subramanian, J., & Sharma, S. (2009) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2009.01.003 · Cited by 239
Structure-Based Discovery of SD-36 as a Potent, Selective, and Efficacious PROTAC Degrader of STAT3 Protein
Zhou, H., Bai, L., Xu, R., Zhao, Y., Chen, J., McEachern, D., Chinnaswamy, K., Wen, B., Dai, L., Kumar, P., et al. (2019) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01530 · Cited by 233
Structure-Based Discovery of A 2A Adenosine Receptor Ligands
Carlsson, J., Yoo, L. S., Gao, Z.-G., Irwin, J. J., Shoichet, B. K., & Jacobson, K. A. (2010) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm100240h · Cited by 233
Identification of 1,5-Naphthyridine Derivatives as a Novel Series of Potent and Selective TGF-β Type I Receptor Inhibitors
Gellibert, F. J., Woolven, J. M., Fouchet, M.-H., Mathews, N., Goodland, H., Lovegrove, V. L. H., Laroze, A., Nguyen, V.-L., Sautet, S., Wang, R., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0400247 · Cited by 226
Mechanism of anchoring of OmpA protein to the cell wall peptidoglycan of the gram‐negative bacterial outer membrane
Park, J. S., Lee, W. C., Yeo, K. J., Ryu, K., Kumarasiri, M., Hesek, D., Lee, M., Mobashery, S., Song, J. H., Kim, S. I., et al. (2011) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.11-188425 · Cited by 226
On Evaluating Molecular-Docking Methods for Pose Prediction and Enrichment Factors
Chen, H., Lyne, P. D., Giordanetto, F., Lovell, T., & Li, J. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci0503255 · Cited by 227
Lead Finder: An Approach To Improve Accuracy of Protein−Ligand Docking, Binding Energy Estimation, and Virtual Screening
Stroganov, O. V., Novikov, F. N., Stroylov, V. S., Kulkov, V., & Chilov, G. G. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800166p · Cited by 228
Virtual Screening for HIV Protease Inhibitors: A Comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina
Chang, M. W., Ayeni, C., Breuer, S., & Torbett, B. E. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011955 · Cited by 230
Specific inhibitors of the protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 identified by high-throughput docking
Hellmuth, K., Grosskopf, S., Lum, C. T., Würtele, M., Röder, N., von Kries, J. P., Rosário, M., Rademann, J., & Birchmeier, W. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710468105 · Cited by 223
An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein−Ligand Complexes
Wang, R., Lu, Y., Fang, X., & Wang, S. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci049733j · Cited by 228
Docking and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery
Kontoyianni, M. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7201-2_18 · Cited by 234
The Structure and Regulation of Human Muscle α-Actinin
Ribeiro, E. A., Pinotsis, N., Ghisleni, A., Salmazo, A., Konarev, P. V., Košťan, J., Sjöblom, B., Schreiner, C., Polyansky, A. A., Gkougkoulia, E. A., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.056 · Cited by 229
AGL-Score: Algebraic Graph Learning Score for Protein–Ligand Binding Scoring, Ranking, Docking, and Screening
Nguyen, D. D., & Wei, G. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00334 · Cited by 224
MM-GB/SA Rescoring of Docking Poses in Structure-Based Lead Optimization
Guimarães, C. R. W., & Cardozo, M. G. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800004w · Cited by 222
Molecular docking studies for the identification of novel melatoninergic inhibitors for acetylserotonin-O-methyltransferase using different docking routines
Azam, S. S., & Abbasi, S. W. (2013) · Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling · doi:10.1186/1742-4682-10-63 · Cited by 221
Multi-target-directed coumarin derivatives: hAChE and BACE1 inhibitors as potential anti-Alzheimer compounds
Piazzi, L., Cavalli, A., Colizzi, F., Belluti, F., Bartolini, M., Mancini, F., Recanatini, M., Andrisano, V., & Rampa, A. (2007) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.09.100 · Cited by 215
Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools
Schulz‐Gasch, T., & Ståhl, M. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-002-0112-y · Cited by 213
Discovery of 4-((3′ R ,4′ S ,5′ R )-6″-Chloro-4′-(3-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)-1′-ethyl-2″-oxodispiro[cyclohexane-1,2′-pyrrolidine-3′,3″-indoline]-5′-carboxamido)bicyclo[2.2.2]octane-1-carboxylic Acid (AA-115/APG-115): A Potent and Orally Active Murine Double Minute 2 (MDM2) Inhibitor in Clinical Development
Aguilar, A., Lu, J., Liu, L., Du, D., Bernard, D., McEachern, D., Przybranowski, S., Li, X., Luo, R., Wen, B., et al. (2017) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01665 · Cited by 211
A Small-Molecule Dengue Virus Entry Inhibitor
Wang, Q., Patel, S. J., Vangrevelinghe, E., Xu, H. Y., Rao, R., Jaber, D. M., Schul, W., Gu, F., Heudi, O., Ma, N. L., et al. (2009) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01148-08 · Cited by 211
Reliable and Accurate Solution to the Induced Fit Docking Problem for Protein–Ligand Binding
Miller, E. B., Murphy, R. B., Sindhikara, D., Borrelli, K. W., Grisewood, M. J., Ranalli, F., Dixon, S. L., Jerome, S., Boyles, N. A., Day, T., et al. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00136 · Cited by 210
Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of a Potent, Nonpeptide, Cell-Permeable, Bivalent Smac Mimetic That Concurrently Targets Both the BIR2 and BIR3 Domains in XIAP
Sun, H., Nikolovska‐Coleska, Z., Lü, J., Meagher, J. L., Yang, C., Qiu, S., Tomita, Y. A., Ueda, Y., Jiang, S., Krajewski, K., et al. (2007) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja074725f · Cited by 211
Relevance of Molecular Docking Studies in Drug Designing
Jakhar, R., Dangi, M., Khichi, A., & Chhillar, A. K. (2019) · Current Bioinformatics · doi:10.2174/1574893615666191219094216 · Cited by 218
EADock: Docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization
Grosdidier, A., Zoete, V., & Michielin, O. A. (2007) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21367 · Cited by 208
Comparison of Automated Docking Programs as Virtual Screening Tools
Cummings, M. D., DesJarlais, R. L., Gibbs, A. C., Mohan, V., & Jaeger, E. P. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm049798d · Cited by 212
Docking: Successes and Challenges
Mohan, V., Gibbs, A., Cummings, M. D., Jaeger, E. P., & DesJarlais, R. L. (2005) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612053382106 · Cited by 216
Structure and Ligand Based Drug Design Strategies in the Development of Novel 5- LOX Inhibitors
Aparoy, P., Reddy, K. K., & Reddanna, P. (2012) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986712801661112 · Cited by 207
Benchmarking of different molecular docking methods for protein-peptide docking
Singh, S., Srivastava, H. K., Kishor, G., Singh, S., Agrawal, P., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2449-y · Cited by 212
DOCKTITE—A Highly Versatile Step-by-Step Workflow for Covalent Docking and Virtual Screening in the Molecular Operating Environment
Scholz, C., Knorr, S., Hamacher, K., & Schmidt, B. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500681r · Cited by 209
Pyrones as bacterial signaling molecules.
Brachmann, A., Brameyer, S., Kresovic, D., Hitkova, I., Kopp, Y., Manske, C., Schubert, K., Bode, H., & Heermann, R. (2013) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1295 · Cited by 185
Novel donepezil-based inhibitors of acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterase and acetylcholinesterase-induced beta-amyloid aggregation.
Camps, P., Formosa, X., Galdeano, C., Gómez, T., Muñoz-Torrero, D., Scarpellini, M., Viayna, E., Badía, A., Clos, M. V., Camins, A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm8001313 · Cited by 194
Discovery and Optimization of Materials Using Evolutionary Approaches
Le, T. C., & Winkler, D. A. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00691 · Cited by 204
MedusaScore: An Accurate Force Field-Based Scoring Function for Virtual Drug Screening
Yin, S., Biedermannová, L., Vondrášek, J., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci8001167 · Cited by 212
Crystal structure of yeast acetohydroxyacid synthase: a target for herbicidal inhibitors
Pang, S. S., Duggleby, R. G., & Guddat, L. W. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.5419 · Cited by 203
An Updated Review of Computer‐Aided Drug Design and Its Application to COVID‐19
Gurung, A. B., Ali, M. A., Lee, J., Farah, M. A., & Al‐Anazi, K. M. (2021) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2021/8853056 · Cited by 221
Evaluation and optimization of virtual screening workflows with DEKOIS 2.0 – A public library of challenging docking benchmark sets.
Bauer, M. R., Ibrahim, T. M., Vogel, S. M., & Boeckler, F. M. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400115b · Cited by 200
Discovery and Characterization of a Small Molecule Inhibitor of the PDZ Domain of Dishevelled
Grandy, D. K., Shan, J., Zhang, X., Rao, S., Akunuru, S., Li, H., Zhang, Y. H., Alpatov, I. V., Zhang, X. A., Lang, R. A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.009647 · Cited by 209
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 7A1 (ALDH7A1) Is a Novel Enzyme Involved in Cellular Defense against Hyperosmotic Stress
Brocker, C. N., Lassen, N., Estey, T., Pappa, A., Cantore, M., Orlova, V. V., Chavakis, T., Kavanagh, K. L., Oppermann, U. C. T., & Vasiliou, V. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.077925 · Cited by 200
Dynamic Docking: A Paradigm Shift in Computational Drug Discovery
Gioia, D., Bertazzo, M., Recanatini, M., Masetti, M., & Cavalli, A. (2017) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules22112029 · Cited by 205
SuperStar: A Knowledge-based Approach for Identifying Interaction Sites in Proteins
Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., & Taylor, R. S. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2809 · Cited by 198
Community detection based on modularity and an improved genetic algorithm
Shang, R., Bai, J., Jiao, L., & Jin, C. (2012) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2012.11.003 · Cited by 196
Evaluations of Molecular Docking Programs for Virtual Screening
Onodera, K., Satou, K., & Hirota, H. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci7000378 · Cited by 198
Probing the binding site of curcumin in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis FtsZ – A structural insight to unveil antibacterial activity of curcumin
Kaur, S., Modi, N. H., Panda, D., & Roy, N. (2010) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.06.015 · Cited by 195
Structure–Activity Studies on Suramin Analogues as Inhibitors of NAD+‐Dependent Histone Deacetylases (Sirtuins)
Trapp, J., Meier, R., Hongwiset, D., Kassack, M. U., Sippl, W., & Jung, M. (2007) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.200700003 · Cited by 198
The cAMP Receptor-Like Protein CLP Is a Novel c-di-GMP Receptor Linking Cell–Cell Signaling to Virulence Gene Expression in Xanthomonas campestris
Chin, K., Lee, Y.-C., Tu, Z., Chen, C.-H., Tseng, Y., Yang, J., Ryan, R. P., McCarthy, Y., Dow, J. M., Wang, A. H. ‐., et al. (2009) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.076 · Cited by 195
Crystal Structure of Medicago truncatula UGT85H2 – Insights into the Structural Basis of a Multifunctional (Iso)flavonoid Glycosyltransferase
Li, L., Modolo, L. V., Escamilla‐Treviño, L. L., Achnine, L., Dixon, R. A., & Wang, X. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.036 · Cited by 195
How To Optimize Shape-Based Virtual Screening: Choosing the Right Query and Including Chemical Information
Kirchmair, J., Distinto, S., Markt, P., Schuster, D., Spitzer, G. M., Liedl, K. R., & Wolber, G. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci8004226 · Cited by 196
Rigorous Free Energy Simulations in Virtual Screening
Cournia, Z., Allen, B. K., Beuming, T., Pearlman, D. A., Radak, B. K., & Sherman, W. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00116 · Cited by 202
PIGNet: a physics-informed deep learning model toward generalized drug–target interaction predictions
Moon, S., Zhung, W., Yang, S., Lim, J., & Kim, W. Y. (2022) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d1sc06946b · Cited by 198
Structural basis for the cooperative allosteric activation of the free fatty acid receptor GPR40
Lu, J., Byrne, N. J., Wang, J. C. K., Bricogne, G., Brown, F. K., Chobanian, H. R., Colletti, S. L., Salvo, J. D., Thomas-Fowlkes, B. S., Guo, Y., et al. (2017) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3417 · Cited by 187
A dynamic niching genetic algorithm strategy for docking highly flexible ligands
de Magalhães, C. S., Almeida, D. M., Barbosa, H. J. C., & Dardenne, L. E. (2014) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.002 · Cited by 199
Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target?
Ramírez, D., & Caballero, J. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17040525 · Cited by 200
High-Performance Drug Discovery: Computational Screening by Combining Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Okimoto, N., Futatsugi, N., Fuji, H., Suenaga, A., Morimoto, G., Yanai, R., Ohno, Y., Narumi, T., & Taiji, M. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000528 · Cited by 194
Recent Development and Application of Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery: An Overview
Hou, T., & Xu, X. (2004) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612043452721 · Cited by 187
Cambridge Structural Database
Allen, F. H., & Hoy, V. J. (1998) · Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/0470845015.cca059s · Cited by 189
An Oxazole-Based Small-Molecule Stat3 Inhibitor Modulates Stat3 Stability and Processing and Induces Antitumor Cell Effects
Siddiquee, K., Gunning, P. T., Glenn, M. P., Katt, W. P., Zhang, S., Schrock, C. E., Sebti, S. M., Jove, R., Hamilton, A. D., & Turkson, J. (2007) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/cb7001973 · Cited by 188
Functional characterization and structural modeling of synthetic polyester-degrading hydrolases from Thermomonospora curvata
Wei, R., Oeser, T., Then, J., Kühn, N., Barth, M., Schmidt, J., & Zimmermann, W. (2014) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/s13568-014-0044-9 · Cited by 193
New Tricks for an Old Natural Product: Discovery of Highly Potent Evodiamine Derivatives as Novel Antitumor Agents by Systemic Structure–Activity Relationship Analysis and Biological Evaluations
Dong, G., Wang, S., Miao, Z., Yao, J., Zhang, Y., Guo, Z., Zhang, W., & Sheng, C. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300605m · Cited by 189
Constrained geometric simulation of diffusive motion in proteins
Wells, S. A., Menor, S., Hespenheide, B. M., & Thorpe, M. F. (2005) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/2/4/s07 · Cited by 187
Identification of a new JNK inhibitor targeting the JNK-JIP interaction site
Stebbins, J. L., De, S. K., Machleidt, T., Becattini, B., Vazquez, J., Kuntzen, C., Chen, L.-H., Cellitti, J. F., Riel-Mehan, M., Emdadi, A., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805677105 · Cited by 186
Inhibition of Acetylcholinesterase, β-Amyloid Aggregation, and NMDA Receptors in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Promising Direction for the Multi-target-Directed Ligands Gold Rush
Rosini, M., Simoni, E., Bartolini, M., Cavalli, A., Ceccarini, L., Pascu, N., McClymont, D. W., Tarozzi, A., Bolognesi, M. L., Minarini, A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm800577j · Cited by 186
Docking, virtual high throughput screening and in silico fragment‐based drug design
Zoete, V., Grosdidier, A., & Michielin, O. A. (2009) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00665.x · Cited by 189
Tryptophan 2,3-Dioxygenase (TDO) Inhibitors. 3-(2-(Pyridyl)ethenyl)indoles as Potential Anticancer Immunomodulators
Dolušić, E., Larrieu, P., Moineaux, L., Stroobant, V., Pilotte, L., Colau, D., Pochet, L., den Eynde, B. J. V., Masereel, B., Wouters, J., et al. (2011) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm2006782 · Cited by 183
Virtual Screening of Biogenic Amine-Binding G-Protein Coupled Receptors: Comparative Evaluation of Protein- and Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Protocols
Evers, A., Heßler, G., Matter, H., & Klabunde, T. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050090o · Cited by 183
Structure-Based Discovery of Substituted 4,5′-Bithiazoles as Novel DNA Gyrase Inhibitors
Brvar, M., Perdih, A., Renko, M., Anderluh, G., Türk, V., & Šolmajer, T. (2012) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm300395d · Cited by 184
Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of GOLD scoring functions in a standardized test
Liebeschuetz, J. W., Cole, J. C., & Korb, O. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-012-9551-4 · Cited by 187
Glutathione peroxidase 4-catalyzed reduction of lipid hydroperoxides in membranes: The polar head of membrane phospholipids binds the enzyme and addresses the fatty acid hydroperoxide group toward the redox center
Cozza, G., Rossetto, M., Bosello-Travain, V., Maiorino, M., Roveri, A., Toppo, S., Zaccarin, M., Zennaro, L., & Ursini, F. (2017) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.07.010 · Cited by 188
Single-molecule pulling simulations can discern active from inactive enzyme inhibitors.
Colizzi, F., Perozzo, R., Scapozza, L., Recanatini, M., & Cavalli, A. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja100259r · Cited by 177
Nuclear Hormone Receptor Targeted Virtual Screening
Schapira, M., Abagyan, R. A., & Totrov, M. M. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0300173 · Cited by 184
A novel small-molecule disrupts Stat3 SH2 domain–phosphotyrosine interactions and Stat3-dependent tumor processes
Zhang, X., Yue, P., Fletcher, S., Zhao, W., Gunning, P. T., & Turkson, J. (2010) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2010.01.001 · Cited by 179
A Flexible Approach to Induced Fit Docking
Nabuurs, S. B., Wagener, M., & de Vlieg, J. (2007) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm070593p · Cited by 181
Novel and selective DNA methyltransferase inhibitors: Docking-based virtual screening and experimental evaluation
Kuck, D., Singh, N. P., Lyko, F., & Medina‐Franco, J. L. (2009) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2009.11.050 · Cited by 175
Non-antibiotic quorum sensing inhibitors acting against N-acyl homoserine lactone synthase as druggable target
Chang, C., Krishnan, T., Wang, H., Chen, Y., Yin, W., Chong, Y. M., Tan, L. Y., Chong, T. M., & Chan, K. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep07245 · Cited by 176
Computer-Aided Discovery of Anti-Inflammatory Thiazolidinones with Dual Cyclooxygenase/Lipoxygenase Inhibition
Geronikaki, A. A., Lagunin, A. A., Hadjipavlou‐Litina, D., Eleftheriou, P. T., Filimonov, D. A., Poroikov, V., Alam, I., & Saxena, A. K. (2008) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm701496h · Cited by 177
The holistic integration of virtual screening in drug discovery
Tanrikulu, Y., Krüger, B., & Proschak, E. (2013) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2013.01.007 · Cited by 184
Comprehensive Evaluation of Fourteen Docking Programs on Protein–Peptide Complexes
Weng, G., Gao, J., Wang, Z., Wang, E., Hu, X., Yao, X., Cao, D., & Hou, T. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01208 · Cited by 178
Influence of Protonation, Tautomeric, and Stereoisomeric States on Protein−Ligand Docking Results
ten Brink, T., & Exner, T. E. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800420z · Cited by 187
Pin1 and Par14 Peptidyl Prolyl Isomerase Inhibitors Block Cell Proliferation
Uchida, T., Takamiya, M., Takahashi, M., Miyashita, H., Ikeda, H., Terada, T., Matsuo, Y., Shirouzu, M., Yokoyama, S., Fujimori, F., et al. (2003) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/s1074-5521(02)00310-1 · Cited by 175
Exhaustive docking of molecular fragments with electrostatic solvation
Majeux, N., Scarsi, M., Apostolakis, J., Ehrhardt, C., & Caflisch, A. (1999) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19991001)37:1 · Cited by 175
Recent Advances in the Prediction of Pharmacokinetics Properties in Drug Design Studies: A Review
Pantaleão, S. Q., Fernandes, P. O., Gonçalves, J. E., Maltarollo, V. G., & Honório, K. M. (2021) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.202100542 · Cited by 184
Aromatic interactions at the ligand–protein interface: Implications for the development of docking scoring functions
Bryliński, M. (2017) · Chemical Biology & Drug Design · doi:10.1111/cbdd.13084 · Cited by 177
Polyoxidovanadates' interactions with proteins: An overview
Aureliano, M., Gumerova, N. I., Sciortino, G., Garribba, E., McLauchlan, C. C., Rompel, A., & Crans, D. C. (2021) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214344 · Cited by 174
MCDOCK: A Monte Carlo simulation approach to the molecular docking problem
Liu, M., & Wang, S. (1999) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1023/a:1008005918983 · Cited by 173
Fully Automated Molecular Mechanics Based Induced Fit Protein−Ligand Docking Method
Koska, J., Spassov, V. Z., Maynard, A. J., Yan, L., Austin, N., Flook, P. K., & Venkatachalam, C. M. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800081s · Cited by 171
Side‐chain flexibility in protein–ligand binding: The minimal rotation hypothesis
Zavodszky, M. I., & Kuhn, L. A. (2005) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.041153605 · Cited by 171
Efficient and accurate large library ligand docking with KarmaDock
Zhang, X., Zhang, O., Shen, C., Qu, W., Chen, S., Cao, H., Kang, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, E., Zhang, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00511-5 · Cited by 175
Fragment Based Drug Design: From Experimental to Computational Approaches
Kumar, A., Voet, A. R. D., & Zhang, K. Y. J. (2012) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986712803530467 · Cited by 174
Integrating Virtual Screening and Combinatorial Chemistry for Accelerated Drug Discovery
López-Vallejo, F., Caulfield, T. R., Martínez‐Mayorga, K., Giulianotti, M. A., Nefzi, A., Houghten, R. A., & Medina‐Franco, J. L. (2011) · Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening · doi:10.2174/138620711795767866 · Cited by 169
Translation termination factor GSPT1 is a phenotypically relevant off-target of heterobifunctional phthalimide degraders
Ishoey, M., Chorn, S., Singh, N., Jaeger, M. G., Brand, M., Paulk, J., Bauer, S., Erb, M. A., Parapatics, K., Müller, A. C., et al. (2018) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.7b00969 · Cited by 177
Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Is the Anticancer Target for a Novel Series of Potent Naphthoquinone-Based Inhibitors
Kumar, S., Malachowski, W. P., DuHadaway, J. B., LaLonde, J. M., Carroll, P. J., Jaller, D., Metz, R. A., Prendergast, G. C., & Muller, A. J. (2008) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm7014155 · Cited by 171
Physics-Based Scoring of Protein−Ligand Complexes: Enrichment of Known Inhibitors in Large-Scale Virtual Screening
Huang, N., Kalyanaraman, C., Irwin, J. J., & Jacobson, M. P. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci0502855 · Cited by 175
Multiplexed precision genome editing with trackable genomic barcodes in yeast
Roy, K. R., Smith, J., Vonesch, S. C., Lin, G., Szu‐Tu, C., Lederer, A. R., Chu, A. M., Suresh, S., Nguyen, M., Horecka, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4137 · Cited by 175
Structure of a Human Carcinogen-converting Enzyme, SULT1A1
Gamage, N. U., Duggleby, R. G., Barnett, A. C., Tresillian, M. J., Latham, C. F., Liyou, N. E., McManus, M. E., & Martin, J. L. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m207246200 · Cited by 168
Comparison of Consensus Scoring Strategies for Evaluating Computational Models of Protein−Ligand Complexes
Oda, A., Tsuchida, K., Takakura, T., Yamaotsu, N., & Hirono, S. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci050283k · Cited by 171

Authors: Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R., & Taylor, R.
Affiliations: University of Sheffield (GB)
Wellcome Trust (GB)
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (GB)
Corresponding author: Jones, Gareth
ORCID: Jones, Gareth
Willett, Peter
Glen, Robert C
Leach, Andrew R
Taylor, Robin
Venue: Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1997-04
Volume: 267
Issue: 3
Pages: 727-748
ISSN: 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897
OpenAlex: W2050456292
Cited by: 6,763
References: 87
Citations by year: 2026: 244 · 2025: 332 · 2024: 356 · 2023: 361 · 2022: 383 · 2021: 414 · 2020: 394 · 2019: 351 · 2018: 327 · 2017: 270 · 2016: 248 · 2015: 234 · 2014: 237 · 2013: 248 · 2012: 274
Type: book review
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords: protein-ligand docking, genetic algorithm, flexible docking, protein-ligand complex, ligand conformational flexibility, rational drug design, binding mode prediction
MeSH terms: Algorithms, Binding Sites, Computer Simulation, Humans, Ligands, Models, Genetic, Models, Molecular, NADP, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase, Crystallography, X-Ray

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking 1 1Edited by F. E. Cohen

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks