The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein folding: from the levinthal paradox to structure prediction
Open accessAbstract
This article is a personal perspective on the developments in the field of protein folding over approximately the last 40 years. In addition to its historical aspects, the article presents a view of the principles of protein folding with particular emphasis on the relationship of these principles to the problem of protein structure prediction. It is argued that despite much that is new, the essential elements of our current understanding of protein folding were anticipated by researchers many years ago. These elements include the recognition of the central importance of the polypeptide backbone as a determinant of protein conformation, hierarchical protein folding, and multiple folding pathways. Important areas of progress include a detailed characterization of the folding pathways of a number of proteins and a fundamental understanding of the physical chemical forces that determine protein stability. Despite these developments, fold prediction algorithms still encounter difficulties in identifying the correct fold for a given sequence. This may be due to the possibility that the free energy differences between at least a few alternate conformations of many proteins are not large. Significant progress in protein structure prediction has been due primarily to the explosive growth of sequence and structural databases. However, further progress is likely to depend in part on the ability to combine information available from databases with principles and algorithms derived from physical chemical studies of protein folding. An approach to the integration of the two areas is outlined with specific reference to the PrISM program that is a fully integrated sequence/structural-analysis/fold-recognition/homology model building software system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains
Anfinsen, C. B. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · Cited by 7,096
From Levinthal to pathways to funnels
Dill, K. A., & Chan, H. S. (1997) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0197-10 · Cited by 2,293
Cited by
Theoretical Methods for the Description of the Solvent Effect in Biomolecular Systems
Orozco, M., & Luque, F. J. (2000) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990052a · Cited by 622
Contribution of hydrogen bonds to protein stability
Pace, C. N., Fu, H., Lee Fryar, K., Landua, J., Trevino, S. R., Schell, D., Thurlkill, R. L., Imura, S., Scholtz, J. M., Gajiwala, K., et al. (2014) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2449 · Cited by 599
Structure and Energetics of the Hydrogen-Bonded Backbone in Protein Folding
Bolen, D. W., & Rose, G. D. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.131357 · Cited by 408
Lessons in stability from thermophilic proteins
Razvi, A., & Scholtz, J. M. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062130306 · Cited by 320
Baldwin, R. L. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.078 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Honig, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 293
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 283-293
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075104651
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein folding: from the levinthal paradox to structure prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmbi.1999.3006
- The paper
- Honig, B. (1999). Protein folding: from the levinthal paradox to structure prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.3006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.