The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Neuropsychology of Memory Illusions: False Recall and Recognition in Amnesic Patients
Open accessAbstract
Memory illusions have been explored extensively in cognitive studies of normal memory, but hardly at all in neuropsychological research with amnesic patients. The present experiment examined false recall and recognition of nonstudied words that are preceded by a list of strong associates. We used the Deese (1959) paradigm, recently revived by Roediger and McDermott (1995), in which people frequently claim that nonstudied words appeared on a presented list. Results showed that amnesic patients were less susceptible to false recognition than were matched controls and showed different patterns of false recall. To account for the observed differences between amnesics and controls, we suggest that false recognition of nonstudied words preceded by numerous associates depends on the same kinds of semantic and associative information about study list words that also supports accurate recognition. Amnesic patients do not retain such information, resulting in poor recollection of study list words and decreased susceptibility to false recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Memory and Working-with-Memory: A Component Process Model Based on Modules and Central Systems
Moscovitch, M. (1992) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.257 · Cited by 822
Implicit Memory: A Selective Review
Schacter, D. L., Chiu, C. Y. P., & Ochsner, K. N. (1993) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.001111 · Cited by 621
Self-citationReality monitoring: Evidence from confabulation in organic brain disease patients.
Johnson, M. K. (1991) · Cited by 136
Memory Conjunction Errors in Normal and Amnesic Subjects
Reinitz, M. T., Verfaellie, M. H., & Milberg, W. (1996) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0016 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Cited by
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 · Cited by 3,840
The Medial Temporal Lobe and Recognition Memory
Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328 · Cited by 2,580
Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis
Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002034 · Cited by 1,879
The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087 · Cited by 1,836
Self-citationThe seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.
Schacter, D. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.3.182 · Cited by 1,133
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., & Pradere, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 319-334
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068530826
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Neuropsychology of Memory Illusions: False Recall and Recognition in Amnesic Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmla.1996.0018
- The paper
- Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., & Pradere, D. (1996). The Neuropsychology of Memory Illusions: False Recall and Recognition in Amnesic Patients. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.