Cited by 3,840Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research

Yonelinas, Andrew P·2002·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even when a testing effect cannot be seen in overall recognition performance, there is evidence of the testing effect in the recollection component of recognition.

    “It appears, though, that even when a testing effect cannot be seen in overall recognition performance, if one breaks down the components of recognition into recollection and familiarity (using methods developed under the dual process framework; see Yonelinas 2002), there is evidence of the testing effect in the recollection component (Chan & McDermott 2007).”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Yonelinas 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yonelinas, A. P.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Yonelinas, Andrew P
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
441-517
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144741543
Cited by
3,840
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 137 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 166 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 218 · 2020: 176 · 2019: 184 · 2018: 187 · 2017: 169 · 2016: 158 · 2015: 206 · 2014: 180 · 2013: 194 · 2012: 210
FWCI
39.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
recollection, familiarity, recognition memory, dual-process models, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, implicit memory, free recall, signal detection, aging, benzodiazepines, response criteria, fluency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review