The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database
Kilgarriff, A., & Fellbaum, C. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,464
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM)
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1996) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 2,276
Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers.
Ratcliff, R. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510 · Cited by 2,123
Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects
Swinney, D. A. (1979) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90355-4 · Cited by 1,786
Bergum, B. O., & Dornic, S. (1978) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421701 · Cited by 1,772
Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9 · Cited by 1,752
Self-citationAccess to the Internal Lexicon
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (2022) · Attention and Performance VI · doi:10.4324/9781003309734-29 · Cited by 1,303
Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words
Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980) · Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation · doi:10.3758/bf03201693 · Cited by 868
Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology
Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643299308253469 · Cited by 856
Cited by
The Neural Mechanisms of Speech Comprehension: fMRI studies of Semantic Ambiguity
Rodd, J. M., Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi009 · Cited by 632
Self-citationThe time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data
Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048 · Cited by 586
Self-citationHoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x · Cited by 414
Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context
Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.004 · Cited by 392
Lemhöfer, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2004) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03195845 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-266
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046121397
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 16.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmla.2001.2810
- The paper
- Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2810
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
