Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 926

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nonlinear-Least-Squares Analysis of Slow-Motion EPR Spectra in One and Two Dimensions Using a Modified Levenberg–Marquardt Algorithm

Open access
Budil, David E., Lee, Sanghyuk, Saxena, Sunil, Freed, Jack H.·1996·Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A

Abstract

The application of the “model trust region” modification of the Levenberg–Marquardt minimization algorithm to the analysis of one-dimensional CW EPR and multidimensional Fourier-transform (FT) EPR spectra especially in the slow-motion regime is described. The dynamic parameters describing the slow motion are obtained from least-squares fitting of model calculations based on the stochastic Liouville equation (SLE) to experimental spectra. The trust-region approach is inherently more efficient than the standard Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, and the efficiency of the procedure may be further increased by a separation-of-variables method in which a subset of fitting parameters is independently minimized at each iteration, thus reducing the number of parameters to be fitted by nonlinear least squares. A particularly useful application of this method occurs in the fitting of multicomponent spectra, for which it is possible to obtain the relative population of each component by the separation-of-variables method. These advantages, combined with recent improvements in the computational methods used to solve the SLE, have led to an order-of-magnitude reduction in computing time, and have made it possible to carry out interactive, real-time fitting on a laboratory workstation with a graphical interface. Examples of fits to experimental data will be given, including multicomponent CW EPR spectra as well as two- and three-dimensional FT EPR spectra. Emphasis is placed on the analytic information available from the partial derivatives utilized in the algorithm, and how it may be used to estimate the condition and uniqueness of the fit, as well as to estimate confidence limits for the parameters in certain cases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmra.1996.0113

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 926

Metadata

Authors
Budil, D. E., Lee, S., Saxena, S., & Freed, J. H.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-06
Volume
120
Issue
2
Pages
155-189
ISSN
1064-1858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128677332
Cited by
926
References
0
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear-Least-Squares Analysis of Slow-Motion EPR Spectra in One and Two Dimensions Using a Modified Levenberg–Marquardt Algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmra.1996.0113
The paper
Budil, D. E., Lee, S., Saxena, S., & Freed, J. H. (1996). Nonlinear-Least-Squares Analysis of Slow-Motion EPR Spectra in One and Two Dimensions Using a Modified Levenberg–Marquardt Algorithm. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmra.1996.0113

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.