The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives
Open accessAbstract
Ecosystem objectives in fisheries management usually flow from high-level nationalpolicies or strategies and international agreements. Consequently they are oftenbroadly stated and hence are difficult to incorporate directly in management plans.Predicting the results of any management action is very uncertain because thedynamics of ecosystems are complex and poorly understood. Methods to design andevaluate operational management strategies have advanced considerably in the pastdecade. These management-strategy-evaluation (MSE) methods rely on simulationtesting of the whole management process using performance measures derived fromoperational objectives. The MSE approach involves selecting (operational) managementobjectives, specifying performance measures, specifying alternative managementstrategies, and evaluating these using simulation. The MSE framework emphasizes theidentification and modelling of uncertainties, and propagates these through to theireffects on the performance measures. The framework is outlined and illustrated bythree ecosystem-related applications: management of benthic habitats and broad fishcommunity composition; by-catch of species of high conservation value; and foodchaininteractions and dependencies. Challenges to be overcome before broaderecosystem-related objectives can be fully handled are discussed briefly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment
Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. J. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3598-0 · Cited by 3,068
Cited by
Towards sustainability in world fisheries.
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guénette, S., Pitcher, T. J., Sumaila, U. R., Walters, C. J., Watson, R., & Zeller, D. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01017 · Cited by 3,019
Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management
Pikitch, E. K., Santora, C., Babcock, E. A., Bakun, A., Bonfil, R., Conover, D. O., Dayton, P., Doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Heneman, B., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098222 · Cited by 2,312
Self-citationLessons in modelling and management of marine ecosystems: the Atlantis experience
Fulton, E. A., Link, J. S., Kaplan, I. C., Savina‐Rolland, M., Johnson, P., Ainsworth, C., Horne, P., Gorton, R., Gamble, R. J., Smith, A. D. M., et al. (2011) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00412.x · Cited by 593
Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management
Fulton, E. A., Smith, A. D. M., Smith, D. C., & van Putten, I. E. (2011) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00371.x · Cited by 572
Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: Review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues
Katsanevakis, S., Stelzenmüller, V., South, A., Sørensen, T. K., Jones, P. J. S., Kerr, S., Badalamenti, F., Anagnostou, C., Breen, P., Chust, G., et al. (2011) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.09.002 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Sainsbury, K.
- Venue
- ICES Journal of Marine Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 731-741
- ISSN
- 1054-3139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122505518
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0737
- The paper
- Sainsbury, K. (2000). Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives. ICES Journal of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.