Cited by 11Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrobial Inactivation Methods

Electroporation of DNA sequences from the pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) of toxigenic Clostridium difficile into a non-toxigenic strain

Ackermann, G., Tang, Y.J., Henderson, J.P., Rodloff, A.C., Silva Jr, J., Cohen, S.H.·2001·Molecular and Cellular Probes

Abstract

Toxigenic Clostridium difficile is the etiologic agent of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD), the most common cause of hospital-acquired infectious diarrhoea. The genes tcdA and tcdB, which encode for the toxin A and B proteins, are part of the pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) of toxigenic C. difficile. Genetic and virulence studies at the molecular level in C. difficile have been hindered by the lack of techniques for DNA manipulation in this species. We describe the electroporation of DNA fragments from a toxigenic isolate into a non-toxigenic strain of C. difficile. Using previously described methods of electroporation into Clostridium spp., the complete toxin B gene and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments of the PaLoc were cloned and electroporated into a non-toxigenic strain of C. difficile. The resulting transformed clones were screened for the introduced gene fragments by PCR, which confirmed their presence. This is the first description of introduction of DNA into C. difficile by electroporation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/mcpr.2001.0373

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some well-studied non-acetogenic clostridia, such as C. acetobutylicum, C. beijerinckii, C. difficile, and C. botulinum, have transformation protocols that were established as early as 1988.

    “Some of the well-studied, non-acetogenic clostridia, such as the ABE model organisms C. acetobutylicum (Mermelstein et al., 1992) and C. beijerinckii (Oultram et al., 1988), and important pathogens, such as C. difficile (Ackermann et al., 2001) and C. botulinum (Zhou and Johnson, 1993), have transformation protocols that were established as early as 1988.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ackermann, G., Tang, Y. J., Henderson, J. P., Rodloff, A. C., Silva Jr, J., & Cohen, S. H.
Affiliations
University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Probes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
301-306
ISSN
0890-8508 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143640115
Cited by
11
References
13
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Probes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
Keywords
Clostridium difficile, electroporation, pathogenicity locus, toxin B gene, TcdA, TcdB, non-toxigenic strains, toxigenic strains, gene transfer, virulence genes
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Bacterial Toxins, Cloning, Molecular, Clostridium Infections, DNA, Bacterial, Humans, Virulence, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Clostridioides difficile, Electroporation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review