The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Contributions of Motor Cortex, Basal Ganglia, and Cerebellum to Speech Motor Control: Effects of Syllable Repetition Rate Evaluated by fMRI
Abstract
In order to delineate the neuroanatomical correlates of speech motor control, functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed during silent repetitions of the syllable "ta" at three different rates (2.5, 4.0, and 5.5 Hz). Spatial extent and magnitude of hemodynamic responses at the level of the motor cortex showed a positive correlation to production frequencies. As concerns the basal ganglia, the lower rates (2.5 and 4.0 Hz) gave rise to higher magnitudes of activation within the left putamen as compared to the 5.5 Hz condition. In contrast, cerebellar responses were rather restricted to fast performance (4.0 and 5.5 Hz) and exhibited a shift in caudal direction during 5.5 as compared to 4.0 Hz. These findings corroborate the suggestion of a differential impact of various cortical and subcortical areas on speech motor control.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, while activation in the motor cortex and left thalamus increased with the rate of speech production, activation in the left putamen was higher for slower production rates (Wildgruber et al., 2001).”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Wildgruber et al., 2001
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Stuss, D. T., & Benson, D. F. (1986) · Raven Press eBooks · Cited by 2,102
Schmahmann, J. D. (2019) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005 · Cited by 1,625
3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes
Evans, A. C., Collins, D. L., Mills, S., Brown, E. D., Kelly, R. L., & Peters, T. M. (2005) · IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) · doi:10.1109/nssmic.1993.373602 · Cited by 1,487
Posner, M. I., & Dehaene, S. (1994) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(94)90078-7 · Cited by 897
Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography
Deiber, M., Passingham, R. E., Colebatch, J. G., Friston, K. J., Nixon, P. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00231461 · Cited by 895
MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum
Schmahmann, J. D., Doyon, J., Toga, A. W., Petrides, M., & Evans, A. C. (2000) · Cited by 575
Brain regions involved in articulation
Wise, R., Greene, J., Büchel, C., & Scott, S. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07491-1 · Cited by 517
Deiber, M., Honda, M., Ibañez, V., Sadato, N., & Hallett, M. (1999) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1999.81.6.3065 · Cited by 425
(1972) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-77-5-826_1 · Cited by 379
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–206 of 206
Cerebellum involvement in speaking and singing
Eggermont, J. J. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29847-9.00007-3
Dynamics of striatal action selection and reinforcement learningPreprint
Lindsey, J. W., Markowitz, J. E., Gillis, W. F., Datta, S. R., & Litwin-Kumar, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.101747.2
Hannemann, W., Stahuber, L., Kouba, T., Lindenberg, K. S., Rapp, D., Lewerenz, J., Huppertz, H., Tykalová, T., Rusz, J., Landwehrmeyer, G. B., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-025-13310-x
Embodied and situated language processing: Production
Repetto, C., & Scerrati, E. (2026) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2026.02.007
Motor speech markers of Alzheimer’s risk
Giffard, J., Bindoff, A. D., Roccati, E., Li, R., Vogel, A. P., Goldberg, L. R., Bai, Q., King, A. E., Vickers, J. C., & Alty, J. (2026) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-026-02560-w
Ghosh (2008) · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0119
Metadata
- Authors
- Wildgruber, D., Ackermann, H., & Grodd, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-109
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053214069
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- speech motor control, motor cortex, basal ganglia, cerebellum, putamen, silent speech, hemodynamic response, neuroanatomical correlates
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Basal Ganglia, Cerebellum, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Psychomotor Performance, Speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
